Botic Van De Zandschulp and Borna Gojo will play each other in the 2nd round of the Split Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 4:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.77
Borna Gojo -> 2.01
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Borna Gojo
There is no head to head record between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Borna Gojo since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Ranked no. 166, the Dutch reached the 2nd round after defeating Pedja Krstin 6-1 6-1.
In the 1st round, Van De Zandschulp had a good straight sets win against Krstin (6-1 6-1). During the match Van De Zandschulp scored 60 points vs Krstin’s 31. Botic was extremely aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about the service games, Van De Zandschulp blasted 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Botic Van De Zandschulp was extremely efficent on serve to win 85% (22/26) of his 1st serve and 64% (7/11) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Botic broke Krstin 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Van De Zandschulp has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 67% of his matches (187-93). 6-4 on clay in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Van De Zandschulp has a 105-57 win-loss record in the last 6 years on clay.
The Dutch’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Koblenz Challenger.
Botic has a 11-10 win-loss record in 2020, 6-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Split Challenger
Van De Zandschulp didn’t play in the Split Challenger in 2019.
Borna Gojo
Ranked no. 270, Gojo reached the 2nd round after beating Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera 4-6 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round against Tomas Barrios Vera, Borna recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-4). During the match Gojo scored 88 points vs Tomas Barrios Vera’s 83. The Croatian was pretty aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about serving, Gojo bagged 11 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Borna Gojo lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Gojo put 56% of his first serves in, winning 76% (39/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (20/40) on the 2nd serve. Borna broke Tomas Barrios Vera 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Gojo has a 13-10 win-loss record in 2020, 5-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Split Challenger
The Croatian didn’t compete in the Split Challenger in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 14 | 29 |
| Pts | 60-31 | 88-83 |
| Total Points | 91 | 171 |
| Winners | 22 | 39 |
| %Winners | 37% | 44% |
Both Van De Zandschulp and Gojo played 1 match. At the moment, Borna Gojo lost 1 set while Botic Van De Zandschulp hasn’t conceded a set so far. Van De Zandschulp has played 1 set(s) less than Gojo (2 vs 3). Therefore, Van De Zandschulp played 15 games less than Gojo. Botic scored 22 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Gojo struck 39 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 11 |
| 1st in | 26/37 | 51/91 |
| %1st in | 70% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 22/26 | 39/51 |
| %1st pts | 85% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 20/40 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 50% |
Van De Zandschulp bagged 6 aces . Gojo blasted 11 aces . Van De Zandschulp won 85% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Gojo won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/10 | 3/4 |
| % Converted | 50% | 75% |
| Conceded | 2 | 3 |
| Saved | 2 | 1 |
| % Saved | 100% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The Dutch broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Botic had a solid display on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 2 break points. Borna broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. The Croatian conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| R1 Krstin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 60-31 | 60-31 | |
| Total points | 91 | 91 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 26/37 | 26/37 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 22/26 | 22/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 7/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Gojo | |||
| R1 Tomas Barrios Vera |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 88-83 | 88-83 | |
| Total points | 171 | 171 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 51/91 | 51/91 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 39/51 | 39/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/40 | 20/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLLWLWWW
LL Tennis Scores in Split Challenger
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Carlos TabernerTaberner (3-6 7-5 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Viktor TroickiTroicki (6-1 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Pedro SousaSousa – Zdenek KolarKolar (6-1 3-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Pedro SousaSousa – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Martin KlizanKlizan – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bradley KlahnKlahn – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Jozef KovalikKovalik (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Maximilian MartererMarterer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
