Rebecca Sramkova and Richel Hogenkamp will face off in the qualifications of the French Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 10 am on Court 12. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Rebecca Sramkova who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Rebecca Sramkova is the pick to win this match.
Rebecca Sramkova -> 1.86
Richel Hogenkamp -> 1.94
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Rebecca Sramkova vs. Richel Hogenkamp
There is no head to head record between Rebecca Sramkova and Richel Hogenkamp since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Rebecca Sramkova
Ranked no. 203, Sramkova reached the qualifications after beating Cristina Bucsa 4-6 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications against Bucsa, Sramkova recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-4). During the match Sramkova scored 98 points vs Bucsa’s 82. The Slovakian was pretty aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sramkova struck 5 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Rebecca Sramkova was quite efficent on serve to win 80% (51/64) of her 1st serve and 52% (14/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. Sramkova broke Bucsa twice after converting 29% of her break points (2/7).
Sramkova has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 61% of her matches (219-139). 3-3 on clay in 2020. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Sramkova has a 137-73 win-loss record in the last 6 years on clay.
Rebecca’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the W25 Rancho Santa Fe.
Sramkova has a 10-8 win-loss record in 2020, 3-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year at the French Open
Rebecca surrendered in the qualifications to Jasmine Paolini.
Richel Hogenkamp
Ranked no. 221, Hogenkamp got to the qualifications after beating Kristina Kucova 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Richel had a good straight sets win against Kucova (6-1 6-3). During the match Hogenkamp scored 66 points vs Kucova’s 46. Hogenkamp was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Hogenkamp was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 2 double faults. Richel Hogenkamp lost the serve twice and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Hogenkamp put 57% of her first serves in, winning 68% (21/31) of the points behind her 1st serve and 52% (12/23) on the 2nd serve. Hogenkamp broke Kucova 6 times after converting 46% of her break points (6/13).
The Dutch has a 6-8 win-loss record in 2020, 2-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year at the French Open
Richel lost in the qualifications to Nao Hibino.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sramkova | Hogenkamp |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 16 |
| Pts | 98-82 | 66-46 |
| Total Points | 180 | 112 |
| Winners | 51 | 21 |
| %Winners | 52% | 32% |
Both Sramkova and Hogenkamp played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Rebecca Sramkova lost 1 set while Richel Hogenkamp hasn’t lost a set so far. Sramkova has played 1 set more than Hogenkamp (3 vs 2). Therefore, Sramkova played 13 games more than Hogenkamp. Sramkova scored 51 winners (52% of the total points). On the other side, Hogenkamp struck 21 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sramkova | Hogenkamp |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 0 |
| 1st in | 64/91 | 31/54 |
| %1st in | 70% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 51/64 | 21/31 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 14/27 | 12/23 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 52% |
Sramkova blasted 5 aces . Hogenkamp didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Sramkova won 80% points on her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Hogenkamp won 68% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sramkova | Hogenkamp |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 6 |
| Converted | 2/7 | 6/13 |
| % Converted | 29% | 46% |
| Conceded | 3 | 7 |
| Saved | 2 | 5 |
| % Saved | 67% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Sramkova broke her opponent twice with a 29% conversion rate. Rebecca conceded her serve once and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. The Dutch broke her opponent 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. Richel conceded her serve twice and she saved 71% of the break points that she conceded.
