Sergiy Stakhovsky and Dane Sweeny will square off in the qualifications of the Australian Open Qualifying for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11.30 am on Court 1. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sergiy Stakhovsky who should win in 4 sets.
Sergiy Stakhovsky -> 1.285
Dane Sweeny -> 3.64
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Sergiy Stakhovsky vs. Dane Sweeny
There is no head to head record between Sergiy Stakhovsky and Dane Sweeny since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Ranked no. 201, Stakhovsky got to the qualifications after defeating Bernabe Zapata Miralles 7-64 6-4 and Jason Murray Kubler 7-64 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Ukrainian had a good straight sets win against Murray Kubler (7-64 6-4). During the match Stakhovsky scored 77 points vs Murray Kubler’s 66. The Ukrainian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Stakhovsky blasted 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Sergiy Stakhovsky was very efficient on serve to win 76% (31/41) of his 1st serve and 55% (12/22) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Ukrainian broke Murray Kubler 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Ukrainian hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this event to conquer 53% of the points he played.
Stakhovsky has a good win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (323-281). 2-0 on hard in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Stakhovsky has a 111-94 match record in the last years on hard.
Stakhovsky has a 2-0 win-loss record in 2021, 2-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year at the Australian Open Qualifying
Stakhovsky didn’t compete at the Australian Open Qualifying in 2020.
Dane Sweeny
Ranked no. 794, Dane got to the qualifications after defeating Marius Copil 7-63 2-6 6-3 and Denis Kudla w/o.
In the qualifications, Sweeny defeated Kudla (w/o). During the match Sweeny and Kudla scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 201 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match.
Talking about serving, Sweeny was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Dane Sweeny conceded no breaks for the entire match to put NAN% of his first serves in, win NAN% (/) of the points behind his 1st serve and NAN% (/) on the 2nd serve.
The Australian has a 1-0 win-loss record in 2021, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Stakhovsky | Sweeny |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 46 | 30 |
| Pts | 157-140 | 105-106 |
| Total Points | 297 | 211 |
| Winners | 69 | 46 |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% |
Stakhovsky played 2 matches while Sweeny competed in 1 match. At the moment, Dane Sweeny conceded 1 set while Sergiy Stakhovsky hasn’t dropped a set so far. Stakhovsky has played 1 set more than Sweeny (4 vs 3). Therefore, Stakhovsky played 16 games more than Sweeny. The Ukrainian scored 69 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian bagged 46 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Stakhovsky | Sweeny |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 5.5 | 6 |
| 1st in | 92/140 | 68/118 |
| %1st in | 66% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 69/92 | 46/68 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 22/48 | 25/50 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 50% |
Stakhovsky struck 11 aces (5.5 per match). Sweeny scored 6 aces . Stakhovsky won 75% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Sweeny won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Stakhovsky | Sweeny |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 2 |
| Converted | 6/14 | 2/9 |
| % Converted | 43% | 22% |
| Conceded | 11 | 15 |
| Saved | 7 | 12 |
| % Saved | 64% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 3 |
Stakhovsky broke his opponents 6 times with a 43% conversion rate. Sergiy conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded. Sweeny broke his opponent twice with a 22% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Stakhovsky | ||||
| Q1 Zapata Miralles | Q2 Murray Kubler | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-4 | 7-64 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | 46 | |
| pts | 80-74 | 77-66 | 157-140 | |
| Total points | 154 | 143 | 297 | |
| Winners | 38 | 31 | 69 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 40% | 44% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 8 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 51/77 | 41/63 | 92/140 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 65% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 38/51 | 31/41 | 69/92 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 76% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/26 | 12/22 | 22/48 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 55% | 46% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/6 | 6/14 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 50% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 2 | 11 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 0/2 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 0% | 39% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Sweeny | ||||
| Q1 Copil | Q2 Kudla | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 2-6 6-3 | w/o | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 0 | 30 | |
| pts | 105-106 | – | 105-106 | |
| Total points | 211 | 0 | 211 | |
| Winners | 46 | 46 | ||
| %Winners | 44% | NAN% | 44% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 0 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 16 | 16 | ||
| 1st in | 68/118 | / | 68/118 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | NAN% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 46/68 | / | 46/68 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | NAN% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/50 | / | 25/50 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | NAN% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 2 | ||
| Converted | 2/9 | / | 2/9 | |
| Converted % | 22% | NAN% | 22% | |
| Conceded | 15 | 15 | ||
| Saved | 12/15 | 0/ | 12 | |
| Saved % | 80% | – | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | ||
Tennis Scores at the Australian Open Qualifying
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (1-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Rinky HijikataHijikata (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Borna GojoGojo – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (6-3 7-67) – See score progression
- Mario Vilella MartinezVilella Martinez – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (w/o) – See score progression
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Steven DiezDiez (3-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Max PurcellPurcell (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Dustin BrownBrown – Carlos TabernerTaberner (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Joao MenezesMenezes (6-3 6-71 6-4) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Denis KudlaKudla (w/o) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (6-4 1-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Hugo DellienDellien – Andrew HarrisHarris (6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Yannick MadenMaden (2-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (7-61 7-64) – See score progression
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Blaz RolaRola (6-2 6-74 6-3) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Julian LenzLenz (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (2-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Antoine HoangHoang (7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Zhe LiLi (2-6 6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Robin HaaseHaase – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Maximilian MartererMarterer (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Peter PolanskyPolansky (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Quentin HalysHalys – Cem IlkelIlkel (2-6 7-62 6-1) – See score progression
- John-Patrick SmithSmith – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (2-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (6-1 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-2 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves (6-1 7-64) – See score progression
- Viktor TroickiTroicki – Ulises BlanchBlanch (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Max PurcellPurcell (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Peter PolanskyPolansky (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Robin HaaseHaase – Quentin HalysHalys (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernard TomicTomic – John-Patrick SmithSmith (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Borna GojoGojo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Viktor TroickiTroicki (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Alexandre MullerMuller (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Elias YmerYmer (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Tomas MachacMachac (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Mathias BourgueBourgue (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Michael MmohMmoh (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Mario Vilella MartinezVilella Martinez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – Dustin BrownBrown (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky (0-0) – H2H and prediction