Mario Vilella Martinez and Tung-Lin Wu will face off in the qualifications of the Australian Open Qualifying for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11.30 am on Court A. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tung-Lin Wu who should win in 5 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tung-Lin Wu is the pick to win this match.
Tung-Lin Wu -> 1.48
Mario Vilella Martinez -> 2.65
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mario Vilella Martinez vs. Tung-Lin Wu
There is no head to head record between Mario Vilella Martinez and Tung-Lin Wu since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Mario Vilella Martinez
Ranked no. 186, the Spaniard reached the qualifications after beating Alessandro Giannessi 6-1 6-3 and Francisco Cerundolo w/o.
In the qualifications, The Spaniard defeated Cerundolo (w/o). During the match Vilella Martinez and Cerundolo scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 186 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match.
Regarding the service games, Vilella Martinez couldn’t to score even 1 ace throughout the encounter and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults. Mario Vilella Martinez conceded no breaks for the entire match to put NAN% of his first serves in, win NAN% (/) of the points behind his 1st serve and NAN% (/) on the 2nd serve.
Vilella Martinez has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 64% of his matches (239-133). 1-0 on hard in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Vilella Martinez has a 31-25 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
Vilella Martinez has a 1-0 win-loss record in 2021, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Tung-Lin Wu
Ranked no. 247, Tung-Lin got to the qualifications after defeating Jay Clarke 6-2 6-4 and Ramkumar Ramanathan 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Chinese had a good straight sets win against Ramanathan (6-3 6-2). During the match Wu scored 61 points vs Ramanathan’s 40. Wu was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Wu bagged 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Tung-Lin Wu was quite efficient on serve to win 82% (28/34) of his 1st serve and 75% (9/12) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Chinese broke Ramanathan 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Chinese hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Tung-Lin has a 2-0 win-loss record in 2021, 2-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Vilella Martinez | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 35 |
| Pts | 57-31 | 138-109 |
| Total Points | 88 | 247 |
| Winners | 19 | 66 |
| %Winners | 33% | 48% |
Vilella Martinez played 1 match while Wu competed in 2 matches. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Vilella Martinez has played 2 set(s) less than Wu (2 vs 4). Therefore, Vilella Martinez played 19 games less than Wu. The Spaniard scored 19 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Wu blasted 66 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Vilella Martinez | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 2.5 |
| 1st in | 21/35 | 90/123 |
| %1st in | 60% | 73% |
| 1st pts | 19/21 | 66/90 |
| %1st pts | 90% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 13/14 | 19/33 |
| %2nd pts | 93% | 58% |
Vilella Martinez recorded 10 aces . Wu recorded 5 aces (2.5 per match). Vilella Martinez won 90% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 93% of the points. On the other side, Wu won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Vilella Martinez | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 6 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 6/17 |
| % Converted | 44% | 35% |
| Conceded | 0 | 8 |
| Saved | 0 | 8 |
| % Saved | NAN% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
The Spaniard broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Vilella Martinez was rock solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Chinese broke his opponents 6 times with a 35% conversion rate. Tung-Lin was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 8 break points.
| Vilella Martinez | ||||
| Q1 Giannessi |
Q2 Cerundolo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | w/o | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 0 | 16 | |
| pts | 57-31 | – | 57-31 | |
| Total points | 88 | 0 | 88 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | ||
| %Winners | 33% | NAN% | 33% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 10 | 0 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1st in | 21/35 | / | 21/35 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | NAN% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 19/21 | / | 19/21 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | NAN% | 90% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/14 | / | 13/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 93% | NAN% | 93% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | ||
| Converted | 4/9 | / | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | NAN% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | ||
| Wu | ||||
| Q1 Clarke |
Q2 Ramanathan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 17 | 35 | |
| pts | 77-69 | 61-40 | 138-109 | |
| Total points | 146 | 101 | 247 | |
| Winners | 38 | 28 | 66 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 46% | 48% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 56/77 | 34/46 | 90/123 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 74% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 38/56 | 28/34 | 66/90 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 82% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/21 | 9/12 | 19/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 75% | 58% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 3/7 | 6/17 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 43% | 35% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 1 | 8 | |
| Saved | 7/7 | 1/1 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWLWLLWWL Tennis Scores at the Australian Open Qualifying
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (6-1 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-2 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves (6-1 7-64) – See score progression
- Viktor TroickiTroicki – Ulises BlanchBlanch (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (6-4 1-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Hugo DellienDellien – Andrew HarrisHarris (6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Yannick MadenMaden (2-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (7-61 7-64) – See score progression
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Blaz RolaRola (6-2 6-74 6-3) – See score progression
- Mario Vilella MartinezVilella Martinez – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (w/o) – See score progression
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Steven DiezDiez (3-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Max PurcellPurcell (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Dustin BrownBrown – Carlos TabernerTaberner (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Joao MenezesMenezes (6-3 6-71 6-4) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Denis KudlaKudla (w/o) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Zhe LiLi (2-6 6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Robin HaaseHaase – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Maximilian MartererMarterer (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Peter PolanskyPolansky (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Julian LenzLenz (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (2-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Antoine HoangHoang (7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (1-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Rinky HijikataHijikata (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Borna GojoGojo – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (6-3 7-67) – See score progression
- Quentin HalysHalys – Cem IlkelIlkel (2-6 7-62 6-1) – See score progression
- John-Patrick SmithSmith – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (2-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Max PurcellPurcell (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Peter PolanskyPolansky (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Robin HaaseHaase – Quentin HalysHalys (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernard TomicTomic – John-Patrick SmithSmith (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Borna GojoGojo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Viktor TroickiTroicki (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Alexandre MullerMuller (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Elias YmerYmer (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Tomas MachacMachac (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Mathias BourgueBourgue (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Michael MmohMmoh (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Mario Vilella MartinezVilella Martinez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – Dustin BrownBrown (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky (0-0) – H2H and prediction
