Umut Akkoyun and Marsel Ilhan will play each other in the 2nd round of the Antalya (M15) for the 1st time in their career. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marsel Ilhan who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Marsel Ilhan is the pick to win this match.
Marsel Ilhan -> 1.055
Umut Akkoyun -> 8.6
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Umut Akkoyun vs. Marsel Ilhan
There is no head to head record between Umut Akkoyun and Marsel Ilhan since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Umut Akkoyun
The Turk got to the 2nd round after defeating Can Aydin 6-0 6-0, Martin Dimitrov 3-6 6-3 10-7 and Pavle Daljev 6-3 7-63.
In the 1st round, Akkoyun had a good straight sets win against Daljev (6-3 7-63). During the match Akkoyun scored 77 points vs Daljev’s 62. Akkoyun was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Akkoyun fired 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Umut Akkoyun lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Akkoyun put 63% of his first serves in, winning 72% (26/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (10/21) on the 2nd serve. Akkoyun broke Daljev 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Akkoyun has a negative record in the last 3 years having won 27% of his matches (14-37). 6-12 on clay in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Akkoyun has a 14-36 win-loss record in the last 3 years on clay.
Umut has a 6-12 win-loss record in 2020, 6-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Marsel Ilhan
Ranked no. 575, Marsel got to the 2nd round after defeating Timur Kiuamov 2-6 7-64 6-4.
In the 1st round against Kiuamov, Ilhan recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 7-64 6-4).-93) than Kiuamov. In fact, the world no. won 93 points vs Kiuamov’s. That means that Ilhan was more focused during the important points. Marsel was pretty aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about serving, Ilhan recorded 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Marsel Ilhan lost the serve 6 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Ilhan put 64% of his first serves in, winning 61% (41/67) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (16/37) on the 2nd serve. The Turk broke Kiuamov 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
The Turk has a 6-8 win-loss record in 2020, 5-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Akkoyun | Ilhan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 62 | 31 |
| Pts | 77-62 | 93-99 |
| Total Points | 139 | 192 |
| Winners | 26 | 41 |
| %Winners | 34% | 44% |
Akkoyun played 3 matches while Ilhan competed in 1 match. Akkoyun started his run from the qualifications while Ilhan had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Umut Akkoyun conceded 1 set, while Marsel Ilhan dropper 1 set. Akkoyun has played 4 sets more than Ilhan (7 vs 3). Therefore, Akkoyun played 31 games more than Ilhan. Akkoyun scored 26 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, The Turk scored 41 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Akkoyun | Ilhan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 0.7 | 6 |
| 1st in | 36/57 | 67/104 |
| %1st in | 63% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 26/36 | 41/67 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 61% |
| 2nd pts | 10/21 | 16/37 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 43% |
Akkoyun blasted 2 aces (0.7 per match). Ilhan scored 6 aces . Akkoyun won 72% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Ilhan won 61% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Akkoyun | Ilhan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/7 |
| % Converted | 63% | 71% |
| Conceded | 5 | 11 |
| Saved | 2 | 5 |
| % Saved | 40% | 45% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 6 |
Akkoyun broke his opponents 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. The Turk lost his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded. Ilhan broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. The Turk conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 45% of the break points that he conceded.
| Akkoyun | |||||
| Q2 Aydin |
Q3 Dimitrov |
R1 Daljev |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-0 | 3-6 6-3 10-7 | 6-3 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 12 | 28 | 22 | 62 | |
| pts | – | – | 77-62 | 77-62 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | 139 | 139 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |||
| %Winners | NAN% | NAN% | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1st in | / | / | 36/57 | 36/57 | |
| % 1st in | NAN% | NAN% | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | / | / | 26/36 | 26/36 | |
| % 1st pts | NAN% | NAN% | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | / | / | 10/21 | 10/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | NAN% | NAN% | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |||
| Converted | / | / | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | NAN% | NAN% | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |||
| Saved | 0/ | 0/ | 2/5 | 2 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 40% | 13% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |||
| Ilhan | |||||
| R1 Kiuamov |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 7-64 6-4 | ||||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |||
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |||
| pts | 93-99 | 93-99 | |||
| Total points | 192 | 192 | |||
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |||
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |||
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |||
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1st in | 67/104 | 67/104 | |||
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |||
| 1st pts | 41/67 | 41/67 | |||
| % 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |||
| 2nd pts | 16/37 | 16/37 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |||
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |||
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |||
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |||
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |||
| Saved | 5/11 | 5 | |||
| Saved % | 45% | 15% | |||
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 | |||
Head 2 Head
LLLWLWWL
LWWWWLWLWW Tennis Scores in M15 Antalya
- Ivan NedelkoNedelko – Mert Naci TurkerNaci Turker (7-5 2-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Georgii KravchenkoKravchenko – Taiyo YamanakaYamanaka (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Baran CengizCengiz – Bora SengulSengul (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Benjamin DhoeDhoe (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Yanki ErelErel – Ilya SnitariSnitari (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Umut AkkoyunAkkoyun – Pavle DaljevDaljev (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Marsel IlhanIlhan – Timur KiuamovKiuamov (2-6 7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Khumoun SultanovSultanov – Aleksandr BrayninBraynin (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Vasil DimitrovDimitrov – Danylo VeremeychukVeremeychuk (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Vladislav IvanovIvanov – Peter MakkMakk (2-6 7-62 6-0) – See score progression
- Vladyslav OrlovOrlov – Berk IlkelIlkel (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Cengiz AksuAksu – Sarp AgabigunAgabigun (3-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Alexandar LazarovLazarov – Romain FauconFaucon (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Michalis SakellaridisSakellaridis – David BogatinBogatin (3-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Luciano DarderiDarderi – Emir SendoganSendogan (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Alejo Lorenzo Lingua LavallenLorenzo Lingua Lavallen – Sergey FominFomin (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Khumoun SultanovSultanov – Cengiz AksuAksu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Vladislav IvanovIvanov – Billy HarrisHarris (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandar LazarovLazarov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yanki ErelErel – Alejo Lorenzo Lingua LavallenLorenzo Lingua Lavallen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marsel IlhanIlhan – Umut AkkoyunAkkoyun (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Georgii KravchenkoKravchenko – Baran CengizCengiz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michalis SakellaridisSakellaridis – Ivan NedelkoNedelko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
