Botic Van De Zandschulp and Marc-Andrea Huesler will clash against each other in the final of the Ismaning Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 2:00 pm on CENTRE. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.78
Marc-Andrea Huesler -> 2.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Marc-Andrea Huesler
There is no head to head record between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Marc-Andrea Huesler since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Ranked no. 174, the Dutch got to the final after beating Juan Pablo Varillas 6-0 6-1, Ramkumar Ramanathan 6-2 6-2, Tobias Kamke 6-3 3-6 7-69 and Prajnesh Gunneswaran 7-66 6-1.
In the semifinal, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Gunneswaran (7-66 6-1). During the match Van De Zandschulp scored 76 points vs Gunneswaran’s 58. Van De Zandschulp was very aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Van De Zandschulp fired 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Botic Van De Zandschulp was pretty efficent on serve to win 83% (33/40) of his 1st serve and 68% (13/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Van De Zandschulp broke Gunneswaran twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Dutch has conceded 1 set in this event to conquer 58% of the points he played.
Van De Zandschulp has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 67% of his matches (191-95). 4-0 on carpet in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Van De Zandschulp has a 21-5 record in the last 6 years on carpet.
The Dutch’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Koblenz Challenger.
Botic has a 15-12 win-loss record in 2020, 4-0 on carpet (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Ismaning Challenger
Van De Zandschulp lost in the 1st round to Luca Vanni.
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Ranked no. 187, Marc-Andrea reached the final after defeating Dustin Brown 7-63 4-6 7-65, Brayden Schnur 7-5 3-6 6-3, Sebastian Korda 6-4 6-4 and Antoine Hoang 6-4 7-64.
In the semifinal, Marc-Andrea had a good straight sets win against Hoang (6-4 7-64). During the match Huesler scored 74 points vs Hoang’s 67. Marc-Andrea was pretty aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about serving, Huesler fired 9 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Marc-Andrea Huesler was exceptionally efficent on serve to win 78% (36/46) of his 1st serve and 61% (17/28) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Huesler broke Hoang twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Huesler has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 51% of the points he played.
The Swiss’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Sibiu Challenger.
Marc-Andrea has a 16-3 win-loss record in 2020, 4-0 on carpet (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Ismaning Challenger
Marc-Andrea lost in the 3rd round to Teimuraz Gabashvili.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Huesler |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 80 | 109 |
| Pts | 281-206 | 342-327 |
| Total Points | 487 | 669 |
| Winners | 126 | 171 |
| %Winners | 45% | 50% |
Both Van De Zandschulp and Huesler played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Botic Van De Zandschulp conceded 1 set, while Marc-Andrea Huesler dropper 2 sets. Van De Zandschulp has played 1 set(s) less than Huesler (9 vs 10). Therefore, Van De Zandschulp played 29 games less than Huesler. Van De Zandschulp scored 126 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The Swiss struck 171 winners (50%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Huesler |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 35 | 48 |
| Avg per match | 8.8 | 12 |
| 1st in | 157/239 | 223/345 |
| %1st in | 66% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 126/157 | 171/223 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 46/82 | 66/122 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 54% |
Van De Zandschulp managed to score 35 aces (8.8 per match). Huesler blasted 48 aces (12 per match). Van De Zandschulp won 80% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Huesler won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Huesler |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 14 | 8 |
| Converted | 14/23 | 8/22 |
| % Converted | 61% | 36% |
| Conceded | 9 | 21 |
| Saved | 6 | 16 |
| % Saved | 67% | 76% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 5 |
The Dutch broke his opponents 14 times with a 61% conversion rate. Botic dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Swiss broke his opponents 8 times with a 36% conversion rate. Huesler conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van De Zandschulp | ||||||
| R1 Pablo Patino-Samudio |
R2 Ramanathan |
1/4 Kamke |
1/2 Gunneswaran |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-1 | 6-2 6-2 | 6-3 3-6 7-69 | 7-66 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 16 | 31 | 20 | 80 | |
| pts | 51-19 | 55-32 | 99-97 | 76-58 | 281-206 | |
| Total points | 70 | 87 | 196 | 134 | 487 | |
| Winners | 21 | 24 | 48 | 33 | 126 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 44% | 48% | 43% | 45% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 8 | 7 | 13 | 7 | 35 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 28/39 | 29/43 | 60/98 | 40/59 | 157/239 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 67% | 61% | 68% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 21/28 | 24/29 | 48/60 | 33/40 | 126/157 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 83% | 80% | 83% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/11 | 9/14 | 16/38 | 13/19 | 46/82 | |
| % 2nd pts | 73% | 64% | 42% | 68% | 56% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 14 | |
| Converted | 5/5 | 4/6 | 3/5 | 2/7 | 14/23 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 67% | 60% | 29% | 61% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 9 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 2/2 | 3/6 | 0/0 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 50% | – | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| Huesler | ||||||
| R1 Brown |
R2 Schnur |
1/4 Korda |
1/2 Hoang |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 4-6 7-65 | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-4 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 36 | 30 | 20 | 23 | 109 | |
| pts | 107-108 | 90-87 | 71-65 | 74-67 | 342-327 | |
| Total points | 215 | 177 | 136 | 141 | 669 | |
| Winners | 51 | 47 | 37 | 36 | 171 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 52% | 52% | 49% | 50% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 15 | 15 | 9 | 9 | 48 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 70/107 | 60/90 | 47/74 | 46/74 | 223/345 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 67% | 64% | 62% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 51/70 | 47/60 | 37/47 | 36/46 | 171/223 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 78% | 79% | 78% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/37 | 15/30 | 12/27 | 17/28 | 66/122 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 50% | 44% | 61% | 54% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Converted | 1/3 | 3/7 | 2/7 | 2/5 | 8/22 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 43% | 29% | 40% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 21 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 3/5 | 9/9 | 3/4 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 60% | 100% | 75% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLLWL
LLWWWLLWWW Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-0) – H2H and prediction
