Mitchell Krueger and Juan Pablo Ficovich will square off in the 2nd round of the Parma Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 10:00 am on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Juan Pablo Ficovich who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Juan Pablo Ficovich is the pick to win this match.
Juan Pablo Ficovich -> 1.36
Mitchell Krueger -> 3.00
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mitchell Krueger vs. Juan Pablo Ficovich
There is no head to head record between Mitchell Krueger and Juan Pablo Ficovich since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Mitchell Krueger
Ranked no. 187, Krueger got to the 2nd round after defeating Denis Istomin 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Istomin (6-4 6-4). During the match Krueger scored 68 points vs Istomin’s 50. Krueger was quite aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Krueger struck 3 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults. Mitchell Krueger was quite efficent on serve to win 90% (27/30) of his 1st serve and 81% (13/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Mitchell broke Istomin twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Krueger has a favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (303-264). 1-2 on clay in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Krueger has a 96-70 record in the last years on clay.
The American’s best result of the current year was reaching the semi-finals in the Newport Beach Challenger and the Indian Wells Challenger.
Krueger has a 13-10 win-loss record in 2020, 1-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Parma Challenger
The American didn’t play in the Parma Challenger in 2019.
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Ranked no. 206, Pablo Ficovich reached the 2nd round after defeating Matteo Arnaldi 4-6 6-1 6-0 and Danilo Petrovic 6-3 7-65.
In the 1st round, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Petrovic (6-3 7-65). During the match Pablo Ficovich scored 81 points vs Petrovic’s 65. Pablo Ficovich was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Pablo Ficovich recorded 3 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Juan Pablo Ficovich lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Pablo Ficovich put 74% of his first serves in, winning 73% (38/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (9/18) on the 2nd serve. The Argentine broke Petrovic 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Juan’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Morelos Challenger.
Pablo Ficovich has a 13-13 win-loss record in 2020, 9-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Parma Challenger
Juan didn’t compete in the Parma Challenger in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Krueger | Pablo Ficovich |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 65 |
| Pts | 68-50 | 166-122 |
| Total Points | 118 | 288 |
| Winners | 27 | 74 |
| %Winners | 40% | 45% |
Krueger played 1 match while Pablo Ficovich competed in 3 matches. Pablo Ficovich started his run from the qualifications while Krueger had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Juan Pablo Ficovich lost 3 sets while Mitchell Krueger hasn’t dropped a set so far. Krueger has played 5 set(s) less than Pablo Ficovich (2 vs 7). Therefore, Krueger played 45 games less than Pablo Ficovich. The American scored 27 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Pablo Ficovich bagged 74 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Krueger | Pablo Ficovich |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 2.3 |
| 1st in | 30/46 | 98/134 |
| %1st in | 65% | 73% |
| 1st pts | 27/30 | 74/98 |
| %1st pts | 90% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 13/16 | 21/36 |
| %2nd pts | 81% | 58% |
Krueger fired 3 aces . Pablo Ficovich fired 7 aces (2.3 per match). Krueger won 90% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 81% of the points. On the other side, Pablo Ficovich won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Krueger | Pablo Ficovich |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 8 |
| Converted | 2/7 | 8/21 |
| % Converted | 29% | 38% |
| Conceded | 0 | 9 |
| Saved | 0 | 6 |
| % Saved | NAN% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
The American broke his opponent twice with a 29% conversion rate. The American pretty effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. Juan broke his opponents 8 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Argentine conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Krueger | |||
| R1 Istomin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 68-50 | 68-50 | |
| Total points | 118 | 118 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 30/46 | 30/46 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 27/30 | 27/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 90% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/16 | 13/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 81% | 81% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 2/7 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Pablo Ficovich | |||||
| Q1 Arnaldi |
Q3 Machac |
R1 Petrovic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-1 6-0 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-3 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 20 | 22 | 65 | |
| pts | 85-57 | – | 81-65 | 166-122 | |
| Total points | 142 | 0 | 146 | 288 | |
| Winners | 36 | 38 | 74 | ||
| %Winners | 42% | NAN% | 47% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 0 | 3 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 1st in | 46/64 | / | 52/70 | 98/134 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | NAN% | 74% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 36/46 | / | 38/52 | 74/98 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | NAN% | 73% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/18 | / | 9/18 | 21/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | NAN% | 50% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 8 | ||
| Converted | 5/13 | / | 3/8 | 8/21 | |
| Converted % | 38% | NAN% | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 6 | 9 | ||
| Saved | 2/3 | 0/ | 4/6 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | – | 67% | 134% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
Head 2 Head
WWLWWLWLLW
LLWLWWLLLW Tennis Scores in Parma Challenger
- Laslo DjereDjere – Sumit NagalNagal (7-5 4-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (6-3 3-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Filippo BaldiBaldi – Gianluca MagerMager (4-6 6-3 3-1 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Tomas MachacMachac (6-2 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Federico DelbonisDelbonis – Paolo LorenziLorenzi (5-3) – H2H and prediction
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Laslo DjereDjere (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Philipp KohlschreiberKohlschreiber (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Filippo BaldiBaldi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
