Prajnesh Gunneswaran and Daniel Masur will clash against each other in the quarter of the Ismaning Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 3:30 pm on CENTRE. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Masur who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Masur is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Masur -> 1.40
Prajnesh Gunneswaran -> 2.75
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Prajnesh Gunneswaran vs. Daniel Masur
There is no head to head record between Prajnesh Gunneswaran and Daniel Masur since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Prajnesh Gunneswaran
Ranked no. 152, Gunneswaran got to the quarter after defeating Tomas Martin Etcheverry 6-4 3-6 7-63 and Lukas Lacko 6-4 5-7 6-4.
In the 2nd round, The Indian defeated Lacko (6-4 5-7 6-4). During the match Gunneswaran scored 104 points vs Lacko’s 88. Prajnesh was very aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gunneswaran struck 17 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Prajnesh Gunneswaran was exceptionally effective on serve to win 85% (40/47) of his 1st serve and 71% (25/35) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Indian broke Lacko twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Gunneswaran has lost 2 set in this tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Gunneswaran has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 63% of his matches (247-144). 2-0 on carpet in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Gunneswaran has a 7-5 record in the last 9 years on carpet.
The Indian has a 9-11 win-loss record in 2020, 2-0 on carpet (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Ismaning Challenger
The Indian didn’t compete in the Ismaning Challenger in 2019.
Daniel Masur
Ranked no. 256, Daniel got to the quarter after defeating Matthias Bachinger 3-6 6-2 6-3, Jc Aragone 6-1 6-2, Gregoire Barrere 6-3 6-2 and Mats Rosenkranz 6-4 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Masur had a good straight sets win against Rosenkranz (6-4 6-3). During the match Masur scored 60 points vs Rosenkranz’s 46. The German was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Masur managed to score 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Daniel Masur lost the serve once. Furthermore, Masur put 77% of his first serves in, winning 84% (31/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 27% (3/11) on the 2nd serve. Masur was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Rosenkranz 4 times.
Overall Performance in this tournament
The German has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 58% of the points he played.
The German has a 15-11 win-loss record in 2020, 4-1 on carpet (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Ismaning Challenger
The German lost in the quarter to Maxime Cressy.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gunneswaran | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 64 | 77 |
| Pts | 210-188 | 271-195 |
| Total Points | 398 | 466 |
| Winners | 78 | 112 |
| %Winners | 37% | 41% |
Gunneswaran played 2 matches while Masur competed in 4 matches. Masur started his run from the qualifications while Gunneswaran had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Prajnesh Gunneswaran conceded 2 sets, while Daniel Masur dropper 1 set. Gunneswaran has played 3 set(s) less than Masur (6 vs 9). Therefore, Gunneswaran played 13 games less than Masur. Gunneswaran scored 78 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Masur blasted 112 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gunneswaran | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 23 | 26 |
| Avg per match | 11.5 | 6.5 |
| 1st in | 94/167 | 143/203 |
| %1st in | 56% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 78/94 | 112/143 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 50/73 | 36/60 |
| %2nd pts | 68% | 60% |
Gunneswaran recorded 23 aces (11.5 per match). Masur managed to score 26 aces (6.5 per match). Gunneswaran won 83% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, Masur won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gunneswaran | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 17 |
| Converted | 3/23 | 17/36 |
| % Converted | 13% | 47% |
| Conceded | 9 | 4 |
| Saved | 7 | 0 |
| % Saved | 78% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
The Indian broke his opponents 3 times with a 13% conversion rate. Prajnesh dropped his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. Daniel broke his opponents 17 times with a 47% conversion rate. Daniel conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gunneswaran | ||||
| R1 Martin |
R2 Lacko |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 7-63 | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | 64 | |
| pts | 106-100 | 104-88 | 210-188 | |
| Total points | 206 | 192 | 398 | |
| Winners | 38 | 40 | 78 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 38% | 37% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 17 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 47/85 | 47/82 | 94/167 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 57% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 38/47 | 40/47 | 78/94 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 85% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/38 | 25/35 | 50/73 | |
| % 2nd pts | 66% | 71% | 68% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Converted | 1/16 | 2/7 | 3/23 | |
| Converted % | 6% | 29% | 13% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 4/5 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 80% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Masur | ||||||
| Q1 Bachinger |
Q3 Aragone |
R1 Barrere |
R2 Rosenkranz |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | 6-1 6-2 | 6-3 6-2 | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 15 | 17 | 19 | 77 | |
| pts | 92-78 | 59-33 | 60-38 | 60-46 | 271-195 | |
| Total points | 170 | 92 | 98 | 106 | 466 | |
| Winners | 35 | 19 | 27 | 31 | 112 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 32% | 45% | 52% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 5 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 26 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 50/74 | 26/36 | 30/45 | 37/48 | 143/203 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 72% | 67% | 77% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 35/50 | 19/26 | 27/30 | 31/37 | 112/143 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 73% | 90% | 84% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/24 | 9/10 | 10/15 | 3/11 | 36/60 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 90% | 67% | 27% | 60% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 17 | |
| Converted | 5/14 | 5/12 | 3/6 | 4/4 | 17/36 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 42% | 50% | 100% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | |
| Saved | 0/3 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLWWLL Upcoming matches in the draw
- Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran – Daniel MasurMasur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Tobias KamkeKamke (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine HoangHoang – Maximilian MartererMarterer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Sebastian KordaKorda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
