Brandon Nakashima and Filip Horansky will fight against each other in the semifinal of the Quimper Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 5:30 pm on CENTRAL. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Brandon Nakashima who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Brandon Nakashima is the pick to win this match.
Brandon Nakashima -> 1.168
Filip Horansky -> 5.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Brandon Nakashima vs. Filip Horansky
There is no head to head record between Brandon Nakashima and Filip Horansky since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Brandon Nakashima
Ranked no. 163 (career high), Nakashima got to the semifinal after beating Maxime Janvier 6-3 6-2, Federico Gaio 6-2 6-1 and Constant Lestienne 6-4 7-5.
In the quarter, Brandon had a good straight sets win against Lestienne (6-4 7-5). During the match Nakashima scored 86 points vs Lestienne’s 72. Nakashima was pretty aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nakashima bagged 8 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults. Overall, Brandon Nakashima was pretty effective on serve to win 77% (33/43) of his 1st serve and 65% (11/17) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Lestienne 3 times after converting 19% of his break points (3/16).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Nakashima hasn’t lost yet a set in this event to win 58% of the points he played.
Nakashima has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 65% of his matches (70-37). 4-1 on indoor hard courts in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Nakashima has a 17-8 match record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
Brandon has a 4-2 win-loss record in 2021, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Quimper Challenger
The American didn’t play in the Quimper Challenger in 2020.
Filip Horansky
Ranked no. 184, Filip reached the semifinal after defeating Lucas Pouille 6-4 5-7 6-4, Maximilian Marterer 6-76 7-5 6-4 and Kacper Zuk 6-3 7-5.
In the quarter, Horansky had a good straight sets win against Zuk (6-3 7-5). During the match Horansky scored 65 points vs Zuk’s 53. Horansky was pretty aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Horansky bagged 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Filip Horansky was extremely effective on serve to win 76% (26/34) of his 1st serve and 60% (18/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Horansky was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Zuk 3 times.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Filip has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
Filip has a 3-2 win-loss record in 2021, 3-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nakashima | Horansky |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 54 | 88 |
| Pts | 199-142 | 284-260 |
| Total Points | 341 | 544 |
| Winners | 87 | 128 |
| %Winners | 44% | 45% |
Both Nakashima and Horansky played 3 matches. At the moment, Filip Horansky dropped 2 sets while Brandon Nakashima hasn’t dropped a set so far. Nakashima has played 2 set(s) less than Horansky (6 vs 8). Therefore, Nakashima played 34 games less than Horansky. The American scored 87 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Horansky recorded 128 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nakashima | Horansky |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 19 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 6.3 | 2.7 |
| 1st in | 109/153 | 177/287 |
| %1st in | 71% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 87/109 | 128/177 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 27/44 | 57/110 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 52% |
Nakashima fired 19 aces (6.3 per match). Horansky fired 8 aces (2.7 per match). Nakashima won 80% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Horansky won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nakashima | Horansky |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 11 |
| Converted | 10/30 | 11/23 |
| % Converted | 33% | 48% |
| Conceded | 3 | 20 |
| Saved | 2 | 14 |
| % Saved | 67% | 70% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 6 |
Nakashima broke his opponents 10 times with a 33% conversion rate. The American dropped his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Slovakian broke his opponents 11 times with a 48% conversion rate. Filip conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nakashima | |||||
| R1 Janvier |
R2 Gaio |
1/4 Lestienne |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-2 6-1 | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 15 | 22 | 54 | |
| pts | 61-43 | 52-27 | 86-72 | 199-142 | |
| Total points | 104 | 79 | 158 | 341 | |
| Winners | 31 | 23 | 33 | 87 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 44% | 38% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 6 | 8 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 37/53 | 29/40 | 43/60 | 109/153 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 73% | 72% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 31/37 | 23/29 | 33/43 | 87/109 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 79% | 77% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/16 | 9/11 | 11/17 | 27/44 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 82% | 65% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 3 | 10 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 4/5 | 3/16 | 10/30 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 80% | 19% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 0/0 | 0/1 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | – | 0% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Horansky | |||||
| R1 Pouille |
R2 Marterer |
1/4 Zuk |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | 6-76 7-5 6-4 | 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 35 | 21 | 88 | |
| pts | 101-96 | 118-111 | 65-53 | 284-260 | |
| Total points | 197 | 229 | 118 | 544 | |
| Winners | 46 | 56 | 26 | 128 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 47% | 40% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 67/103 | 76/120 | 34/64 | 177/287 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 63% | 53% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 46/67 | 56/76 | 26/34 | 128/177 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 74% | 76% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/36 | 22/44 | 18/30 | 57/110 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 50% | 60% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 3 | 11 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/13 | 3/3 | 11/23 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 31% | 100% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 6 | 3 | 20 | |
| Saved | 8/11 | 4/6 | 2/3 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 73% | 67% | 67% | 69% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLLLWLW
Tennis Scores in Quimper Challenger
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (6-77 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Filip HoranskyHoransky – Kacper ZukZuk (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Sebastian KordaKorda – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (4-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Constant LestienneLestienne (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Constant LestienneLestienne (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Sebastian KordaKorda – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (4-1 ret.) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Filip HoranskyHoransky – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Sebastian KordaKorda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
