Yuriko Miyazaki and Lexie Stevens will clash against each other in the quarter of the Cairo (W15) for the 1st time in their career. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Yuriko Miyazaki who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Yuriko Miyazaki is the pick to win this match.
Yuriko Miyazaki -> 1.84
Lexie Stevens -> 1.96
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Yuriko Miyazaki vs. Lexie Stevens
There is no head to head record between Yuriko Miyazaki and Lexie Stevens since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Yuriko Miyazaki
Ranked no. 347, Miyazaki reached the quarter after beating Hams Metwali 6-1 6-0, Veronika Bokor 6-2 6-3, Adele Burato 6-3 6-3 and Hana Mortagy 6-1 3-0 ret..
In the 2nd round, Miyazaki had a good straight sets win against Mortagy (6-1 3-0 ret.). During the match Miyazaki scored 44 points vs Mortagy’s 22. Yuriko was extremely aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about the service games, Miyazaki scored just 1 ace throughout the match and she committed only 2 double faults. Yuriko Miyazaki conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Miyazaki put 70% of her first serves in, winning 77% (20/26) of the points behind her 1st serve and 36% (4/11) on the 2nd serve. Miyazaki broke Mortagy 4 times after converting 57% of her break points (4/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Miyazaki hasn’t dropped yet a set in this competition to win 57% of the points she played.
Miyazaki has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 65% of her matches (85-46). 4-0 on clay in 2021. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Miyazaki has a 6-4 record in the last 6 years on clay.
Miyazaki has a 4-0 win-loss record in 2021, 4-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Cairo (W15)
Miyazaki didn’t compete in Cairo (W15) in 2020.
Lexie Stevens
Ranked no. 603, Lexie reached the quarter after beating Emma Davis 6-1 6-4 and Fanny Ostlund 6-3 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Stevens had a good straight sets win against Ostlund (6-3 6-4). During the match Stevens scored 64 points vs Ostlund’s 52. Lexie was very aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Stevens couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she was extremely steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Lexie Stevens lost the serve 3 times. Furthermore, Stevens put 87% of her first serves in, winning 56% (23/41) of the points behind her 1st serve and 67% (4/6) on the 2nd serve. Lexie broke Ostlund 6 times after converting 55% of her break points (6/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Stevens hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 56% of the points she played.
Lexie has a 4-1 win-loss record in 2021, 4-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Cairo (W15)
The Dutch surrendered in the quarter to Elina Avanesyan.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Miyazaki | Stevens |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 48 | 36 |
| Pts | 67-51 | 126-100 |
| Total Points | 118 | 226 |
| Winners | 26 | 44 |
| %Winners | 39% | 35% |
Miyazaki played 3 matches while Stevens competed in 2 matches. Miyazaki started her run from the qualifications while Stevens had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Miyazaki has played 2 sets more than Stevens (6 vs 4). Therefore, Miyazaki played 12 games more than Stevens. The Japanese scored 26 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Lexie managed to score 44 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Miyazaki | Stevens |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
| 1st in | 44/59 | 84/98 |
| %1st in | 75% | 86% |
| 1st pts | 26/44 | 44/84 |
| %1st pts | 59% | 52% |
| 2nd pts | 4/15 | 9/14 |
| %2nd pts | 27% | 64% |
Miyazaki didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Stevens also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Miyazaki won 59% points behind her first serve. She pretty effective on her second serve to win 27% of the points. On the other side, Stevens won 52% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Miyazaki | Stevens |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 13 |
| Converted | 7/14 | 13/24 |
| % Converted | 50% | 54% |
| Conceded | 8 | 10 |
| Saved | 4 | 4 |
| % Saved | 50% | 40% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 6 |
Yuriko broke her opponents 7 times with a 50% conversion rate. Miyazaki lost her serve 4 times and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded. Lexie broke her opponents 13 times with a 54% conversion rate. Stevens conceded her serve 6 times and she saved 40% of the break points that she conceded.
| Miyazaki | ||||||
| Q2 Metwali |
Q3 Bokor |
R1 Burato |
R2 Mortagy |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | 6-2 6-3 | 6-3 6-3 | 6-1 3-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 17 | 18 | 10 | 58 | |
| pts | – | – | 67-51 | 44-22 | 111-73 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | 118 | 66 | 184 | |
| Winners | 26 | 20 | 46 | |||
| %Winners | NAN% | NAN% | 39% | 45% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||
| 1st in | / | / | 44/59 | 26/37 | 70/96 | |
| % 1st in | NAN% | NAN% | 75% | 70% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | / | / | 26/44 | 20/26 | 46/70 | |
| % 1st pts | NAN% | NAN% | 59% | 77% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | / | / | 4/15 | 4/11 | 8/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | NAN% | NAN% | 27% | 36% | 31% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 7 | 4 | 11 | |||
| Converted | / | / | 7/14 | 4/7 | 11/21 | |
| Converted % | NAN% | NAN% | 50% | 57% | 52% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 2 | 10 | |||
| Saved | 0/ | 0/ | 4/8 | 2/2 | 6 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 50% | 100% | 38% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 | 4 | |||
| Stevens | ||||||
| R1 Davis |
R2 Ostlund |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | 6-3 6-4 | ||||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||
| Tot Games | 17 | 19 | 36 | |||
| pts | 62-48 | 64-52 | 126-100 | |||
| Total points | 110 | 116 | 226 | |||
| Winners | 21 | 23 | 44 | |||
| %Winners | 34% | 36% | 35% | |||
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 1 | |||
| 1st in | 43/51 | 41/47 | 84/98 | |||
| % 1st in | 84% | 87% | 86% | |||
| 1st pts | 21/43 | 23/41 | 44/84 | |||
| % 1st pts | 49% | 56% | 52% | |||
| 2nd pts | 5/8 | 4/6 | 9/14 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 67% | 64% | |||
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 7 | 6 | 13 | |||
| Converted | 7/13 | 6/11 | 13/24 | |||
| Converted % | 54% | 55% | 54% | |||
| Conceded | 7 | 3 | 10 | |||
| Saved | 4/7 | 0/3 | 4 | |||
| Saved % | 57% | 0% | 14% | |||
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | 6 | |||
Head 2 Head
LLWLWWLLLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Chanel SimmondsSimmonds – Anastasia NefedovaNefedova (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuriko MiyazakiMiyazaki – Lexie StevensStevens (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jessica Bouzas ManeiroBouzas Maneiro – Sinja KrausKraus (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna MorginaMorgina – Sandra SamirSamir (1-2) – H2H and prediction
