Hernan Casanova and Gonzalo Lama will play each other in the qualifications of the Guayaquil Challenger for the 3rd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 11:30 am on COURT 9 RAUL VIVER. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hernan Casanova who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hernan Casanova is the pick to win this match.
Hernan Casanova -> 1.615
Gonzalo Lama -> 2.19
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Hernan Casanova vs. Gonzalo Lama
This will be the 3rd time that Hernan Casanova and Gonzalo Lama face off. The head to head is 2-0 for Casanova (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on clay.
Hernan Casanova
Ranked no. 377, Casanova reached the qualifications after beating Rafael Matos 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, Casanova had a good straight sets win against Matos (6-3 6-3). During the match Casanova scored 59 points vs Matos’s 49. Hernan was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Casanova was unable to score even 1 ace in the match and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults. Hernan Casanova lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Casanova put 75% of his first serves in, winning 65% (30/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (7/15) on the 2nd serve. Hernan broke Matos 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Casanova has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 67% of his matches (200-97). 8-4 on clay in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Casanova has a 200-96 win-loss record in the last 5 years on clay.
The Argentine’s best result of the season was getting to the semi-finals in M25 Hurlingham.
Hernan has a 8-4 win-loss record in 2020, 8-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Guayaquil Challenger
Hernan didn’t compete in the Guayaquil Challenger in 2019.
Gonzalo Lama
Ranked no. 786, Gonzalo got to the qualifications after beating Carlos Gomez-Herrera 4-6 6-4 7-5.
In the qualifications against Gomez-Herrera, The Chilean recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 7-5). During the match Lama scored 103 points vs Gomez-Herrera’s 99. Lama was exceptionally aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Talking about serving, Lama bagged 18 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Gonzalo Lama was quite efficent on serve to win 73% (45/62) of his 1st serve and 62% (23/37) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Chilean broke Gomez-Herrera twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).
Lama’s best result of the current year was reaching the semi-finals in M25 Klosters.
Lama has a 19-12 win-loss record in 2020, 18-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Casanova | Lama |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 32 |
| Pts | 59-49 | 103-99 |
| Total Points | 108 | 202 |
| Winners | 30 | 45 |
| %Winners | 51% | 44% |
Both Casanova and Lama played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Gonzalo Lama conceded 1 set while Hernan Casanova hasn’t conceded a set so far. Casanova has played 1 set(s) less than Lama (2 vs 3). Therefore, Casanova played 14 games less than Lama. Hernan scored 30 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, Gonzalo managed to score 45 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Casanova | Lama |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 18 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 18 |
| 1st in | 46/61 | 62/99 |
| %1st in | 75% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 30/46 | 45/62 |
| %1st pts | 65% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 7/15 | 23/37 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 62% |
Casanova didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Lama made 18 aces . Casanova won 65% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Lama won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Casanova | Lama |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 2 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 2/8 |
| % Converted | 71% | 25% |
| Conceded | 9 | 7 |
| Saved | 7 | 6 |
| % Saved | 78% | 86% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Casanova broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Casanova dropped his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. Lama broke his opponent twice with a 25% conversion rate. Gonzalo conceded his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
| Casanova | |||
| Q1 Matos |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 59-49 | 59-49 | |
| Total points | 108 | 108 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 46/61 | 46/61 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 30/46 | 30/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/15 | 7/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Lama | |||
| Q1 Gomez-Herrera |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 103-99 | 103-99 | |
| Total points | 202 | 202 | |
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 18 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 62/99 | 62/99 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 45/62 | 45/62 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/37 | 23/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/8 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLWWWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Pedro SousaSousa – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrej MartinMartin – Roberto Ortega-OlmedoOrtega-Olmedo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Diego HidalgoHidalgo – Gonzalo EscobarEscobar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo MenaMena – Emilio GomezGomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gonzalo LamaLama – Hernan CasanovaCasanova (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jelle SelsSels – Renzo OlivoOlivo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joao MenezesMenezes – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas AlvarezAlvarez – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Pedja KrstinKrstin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cayetano MarchMarch – Christian LindellLindell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Pedro SakamotoSakamoto (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian BaezBaez – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
