Botic Van De Zandschulp and Mathias Bourgue will square off in the qualifications of the Australian Open Qualifying for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1. 30pm on Court A. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 5 sets.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.76
Mathias Bourgue -> 2.06
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Mathias Bourgue
This will be the 2nd time that Botic Van De Zandschulp and Mathias Bourgue square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Bourgue (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on hard.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Ranked no. 156, Van De Zandschulp reached the qualifications after defeating Lorenzo Musetti 3-6 6-1 6-4 and Joao Menezes 6-3 6-71 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Dutch defeated Lucas Magalhaes Hueb De Menezes (6-3 6-71 6-4). During the match Van De Zandschulp scored 114 points vs Lucas Magalhaes Hueb De Menezes’s 105. The Dutch was quite aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Talking about the service games, Van De Zandschulp managed to score 4 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Overall, Botic Van De Zandschulp was exceptionally effective on serve to win 72% (48/67) of his 1st serve and 56% (23/41) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Van De Zandschulp broke Lucas Magalhaes Hueb De Menezes 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Dutch has dropped 2 set in this event to conquer 53% of the points he played.
Van De Zandschulp has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 67% of his matches (197-97). 2-0 on hard in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Van De Zandschulp has a 13-7 match record in the last 7 years on hard.
Van De Zandschulp has a 2-0 win-loss record in 2021, 2-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year at the Australian Open Qualifying
The Dutch didn’t play at the Australian Open Qualifying in 2020.
Mathias Bourgue
Ranked no. 214, Mathias got to the qualifications after beating Ernesto Escobedo 7-65 6-2 and Blaz Rola 6-2 6-74 6-3.
In the qualifications, Mathias defeated Rola (6-2 6-74 6-3). During the match Bourgue scored 113 points vs Rola’s 95. Mathias was quite aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Talking about serving, Bourgue bagged 9 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Mathias Bourgue was pretty efficient on serve to win 72% (48/67) of his 1st serve and 63% (30/48) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Mathias broke Rola 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Bourgue has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Mathias has a 2-0 win-loss record in 2021, 2-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Bourgue |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 58 | 51 |
| Pts | 197-178 | 187-154 |
| Total Points | 375 | 341 |
| Winners | 77 | 78 |
| %Winners | 39% | 42% |
Both Van De Zandschulp and Bourgue played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Botic Van De Zandschulp conceded 2 sets, while Mathias Bourgue dropper 1 set. Van De Zandschulp has played 1 set more than Bourgue (6 vs 5). Therefore, Van De Zandschulp played 7 games more than Bourgue. Van De Zandschulp scored 77 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Mathias struck 78 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Bourgue |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 17 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 8.5 |
| 1st in | 104/177 | 102/174 |
| %1st in | 59% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 77/104 | 78/102 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 39/73 | 44/72 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 61% |
Van De Zandschulp managed to score 8 aces (4 per match). Bourgue fired 17 aces (8.5 per match). Van De Zandschulp won 74% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Bourgue won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Bourgue |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 5 |
| Converted | 7/18 | 5/10 |
| % Converted | 39% | 50% |
| Conceded | 9 | 8 |
| Saved | 6 | 8 |
| % Saved | 67% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
Botic broke his opponents 7 times with a 39% conversion rate. The Dutch dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The French player broke his opponents 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Mathias was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 8 break points.
| Van De Zandschulp | ||||
| Q1 Musetti | Q2 Lucas Magalhaes Hueb De Menezes | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | 6-3 6-71 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 32 | 58 | |
| pts | 83-73 | 114-105 | 197-178 | |
| Total points | 156 | 219 | 375 | |
| Winners | 29 | 48 | 77 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 42% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 7 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 37/69 | 67/108 | 104/177 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 62% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 29/37 | 48/67 | 77/104 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 72% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/32 | 23/41 | 39/73 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 56% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 3/10 | 7/18 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 30% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 7 | 9 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 6/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 86% | 43% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| Bourgue | ||||
| Q1 Escobedo | Q2 Rola | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-2 | 6-2 6-74 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 30 | 51 | |
| pts | 74-59 | 113-95 | 187-154 | |
| Total points | 133 | 208 | 341 | |
| Winners | 30 | 48 | 78 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 9 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 7 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 35/59 | 67/115 | 102/174 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 58% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 30/35 | 48/67 | 78/102 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 72% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/24 | 30/48 | 44/72 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 63% | 61% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 3/7 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 43% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 8/8 | 8 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores at the Australian Open Qualifying
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (6-1 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-2 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves (6-1 7-64) – See score progression
- Viktor TroickiTroicki – Ulises BlanchBlanch (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (6-4 1-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Hugo DellienDellien – Andrew HarrisHarris (6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Yannick MadenMaden (2-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (7-61 7-64) – See score progression
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Blaz RolaRola (6-2 6-74 6-3) – See score progression
- Mario Vilella MartinezVilella Martinez – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (w/o) – See score progression
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Steven DiezDiez (3-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Max PurcellPurcell (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Dustin BrownBrown – Carlos TabernerTaberner (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Joao MenezesMenezes (6-3 6-71 6-4) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Denis KudlaKudla (w/o) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Zhe LiLi (2-6 6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Robin HaaseHaase – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Maximilian MartererMarterer (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Peter PolanskyPolansky (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Julian LenzLenz (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (2-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Antoine HoangHoang (7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (1-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Rinky HijikataHijikata (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Borna GojoGojo – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (6-3 7-67) – See score progression
- Quentin HalysHalys – Cem IlkelIlkel (2-6 7-62 6-1) – See score progression
- John-Patrick SmithSmith – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (2-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Max PurcellPurcell (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Peter PolanskyPolansky (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Robin HaaseHaase – Quentin HalysHalys (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernard TomicTomic – John-Patrick SmithSmith (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Borna GojoGojo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Viktor TroickiTroicki (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Alexandre MullerMuller (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Elias YmerYmer (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Tomas MachacMachac (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Mathias BourgueBourgue (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Michael MmohMmoh (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Mario Vilella MartinezVilella Martinez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – Dustin BrownBrown (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky (0-0) – H2H and prediction