Taro Daniel and Maximilian Marterer will square off in the 2nd round of the Hamburg Challenger for the 4th time of their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:30 am on COURT 3. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Maximilian Marterer who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Maximilian Marterer is the pick to win this match.
Maximilian Marterer -> 1.36
Taro Daniel -> 3.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Taro Daniel vs. Maximilian Marterer
This will be the 4th time that Taro Daniel and Maximilian Marterer face off. The head to head is 2-1 for Daniel (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they locked horns, Daniel won 6-3 6-1 in the qualifications in Hamburg back in 2015.
Taro Daniel
Ranked no. 122, Taro got to the qualifications after beating Arthur Rinderknech 6-3 3-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, Taro defeated Rinderknech (6-3 3-6 6-4). During the match Daniel scored 83 points vs Rinderknech’s 76. Daniel was exceptionally aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about the service games, Daniel struck 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Taro Daniel was pretty efficent on serve to win 75% (38/51) of his 1st serve and 59% (17/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Daniel broke Rinderknech 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Daniel has a favorable record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (411-285). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Daniel has a 29-27 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Taro’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Burnie Challenger.
The Japanese has a 13-14 win-loss record in 2020, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Hamburg Challenger
The Japanese didn’t play in the Hamburg Challenger in 2019.
Maximilian Marterer
Ranked no. 249, Maximilian got to the qualifications after defeating Maxime Cressy 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Maximilian had a good straight sets win against Cressy (6-4 6-4). During the match Marterer scored 64 points vs Cressy’s 55. Marterer was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Marterer fired 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Maximilian Marterer was extremely effective on serve to win 73% (29/40) of his 1st serve and 71% (17/24) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Maximilian was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Cressy twice.
Marterer has a 15-11 win-loss record in 2020, 4-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Hamburg Challenger
Maximilian didn’t compete in the Hamburg Challenger in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Daniel | Marterer |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 28 | 20 |
Pts | 83-76 | 64-55 |
Total Points | 159 | 119 |
Winners | 38 | 29 |
%Winners | 46% | 45% |
Both Daniel and Marterer played 1 match. At the moment, Taro Daniel dropped 1 set while Maximilian Marterer hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Daniel has played 1 set more than Marterer (3 vs 2). Therefore, Daniel played 8 games more than Marterer. Taro scored 38 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Maximilian struck 29 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Daniel | Marterer |
---|---|---|
Aces | 6 | 5 |
Avg per match | 6 | 5 |
1st in | 51/80 | 40/64 |
%1st in | 64% | 63% |
1st pts | 38/51 | 29/40 |
%1st pts | 75% | 73% |
2nd pts | 17/29 | 17/24 |
%2nd pts | 59% | 71% |
Daniel blasted 6 aces . Marterer fired 5 aces . Daniel won 75% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Marterer won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 71% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Daniel | Marterer |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 2 |
Converted | 3/5 | 2/2 |
% Converted | 60% | 100% |
Conceded | 7 | 3 |
Saved | 5 | 3 |
% Saved | 71% | 100% |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Taro broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Daniel lost his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Maximilian broke his opponent twice with a 100% conversion rate. The German was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
Daniel | |||
R1 Rinderknech |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
pts | 83-76 | 83-76 | |
Total points | 159 | 159 | |
Winners | 38 | 38 | |
%Winners | 46% | 46% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 51/80 | 51/80 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
1st pts | 38/51 | 38/51 | |
% 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 17/29 | 17/29 | |
% 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Marterer | |||
R1 Cressy |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 64-55 | 64-55 | |
Total points | 119 | 119 | |
Winners | 29 | 29 | |
%Winners | 45% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 40/64 | 40/64 | |
% 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
1st pts | 29/40 | 29/40 | |
% 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 17/24 | 17/24 | |
% 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/2 | 2/2 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Hamburg Challenger
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Filip HoranskyHoransky (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Pavel KotovKotov – Borna GojoGojo (6-4 6-76 7-5) – See score progression
- Tobias KamkeKamke – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (3-6 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Matthias BachingerBachinger (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Maxime CressyCressy (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (6-3 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (6-3 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Yannick MadenMaden – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Roberto MarcoraMarcora (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Hugo GastonGaston – Sumit NagalNagal (7-5 4-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Lukas LackoLacko (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Dustin BrownBrown (7-66 6-2) – See score progression
- Tobias KamkeKamke – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (3-6 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Tobias KamkeKamke (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oscar OtteOtte – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Taro DanielDaniel (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MasurMasur – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Benjamin BonziBonzi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Hugo GastonGaston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Yannick MadenMaden (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (0-0) – H2H and prediction