Illya Marchenko and Tung-Lin Wu will square off in the qualifications of the Quimper Challenger for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:00 pm on COURT 1. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tung-Lin Wu who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tung-Lin Wu is the pick to win this match.
Tung-Lin Wu -> 1.86
Illya Marchenko -> 1.86
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Illya Marchenko vs. Tung-Lin Wu
This will be the 2nd time that Illya Marchenko and Tung-Lin Wu face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Wu (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
Illya Marchenko
Ranked no. 215, Marchenko reached the qualifications after beating Sean Cuenin 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Illya had a good straight sets win against Cuenin (6-4 6-2). During the match Marchenko scored 59 points vs Cuenin’s 40. Illya was quite aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Marchenko managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Illya Marchenko was exceptionally effective on serve to win 81% (25/31) of his 1st serve and 75% (12/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Marchenko broke Cuenin 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Marchenko has a winning match record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (291-206). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Marchenko has a 122-63 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Illya has a 1-1 win-loss record in 2021, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Quimper Challenger
Illya didn’t play in the Quimper Challenger in 2020.
Tung-Lin Wu
Ranked no. 250, the Chinese got to the qualifications after defeating Julian Lenz 4-6 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications against Lenz, Wu recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-1). During the match Wu scored 91 points vs Lenz’s 67. Wu was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Wu made 8 aces and he was extremely solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Tung-Lin Wu was very efficient on serve to win 73% (38/52) of his 1st serve and 76% (13/17) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Chinese broke Lenz 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
The Chinese has a 3-1 win-loss record in 2021, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Marchenko | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 26 |
| Pts | 59-40 | 91-67 |
| Total Points | 99 | 158 |
| Winners | 25 | 38 |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% |
Both Marchenko and Wu played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Tung-Lin Wu dropped 1 set while Illya Marchenko hasn’t dropped a set so far. Marchenko has played 1 set(s) less than Wu (2 vs 3). Therefore, Marchenko played 8 games less than Wu. Illya scored 25 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The Chinese blasted 38 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Marchenko | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 8 |
| 1st in | 31/47 | 52/69 |
| %1st in | 66% | 75% |
| 1st pts | 25/31 | 38/52 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 12/16 | 13/17 |
| %2nd pts | 75% | 76% |
Marchenko struck 3 aces . Wu scored 8 aces . Marchenko won 81% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 75% of the points. On the other side, Wu won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 76% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Marchenko | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 4/5 |
| % Converted | 43% | 80% |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 |
| Saved | 1 | 0 |
| % Saved | 100% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The Ukrainian broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Ukrainian was rock solid on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 1 break points. Wu broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Wu conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Marchenko | |||
| Q1 Cuenin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 59-40 | 59-40 | |
| Total points | 99 | 99 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 31/47 | 31/47 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 25/31 | 25/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/16 | 12/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 75% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Wu | |||
| Q1 Lenz |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 91-67 | 91-67 | |
| Total points | 158 | 158 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 52/69 | 52/69 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 38/52 | 38/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/17 | 13/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 76% | 76% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWWWLLL
WLWLWLLWWL Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tobias KamkeKamke – Kacper ZukZuk (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Thomas FabbianoFabbiano – Yannick MadenMaden (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas LackoLacko – Denis IstominIstomin (2-7) – H2H and prediction
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ernests GulbisGulbis – Federico GaioGaio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marius CopilCopil – Tristan LamasineLamasine (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas PouillePouille – Filip HoranskyHoransky (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Lukas RosolRosol (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Sebastian OfnerOfner (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Antoine Cornut-ChauvincCornut-Chauvinc (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Benjamin BonziBonzi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Roberto MarcoraMarcora (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GastonGaston – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (0-0) – H2H and prediction
