![Prediction And Head To Head Veronica Cepede Royg Vs. Hailey Baptiste Rd2g48zs5m Prediction and head to head Veronica Cepede Royg vs. Hailey Baptiste](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Veronica-Cepede-Royg-vs.-Hailey-Baptiste-RD2G48Zs5M.jpg)
Veronica Cepede Royg and Hailey Baptiste will face off in the qualifications of Charleston (W100) for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 11.30 am on Court 3. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Veronica Cepede Royg who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Veronica Cepede Royg is the pick to win this match.
Veronica Cepede Royg -> 1.36
Hailey Baptiste -> 2.94
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Veronica Cepede Royg vs. Hailey Baptiste
This will be the 2nd time that Veronica Cepede Royg and Hailey Baptiste square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Cepede Royg (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
Veronica Cepede Royg
Ranked no. 173, the Paraguayan reached the qualifications after defeating Panna Udvardy 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, Veronica had a good straight sets win against Udvardy (6-4 6-3). During the match Cepede Royg scored 77 points vs Udvardy’s 67. The Paraguayan was very aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Cepede Royg wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she was very consistent in conceding no double faults. Veronica Cepede Royg lost the serve 3 times and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Cepede Royg put 74% of her first serves in, winning 60% (31/52) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (9/18) on the 2nd serve. Veronica broke Udvardy 5 times after converting 50% of her break points (5/10).
Cepede Royg has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 60% of her matches (344-226). 4-0 on clay in 2020. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Cepede Royg has a 207-99 match record in the last years on clay.
Cepede Royg has a 12-9 win-loss record in 2020, 4-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Charleston (W100)
Cepede Royg had to surrender in the 2nd round to Cori Gauff.
Hailey Baptiste
Ranked no. 245, Baptiste got to the qualifications after beating Robin Anderson 6-1 7-5.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Anderson (6-1 7-5). During the match Baptiste scored 82 points vs Anderson’s 68. Hailey was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Baptiste scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she committed only 6 double faults. Hailey Baptiste lost the serve twice and she saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Baptiste put 53% of her first serves in, winning 65% (30/46) of the points behind her 1st serve and 51% (21/41) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Anderson 5 times after converting 45% of her break points (5/11).
The American’s best result of the season was getting to the semi-finals in the W25 Rancho Santa Fe.
Baptiste has a 7-9 win-loss record in 2020, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Charleston (W100)
Baptiste didn’t play in the Charleston (W100) in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Cepede Royg | Baptiste |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 |
Pts | 77-67 | 82-68 |
Total Points | 144 | 150 |
Winners | 31 | 30 |
%Winners | 40% | 37% |
Both Cepede Royg and Baptiste played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Cepede Royg and Baptiste have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (19). The Paraguayan scored 31 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Baptiste blasted 30 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Cepede Royg | Baptiste |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 1 |
Avg per match | 0 | 1 |
1st in | 52/70 | 46/87 |
%1st in | 74% | 53% |
1st pts | 31/52 | 30/46 |
%1st pts | 60% | 65% |
2nd pts | 9/18 | 21/41 |
%2nd pts | 50% | 51% |
Cepede Royg didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Baptiste managed to score 1 ace . Cepede Royg won 60% points behind her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Baptiste won 65% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Cepede Royg | Baptiste |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 5 |
Converted | 5/10 | 5/11 |
% Converted | 50% | 45% |
Conceded | 7 | 13 |
Saved | 4 | 11 |
% Saved | 57% | 85% |
Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
The Paraguayan broke her opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Veronica surrendered her serve 3 times and she saved 57% of the break points that she conceded. Baptiste broke her opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. The American conceded her serve twice and she saved 85% of the break points that she conceded.
Cepede Royg | |||
Q1 Udvardy |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 77-67 | 77-67 | |
Total points | 144 | 144 | |
Winners | 31 | 31 | |
%Winners | 40% | 40% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 52/70 | 52/70 | |
% 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
1st pts | 31/52 | 31/52 | |
% 1st pts | 60% | 60% | |
2nd pts | 9/18 | 9/18 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Baptiste | |||
Q1 Anderson |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 82-68 | 82-68 | |
Total points | 150 | 150 | |
Winners | 30 | 30 | |
%Winners | 37% | 37% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
1st in | 46/87 | 46/87 | |
% 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
1st pts | 30/46 | 30/46 | |
% 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
2nd pts | 21/41 | 21/41 | |
% 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
Saved | 11/13 | 11 | |
Saved % | 85% | 85% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Paula OrmaecheaOrmaechea (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bethanie Mattek-SandsMattek-Sands – Anna DanilinaDanilina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mayar SherifSherif – Harmony TanTan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Veronica Cepede RoygCepede Royg – Hailey BaptisteBaptiste (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ankita RainaRaina – Claire LiuLiu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kateryna BondarenkoBondarenko – Marie BenoitBenoit (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano – Kyoka OkamuraOkamura (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tessah AndrianjafitrimoAndrianjafitrimo – Gabriela TalabaTalaba (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline DolehideDolehide – Kristie AhnAhn (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Misaki DoiDoi – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sara ErraniErrani – Caty McNallyMcNally (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Whitney OsuigweOsuigwe – Ann LiLi (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam – Emma NavarroNavarro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olga GovortsovaGovortsova – Madison BrengleBrengle (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliona BolsovaBolsova – Catherine Cartan BellisCartan Bellis (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kennedy ShafferShaffer – Katarzyna KawaKawa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – Lauren DavisDavis (0-0) – H2H and prediction