Denis Istomin and Constant Lestienne will face off in the 2nd round of the Quimper Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 8:30 pm on CENTRAL. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Constant Lestienne who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Constant Lestienne is the pick to win this match.
Constant Lestienne -> 1.58
Denis Istomin -> 2.38
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Denis Istomin vs. Constant Lestienne
There is no head to head record between Denis Istomin and Constant Lestienne since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Denis Istomin
Ranked no. 183, the Uzbek got to the 2nd round after beating Lukas Lacko 6-3 6-72 7-64.
In the 1st round, Denis defeated Lacko (6-3 6-72 7-64). During the match Istomin scored 115 points vs Lacko’s 107. Istomin was pretty aggressive to blast 53 winners.
Talking about the service games, Istomin recorded 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Denis Istomin lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Istomin put 71% of his first serves in, winning 67% (53/79) of the points behind his 1st serve and 63% (20/32) on the 2nd serve. Istomin broke Lacko 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Istomin has won exactly 50% of his matches (260-257) in the last 10 years. 2-2 on indoor hard courts in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Istomin has a 50-53 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Istomin has a 2-3 win-loss record in 2021, 2-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Quimper Challenger
The Uzbek didn’t compete in the Quimper Challenger in 2020.
Constant Lestienne
Ranked no. 227, the French player got to the 2nd round after beating Denis Kudla 6-2 7-66.
In the 1st round, Constant had a good straight sets win against Kudla (6-2 7-66). During the match Lestienne and Kudla scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 183 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match.
Talking about serving, Lestienne was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Constant Lestienne conceded no breaks for the entire match to put NAN% of his first serves in, win NAN% (/) of the points behind his 1st serve and NAN% (/) on the 2nd serve.
Constant has a 3-1 win-loss record in 2021, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Quimper Challenger
Constant lost in the 3rd round to Cem Ilkel.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Istomin | Lestienne |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 35 | 21 |
| Pts | 115-107 | 0-0 |
| Total Points | 222 | 0 |
| Winners | 53 | 0 |
| %Winners | 46% | NAN% |
Both Istomin and Lestienne played 1 match. At the moment, Denis Istomin lost 1 set while Constant Lestienne hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Istomin has played 1 set more than Lestienne (3 vs 2). Therefore, Istomin played 14 games more than Lestienne. The Uzbek scored 53 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Constant managed to score 0 winners (NAN%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Istomin | Lestienne |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 0 |
| 1st in | 79/111 | 0/0 |
| %1st in | 71% | NAN% |
| 1st pts | 53/79 | 0/0 |
| %1st pts | 67% | NAN% |
| 2nd pts | 20/32 | 0/0 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | NAN% |
Istomin recorded 5 aces . Lestienne didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Istomin won 67% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Lestienne won NAN% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win NAN% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Istomin | Lestienne |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 0 |
| Converted | 3/9 | 0/0 |
| % Converted | 33% | NAN% |
| Conceded | 9 | 0 |
| Saved | 7 | 0 |
| % Saved | 78% | NAN% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
The Uzbek broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Denis surrendered his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. On the other side, Lestienne hasn’t manged yet to break his opponent. He didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. Lestienne was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point.
| Istomin | |||
| R1 Lacko |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-72 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
| pts | 115-107 | 115-107 | |
| Total points | 222 | 222 | |
| Winners | 53 | 53 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 79/111 | 79/111 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 53/79 | 53/79 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/32 | 20/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Lestienne | |||
| R1 Kudla |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | – | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | NAN% | – | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | – | NAN% | |
| 1st pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | – | NAN% | |
| 2nd pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | – | NAN% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | / | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | – | NAN% | |
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
Head 2 Head
L
LLLLWLLLLL Tennis Scores in Quimper Challenger
- Yannick MadenMaden – Thomas FabbianoFabbiano (6-1 5-7 6-1) – See score progression
- Sebastian KordaKorda – Tristan LamasineLamasine (7-63 4-6 7-67) – See score progression
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Lukas RosolRosol (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-3 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Kacper ZukZuk – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Arthur CazauxCazaux (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Denis KudlaKudla (6-2 7-66) – See score progression
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Hugo GastonGaston (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Federico GaioGaio – Ernests GulbisGulbis (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Denis IstominIstomin – Lukas LackoLacko (6-3 6-72 7-64) – See score progression
- Evan FurnessFurness – Roberto MarcoraMarcora (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Denis KudlaKudla (6-2 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Sebastian KordaKorda – Tristan LamasineLamasine (7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(7)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Denis IstominIstomin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas PouillePouille – Filip HoranskyHoransky (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Sebastian KordaKorda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Evan FurnessFurness (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Sebastian OfnerOfner (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Benjamin BonziBonzi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine Cornut-ChauvincCornut-Chauvinc – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Federico GaioGaio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
