![Prediction And Head To Head Daniel Masur Vs. Mats Rosenkranz Oyjyc3t4oh Prediction and head to head Daniel Masur vs. Mats Rosenkranz](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Daniel-Masur-vs.-Mats-Rosenkranz-OyJYc3t4oh.jpg)
Daniel Masur and Mats Rosenkranz will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Ismaning Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 2:00 pm on CENTRE. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Masur who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Masur is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Masur -> 1.22
Mats Rosenkranz -> 4.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Daniel Masur vs. Mats Rosenkranz
There is no head to head record between Daniel Masur and Mats Rosenkranz since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Daniel Masur
Ranked no. 256, Masur got to the 2nd round after defeating Matthias Bachinger 3-6 6-2 6-3, Jc Aragone 6-1 6-2 and Gregoire Barrere 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Masur had a good straight sets win against Barrere (6-3 6-2). During the match Masur scored 60 points vs Barrere’s 38. The German was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Masur blasted 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Daniel Masur was exceptionally effective on serve to win 90% (27/30) of his 1st serve and 67% (10/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Masur broke Barrere 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Masur has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 58% of his matches (266-192). 3-1 on carpet in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Masur has a 41-22 record in the last 7 years on carpet.
Masur has a 14-11 win-loss record in 2020, 3-1 on carpet (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Ismaning Challenger
Masur lost in the quarter to Maxime Cressy.
Mats Rosenkranz
Ranked no. 642, Mats got to the 2nd round after beating Maxime Cressy 7-5 7-63.
In the 1st round, The German had a good straight sets win against Cressy (7-5 7-63). During the match Rosenkranz scored 81 points vs Cressy’s 75. The German was very aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about serving, Rosenkranz blasted 16 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Mats Rosenkranz was quite effective on serve to win 79% (44/56) of his 1st serve and 52% (12/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The German broke Cressy once after converting 17% of his break points (1/6).
Mats has a 10-13 win-loss record in 2020, 2-1 on carpet (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Ismaning Challenger
Rosenkranz lost in the 1st round to Zdenek Kolar.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Masur | Rosenkranz |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 1 |
Tot Set | 7 | 2 |
Tot Games | 58 | 25 |
Pts | 211-149 | 81-75 |
Total Points | 360 | 156 |
Winners | 81 | 44 |
%Winners | 38% | 54% |
Masur played 3 matches while Rosenkranz competed in 1 match. Masur started his run from the qualifications while Rosenkranz had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Daniel Masur lost 1 set while Mats Rosenkranz hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Masur has played 5 sets more than Rosenkranz (7 vs 2). Therefore, Masur played 33 games more than Rosenkranz. The German scored 81 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Rosenkranz blasted 44 winners (54%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Masur | Rosenkranz |
---|---|---|
Aces | 18 | 16 |
Avg per match | 6 | 16 |
1st in | 106/155 | 56/79 |
%1st in | 68% | 71% |
1st pts | 81/106 | 44/56 |
%1st pts | 76% | 79% |
2nd pts | 33/49 | 12/23 |
%2nd pts | 67% | 52% |
Masur fired 18 aces (6 per match). Rosenkranz fired 16 aces . Masur won 76% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Rosenkranz won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Masur | Rosenkranz |
---|---|---|
Won | 13 | 1 |
Converted | 13/32 | 1/6 |
% Converted | 41% | 17% |
Conceded | 3 | 1 |
Saved | 0 | 1 |
% Saved | 0% | 100% |
Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
The German broke his opponents 13 times with a 41% conversion rate. Daniel conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Rosenkranz broke his opponent once with a 17% conversion rate. The German was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
Masur | |||||
Q1 Bachinger |
Q3 Aragone |
R1 Barrere |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | 6-1 6-2 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 26 | 15 | 17 | 58 | |
pts | 92-78 | 59-33 | 60-38 | 211-149 | |
Total points | 170 | 92 | 98 | 360 | |
Winners | 35 | 19 | 27 | 81 | |
%Winners | 38% | 32% | 45% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 5 | 7 | 6 | 18 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 | |
1st in | 50/74 | 26/36 | 30/45 | 106/155 | |
% 1st in | 68% | 72% | 67% | 68% | |
1st pts | 35/50 | 19/26 | 27/30 | 81/106 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | 73% | 90% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 14/24 | 9/10 | 10/15 | 33/49 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 90% | 67% | 67% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 5 | 5 | 3 | 13 | |
Converted | 5/14 | 5/12 | 3/6 | 13/32 | |
Converted % | 36% | 42% | 50% | 41% | |
Conceded | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
Saved | 0/3 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | – | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Rosenkranz | |||||
R1 Cressy |
Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 7-63 | ||||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |||
Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |||
pts | 81-75 | 81-75 | |||
Total points | 156 | 156 | |||
Winners | 44 | 44 | |||
%Winners | 54% | 54% | |||
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 16 | 16 | |||
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |||
1st in | 56/79 | 56/79 | |||
% 1st in | 71% | 71% | |||
1st pts | 44/56 | 44/56 | |||
% 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |||
2nd pts | 12/23 | 12/23 | |||
% 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |||
Breaks | |||||
Won | 1 | 1 | |||
Converted | 1/6 | 1/6 | |||
Converted % | 17% | 17% | |||
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |||
Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |||
Saved % | 100% | 33% | |||
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Ismaning Challenger
- Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran – Lukas LackoLacko (6-4 5-7 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (7-66 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Antoine HoangHoang – Matteo ViolaViola (6-2 3-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tobias KamkeKamke – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Julian LenzLenz – Sebastian KordaKorda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brayden SchnurSchnur – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine HoangHoang – Maximilian MartererMarterer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Daniel MasurMasur (0-0) – H2H and prediction