Mathias Bourgue and Jack Draper will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Bratislava Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 1:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jack Draper who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jack Draper is the pick to win this match.
Jack Draper -> 1.74
Mathias Bourgue -> 2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mathias Bourgue vs. Jack Draper
There is no head to head record between Mathias Bourgue and Jack Draper since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Mathias Bourgue
Ranked no. 221, Mathias got to the qualifications after defeating Tobias Simon 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, the French player had a good straight sets win against Simon (6-4 6-2). During the match Bourgue scored 65 points vs Simon’s 50. Bourgue was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Bourgue made 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Mathias Bourgue was pretty efficent on serve to win 82% (27/33) of his 1st serve and 65% (11/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Mathias broke Simon 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Bourgue has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (345-226). 6-5 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Bourgue has a 47-42 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Mathias’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Iasi Challenger.
Mathias has a 15-14 win-loss record in 2020, 6-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Bratislava Challenger
the French player lost in the 1st round to Lukas Rosol.
Jack Draper
Ranked no. 297, Jack reached the qualifications after defeating Elmar Ejupovic 6-2 7-65.
In the qualifications, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Ejupovic (6-2 7-65). During the match Draper scored 76 points vs Ejupovic’s 62. Draper was very aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about serving, Draper scored 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Jack Draper lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Draper put 71% of his first serves in, winning 77% (37/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (10/20) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Ejupovic 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
The Brit’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Glasgow and M25 Sunderland.
The Brit has a 17-5 win-loss record in 2020, 14-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Bratislava Challenger
The Brit didn’t play in the Bratislava Challenger in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Bourgue | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 21 |
| Pts | 65-50 | 76-62 |
| Total Points | 115 | 138 |
| Winners | 27 | 37 |
| %Winners | 42% | 49% |
Both Bourgue and Draper played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Bourgue and Draper have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Bourgue played 3 games less than Draper. Mathias scored 27 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Draper bagged 37 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Bourgue | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 7 |
| 1st in | 33/50 | 48/68 |
| %1st in | 66% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 27/33 | 37/48 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 11/17 | 10/20 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 50% |
Bourgue struck 8 aces . Draper made 7 aces . Bourgue won 82% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Draper won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Bourgue | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/10 | 3/9 |
| % Converted | 30% | 33% |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | NAN% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Mathias broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. Bourgue extremely effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. Draper broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Jack conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Bourgue | |||
| Q1 Simon |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 65-50 | 65-50 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 33/50 | 33/50 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 27/33 | 27/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/17 | 11/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 3/10 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Draper | |||
| Q1 Ejupovic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 76-62 | 76-62 | |
| Total points | 138 | 138 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 48/68 | 48/68 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 37/48 | 37/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/20 | 10/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLLWWLW
WWWWWLLLWL Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas LackoLacko – Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yannick MadenMaden – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Blaz RolaRola – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico GaioGaio – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip HoranskyHoransky – Lukas KleinKlein (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Jack DraperDraper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brayden SchnurSchnur – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Johannes HaerteisHaerteis – Julian LenzLenz (2-4) – H2H and prediction
- Quentin HalysHalys – Antoine HoangHoang (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Liam BroadyBroady (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Alex MolcanMolcan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Steven DiezDiez (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – Roberto MarcoraMarcora (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Matteo ViolaViola (0-0) – H2H and prediction
