Kamil Majchrzak and Yannick Maden will play each other in the 2nd round of the Hamburg Challenger for the 4th time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:30 am on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kamil Majchrzak who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kamil Majchrzak is the pick to win this match.
Kamil Majchrzak -> 1.55
Yannick Maden -> 2.39
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kamil Majchrzak vs. Yannick Maden
This will be the 4th time that Kamil Majchrzak and Yannick Maden face off. The head to head is 2-1 for Maden (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played, Maden won 6-3 0-6 6-3 in the qualifications in the Rome Challenger back in 2017.
Kamil Majchrzak
Ranked no. 105, Kamil got to the qualifications after defeating Roberto Marcora 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Pole had a good straight sets win against Marcora (6-3 6-3). During the match Majchrzak scored 65 points vs Marcora’s 45. Kamil was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Majchrzak bagged 3 aces and he was exceptionally solid in conceding no double faults. Kamil Majchrzak was quite efficent on serve to win 90% (28/31) of his 1st serve and 55% (11/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Pole broke Marcora 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Majchrzak has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 63% of his matches (272-162). 1-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Majchrzak has a 24-18 record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
Majchrzak’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Prostejov Challenger.
Majchrzak has a 7-7 win-loss record in 2020, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Hamburg Challenger
The Pole didn’t compete in the Hamburg Challenger in 2019.
Yannick Maden
Ranked no. 166, the German reached the qualifications after beating Kimmer Coppejans 6-0 6-1.
In the 1st round, Maden had a good straight sets win against Coppejans (6-0 6-1). During the match Maden scored 51 points vs Coppejans’s 21. The German was pretty aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Talking about serving, Maden blasted 4 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Yannick Maden was quite effective on serve to win 74% (17/23) of his 1st serve and 75% (9/12) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The German broke Coppejans 6 times after converting 60% of his break points (6/10).
Maden has a 10-13 win-loss record in 2020, 4-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Hamburg Challenger
The German didn’t play in the Hamburg Challenger in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Majchrzak | Maden |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 13 |
| Pts | 65-45 | 51-21 |
| Total Points | 110 | 72 |
| Winners | 28 | 17 |
| %Winners | 43% | 33% |
Both Majchrzak and Maden played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Majchrzak and Maden have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Majchrzak played 5 games more than Maden. Kamil scored 28 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Maden managed to score 17 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Majchrzak | Maden |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 4 |
| 1st in | 31/51 | 23/35 |
| %1st in | 61% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 28/31 | 17/23 |
| %1st pts | 90% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 9/12 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 75% |
Majchrzak fired 3 aces . Maden struck 4 aces . Majchrzak won 90% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Maden won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 75% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Majchrzak | Maden |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 6 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 6/10 |
| % Converted | 75% | 60% |
| Conceded | 2 | 1 |
| Saved | 2 | 0 |
| % Saved | 100% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Kamil broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Majchrzak was rock solid on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 2 break points. The German broke his opponent 6 times with a 60% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Majchrzak | |||
| R1 Marcora |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 65-45 | 65-45 | |
| Total points | 110 | 110 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 31/51 | 31/51 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 28/31 | 28/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 90% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 11/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Maden | |||
| R1 Coppejans |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 51-21 | 51-21 | |
| Total points | 72 | 72 | |
| Winners | 17 | 17 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 23/35 | 23/35 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 17/23 | 17/23 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/12 | 9/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 75% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 6/10 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWLLWWL
Tennis Scores in Hamburg Challenger
- Tobias KamkeKamke – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (3-6 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Matthias BachingerBachinger (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Filip HoranskyHoransky (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Pavel KotovKotov – Borna GojoGojo (6-4 6-76 7-5) – See score progression
- Hugo GastonGaston – Sumit NagalNagal (7-5 4-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Yannick MadenMaden – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Roberto MarcoraMarcora (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Maxime CressyCressy (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Lukas LackoLacko (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Dustin BrownBrown (7-66 6-2) – See score progression
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (6-3 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (6-3 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Tobias KamkeKamke – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (3-6 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Tobias KamkeKamke (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oscar OtteOtte – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Taro DanielDaniel (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MasurMasur – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Benjamin BonziBonzi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Hugo GastonGaston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Yannick MadenMaden (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
