Martin Klizan and Borna Gojo will play each other in the semifinal of the Istanbul Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 4:00 pm on CENTER COURT. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Borna Gojo who should win in 3 sets.
Borna Gojo -> 1.6
Martin Klizan -> 2.34
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Martin Klizan vs. Borna Gojo
There is no head to head record between Martin Klizan and Borna Gojo since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Martin Klizan
Ranked no. 168, Klizan reached the semifinal after beating Illya Marchenko 7-66 6-3, Roberto Marcora 7-63 6-1 and Mackenzie Mcdonald 4-6 6-4 6-3.
In the quarter against Mcdonald, Martin recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-3).-87) than Mcdonald. In fact, the world no. 168 won 87 points vs Mcdonald’s. That means that Klizan was more focused during the important points. The Slovakian was pretty aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Regarding the service games, Klizan bagged 4 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Martin Klizan lost the serve 4 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Klizan put 59% of his first serves in, winning 71% (42/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 34% (14/41) on the 2nd serve. Martin broke Mcdonald 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Slovakian has dropped 1 set in this competition to win 52% of the points he played.
Klizan has a winning match record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (297-215). 5-3 on hard in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Klizan has a 45-59 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
The Slovakian has a 11-10 win-loss record in 2020, 5-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Istanbul Challenger
Martin didn’t play in the Istanbul Challenger in 2019.
Borna Gojo
Ranked no. 245 (career high), the Croatian got to the semifinal after defeating Cengiz Aksu 7-5 7-5, Andrea Arnaboldi 6-76 6-3 6-2, Taro Daniel 2-6 7-64 7-63, Jay Clarke 6-75 7-5 6-2 and Sebastian Ofner 6-3 1-0 ret..
In the quarter, Borna had a good straight sets win against Ofner (6-3 1-0 ret.). During the match Gojo scored 37 points vs Ofner’s 22. The Croatian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 9 winners.
Talking about serving, Gojo blasted 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Borna Gojo lost the serve once. Furthermore, Gojo put 52% of his first serves in, winning 69% (9/13) of the points behind his 1st serve and 75% (9/12) on the 2nd serve. The Croatian broke Ofner 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Croatian has conceded 3 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
Borna’s best result of the current year was getting to the semi-finals in the Split Challenger.
The Croatian has a 23-12 win-loss record in 2020, 11-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Istanbul Challenger
Gojo didn’t compete in the Istanbul Challenger in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Klizan | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 11 |
| Tot Games | 71 | 121 |
| Pts | 226-210 | 403-370 |
| Total Points | 436 | 773 |
| Winners | 101 | 187 |
| %Winners | 45% | 46% |
Klizan played 3 matches while Gojo competed in 4 matches. Gojo started his run from the qualifications while Klizan had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Martin Klizan conceded 1 set, while Borna Gojo dropper 3 sets. Klizan has played 4 set(s) less than Gojo (7 vs 11). Therefore, Klizan played 50 games less than Gojo. The Slovakian scored 101 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Gojo scored 187 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Klizan | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 37 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 9.3 |
| 1st in | 136/242 | 251/386 |
| %1st in | 56% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 101/136 | 187/251 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 47/106 | 68/135 |
| %2nd pts | 44% | 50% |
Klizan made 12 aces (4 per match). Gojo bagged 37 aces (9.3 per match). Klizan won 74% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Gojo won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Klizan | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 15 |
| Converted | 11/19 | 15/29 |
| % Converted | 58% | 52% |
| Conceded | 23 | 28 |
| Saved | 16 | 19 |
| % Saved | 70% | 68% |
| Times Broken | 7 | 9 |
Martin broke his opponents 11 times with a 58% conversion rate. Martin conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded. Gojo broke his opponents 15 times with a 52% conversion rate. The Croatian conceded his serve 9 times and he saved 68% of the break points that he conceded.
| Klizan | |||||
| R1 Marchenko | R2 Marcora | 1/4 Mcdonald | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 6-3 | 7-63 6-1 | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 20 | 29 | 71 | |
| pts | 73-65 | 66-53 | 87-92 | 226-210 | |
| Total points | 138 | 119 | 179 | 436 | |
| Winners | 28 | 31 | 42 | 101 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 47% | 48% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 7 | 4 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 4 | 7 | 18 | |
| 1st in | 38/73 | 39/69 | 59/100 | 136/242 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 57% | 59% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 28/38 | 31/39 | 42/59 | 101/136 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 79% | 71% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/35 | 13/30 | 14/41 | 47/106 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 43% | 34% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 5 | 11 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 4/8 | 5/9 | 11/19 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 50% | 56% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 10 | 9 | 23 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 8/10 | 5/9 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 80% | 56% | 70% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | |
| Gojo | |||||||
| Q1 Aksu | Q3 Arnaboldi | R1 Daniel | R2 Clarke | 1/4 Ofner | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-5 | 6-76 6-3 6-2 | 2-6 7-64 7-63 | 6-75 7-5 6-2 | 6-3 1-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 14 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 30 | 34 | 33 | 10 | 131 | |
| pts | 78-76 | 97-76 | 114-118 | 114-100 | 37-22 | 440-392 | |
| Total points | 154 | 173 | 232 | 214 | 59 | 832 | |
| Winners | 36 | 46 | 52 | 53 | 9 | 196 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 47% | 46% | 46% | 24% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||||||
| Aces | 4 | 14 | 7 | 12 | 2 | 39 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 21 | |
| 1st in | 43/76 | 56/89 | 77/116 | 75/105 | 13/25 | 264/411 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 63% | 66% | 71% | 52% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 36/43 | 46/56 | 52/77 | 53/75 | 9/13 | 196/264 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 82% | 68% | 71% | 69% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/33 | 21/33 | 16/39 | 17/30 | 9/12 | 77/147 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 64% | 41% | 57% | 75% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 18 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/5 | 4/8 | 5/10 | 3/6 | 18/35 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 60% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 51% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 0 | 14 | 10 | 1 | 29 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 0/0 | 8/14 | 8/10 | 0/1 | 19 | |
| Saved % | 75% | – | 57% | 80% | 0% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 10 | |
Tennis Scores in Istanbul Challenger
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Jason JungJung (7-66 6-2) – See score progression
- Borna GojoGojo – Sebastian OfnerOfner (6-3 1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Ilya IvashkaIvashka – Dmitry PopkoPopko (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Martin KlizanKlizan – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Denys Molchanov/Sergiy StakhovskyMolchanov/Sergiy Stakhovsky – Hunter Reese/Jan ZielinskiReese/Jan Zielinski (6-4 4-6 10-4) – See score progression
- Ivan Sabanov/Matej SabanovSabanov/Matej Sabanov – Sadio Doumbia/Fabien ReboulDoumbia/Fabien Reboul (6-3 2-6 10-7) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Martin KlizanKlizan – Borna GojoGojo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (0-0) – H2H and prediction