| Sramkova | |||
| Q1 Bucsa |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 98-82 | 98-82 | |
| Total points | 180 | 180 | |
| Winners | 51 | 51 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 52% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 64/91 | 64/91 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 51/64 | 51/64 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/27 | 14/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 2/7 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Hogenkamp | |||
| Q1 Kucova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 66-46 | 66-46 | |
| Total points | 112 | 112 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 31/54 | 31/54 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 21/31 | 21/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/23 | 12/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/13 | 6/13 | |
| Converted % | 46% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLWWW
Tennis Scores at the French Open
- Caty McNallyMcNally – Pemra OzgenOzgen (5-7 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Arina RodionovaRodionova – Samantha MurrayMurray (6-3 7-61) – See score progression
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – Reka-Luca JaniJani (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Astra SharmaSharma – Irina RamialisonRamialison (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Asia MuhammadMuhammad – Audrey AlbieAlbie (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Clara TausonTauson – Gabriela TalabaTalaba (7-64 1-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Victoria KanKan (7-5 6-0) – See score progression
- Ivana JorovicJorovic – Lara ArruabarrenaArruabarrena (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Yuki NaitoNaito – Amandine HesseHesse (5-7 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Leonie KungKung – Dalila JakupovicJakupovic (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniela SeguelSeguel – Antonia LottnerLottner (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Julia GrabherGrabher – Allie KiickKiick (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Irina Maria BaraMaria Bara – Tereza MrdezaMrdeza (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Xin Yu WangYu Wang – Robin AndersonAnderson (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Jaqueline CristianCristian – Jana CepelovaCepelova (6-2 7-64) – See score progression
- Laura-Ioana PaarPaar – Margot YerolymosYerolymos (1-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Vera ZvonarevaZvonareva – Natalia VikhlyantsevaVikhlyantseva (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Richel HogenkampHogenkamp – Kristina KucovaKucova (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Valeria SavinykhSavinykh (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Rebecca SramkovaSramkova – Cristina BucsaBucsa (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Francesca Di LorenzoDi Lorenzo – Marina MelnikovaMelnikova (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Dalma GalfiGalfi – Jana FettFett (6-0 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Harriet DartDart – Mihaela BuzarnescuBuzarnescu (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Tessah AndrianjafitrimoAndrianjafitrimo – Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz (3-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Sara ErraniErrani – Ekaterine GorgodzeGorgodze (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Marta KostyukKostyuk – Isabella ShinikovaShinikova (6-1 3-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Ann LiLi – Indy De VroomeDe Vroome (7-66 6-4) – See score progression
- Carole MonnetMonnet – Whitney OsuigweOsuigwe (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto – Anastasiya KomardinaKomardina (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Elitsa KostovaKostova – Gabriela CeCe (7-5 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Mayo HibiHibi – Caroline DolehideDolehide (3-6 7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Natalija KosticKostic – Bibiane SchoofsSchoofs (6-2 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Renata ZarazuaZarazua – Olga DanilovicDanilovic (3-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Kurumi NaraNara – Aubane DroguetDroguet (7-63 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Monica NiculescuNiculescu – Chihiro MuramatsuMuramatsu (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Magdalena FrechFrech (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Eva Guerrero AlvarezGuerrero Alvarez – Jessika PonchetPonchet (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Martina Di GiuseppeDi Giuseppe – Usue Maitane ArconadaMaitane Arconada (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova – Mariam BolkvadzeBolkvadze (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Lesley KerkhoveKerkhove – Yanina WickmayerWickmayer (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Giulia Gatto-MonticoneGatto-Monticone – Selena JanicijevicJanicijevic (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Cagla BuyukakcayBuyukakcay – Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko (6-2 5-7 6-1) – See score progression
- Ankita RainaRaina – Jovana JovicJovic (6-4 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Barbara HaasHaas – Daria SnigurSnigur (6-0 5-7 7-5) – See score progression
- Martina TrevisanTrevisan – Sachia VickeryVickery (4-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Ann LiLi – Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Natalija KosticKostic – Cagla BuyukakcayBuyukakcay (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marta KostyukKostyuk – Laura-Ioana AndreiAndrei (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ankita RainaRaina – Kurumi NaraNara (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Caty McNallyMcNally – Mayar SherifSherif (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giulia Gatto-MonticoneGatto-Monticone – Carole MonnetMonnet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Lesley KerkhoveKerkhove (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eva Guerrero AlvarezGuerrero Alvarez – Sara ErraniErrani (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – Irina Maria BaraMaria Bara (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca SramkovaSramkova – Richel HogenkampHogenkamp (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto – Clara TausonTauson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivana JorovicJorovic – Mayo HibiHibi (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalma GalfiGalfi – Martina Di GiuseppeDi Giuseppe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Jaqueline CristianCristian (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tessah AndrianjafitrimoAndrianjafitrimo – Xin Yu WangYu Wang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Astra SharmaSharma – Yuki NaitoNaito (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Asia MuhammadMuhammad – Martina TrevisanTrevisan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesca Di LorenzoDi Lorenzo – Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Julia GrabherGrabher – Barbara HaasHaas (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Vera ZvonarevaZvonareva – Arina RodionovaRodionova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elitsa KostovaKostova – Monica NiculescuNiculescu (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – Renata ZarazuaZarazua (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniela SeguelSeguel – Leonie KungKung (1-0) – H2H and prediction
