Nerman Fatic and Paul Jubb will face off in the quarter of the Antalya (M15) for the 1st time in their career. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nerman Fatic who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nerman Fatic is the pick to win this match.
Nerman Fatic -> 1.34
Paul Jubb -> 3.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nerman Fatic vs. Paul Jubb
There is no head to head record between Nerman Fatic and Paul Jubb since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Nerman Fatic
Ranked no. 388, the Bosnian got to the quarter after defeating Admir Kalender 6-2 7-64 and Mikhail Fufygin 6-1 6-2.
In the 2nd round, The Bosnian had a good straight sets win against Fufygin (6-1 6-2). During the match Fatic scored 58 points vs Fufygin’s 34. Nerman was quite aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about the service games, Fatic was unable to score even 1 ace during the match and he committed only 1 double fault. Nerman Fatic was very efficent on serve to win 87% (20/23) of his 1st serve and 56% (9/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Nerman broke Fufygin 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Nerman hasn’t lost yet a set in this event to conquer 59% of the points he played.
Fatic has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 60% of his matches (204-136). 8-0 on clay in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Fatic has a 164-99 match record in the last 6 years on clay.
The Bosnian’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in M15 Antalya.
The Bosnian has a 10-2 win-loss record in 2020, 8-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Antalya (M15)
Nerman lost in the 1st round to Nik Razborsek.
Paul Jubb
Ranked no. 538, Paul got to the quarter after beating Luciano Darderi 6-3 6-0 and Marsel Ilhan 7-65 4-6 7-64.
In the 2nd round, Paul defeated Ilhan (7-65 4-6 7-64).-119) than Ilhan. In fact, the world no. 388 won 119 points vs Ilhan’s. That means that Jubb was more focused during the important points. Paul was pretty aggressive to blast 49 winners.
Talking about serving, Jubb scored 3 aces and he was not very consistent on his 2nd serve to score 12 double faults. Paul Jubb lost the serve 3 times and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Jubb put 59% of his first serves in, winning 65% (49/75) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (27/52) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Ilhan twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jubb has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Jubb has a 4-1 win-loss record in 2020, 4-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Antalya (M15)
Paul didn’t play in Antalya (M15) in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Fatic | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 36 | 51 |
| Pts | 127-89 | 189-171 |
| Total Points | 216 | 360 |
| Winners | 45 | 76 |
| %Winners | 35% | 40% |
Both Fatic and Jubb played 2 matches. At the moment, Paul Jubb surrendered 1 set while Nerman Fatic hasn’t conceded a set so far. Fatic has played 1 set(s) less than Jubb (4 vs 5). Therefore, Fatic played 15 games less than Jubb. Fatic scored 45 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit scored 76 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Fatic | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 2 |
| 1st in | 60/103 | 115/191 |
| %1st in | 58% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 45/60 | 76/115 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 27/43 | 39/76 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 51% |
Fatic made 4 aces (2 per match). Jubb struck 4 aces (2 per match). Fatic won 75% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Jubb won 66% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Fatic | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 7 |
| Converted | 9/14 | 7/10 |
| % Converted | 64% | 70% |
| Conceded | 4 | 20 |
| Saved | 2 | 17 |
| % Saved | 50% | 85% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Nerman broke his opponents 9 times with a 64% conversion rate. The Bosnian surrendered his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Paul broke his opponents 7 times with a 70% conversion rate. Jubb conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 85% of the break points that he conceded.
| Fatic | ||||
| R1 Kalender |
R2 Fufygin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-64 | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 15 | 36 | |
| pts | 69-55 | 58-34 | 127-89 | |
| Total points | 124 | 92 | 216 | |
| Winners | 25 | 20 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 34% | 35% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 37/64 | 23/39 | 60/103 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 59% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 25/37 | 20/23 | 45/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 87% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/27 | 9/16 | 27/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 56% | 63% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 5/10 | 9/14 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 50% | 64% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 0/0 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | – | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Jubb | ||||
| R1 Darderi |
R2 Ilhan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 | 7-65 4-6 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 36 | 51 | |
| pts | 70-51 | 119-120 | 189-171 | |
| Total points | 121 | 239 | 360 | |
| Winners | 27 | 49 | 76 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 41% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 12 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 40/64 | 75/127 | 115/191 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 59% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 27/40 | 49/75 | 76/115 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 65% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/24 | 27/52 | 39/76 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 52% | 51% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 2 | 7 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 2/3 | 7/10 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 67% | 70% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 12 | 20 | |
| Saved | 8/8 | 9/12 | 17 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 75% | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLWWWLL
LWWWWWLLWL Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tadeas ParoulekParoulek – Bora SengulSengul (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oleksandr OvcharenkoOvcharenko – Georgii KravchenkoKravchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan NedelkoNedelko – Alejo Lorenzo Lingua LavallenLorenzo Lingua Lavallen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cezar Cretu (ROU)Cretu (ROU) – Vladyslav OrlovOrlov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
