![Prediction And Head To Head Marc Polmans Vs. Liam Broady V3ubnyk5kc Prediction and head to head Marc Polmans vs. Liam Broady](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Marc-Polmans-vs.-Liam-Broady-v3ubnyK5Kc.jpg)
Marc Polmans and Liam Broady will fight against each other in the qualifications of the French Open for the 5th time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1 pm on Court 3. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marc Polmans who should win in 5 sets.
As per the initial odds, Marc Polmans is the pick to win this match.
Marc Polmans -> 1.56
Liam Broady -> 2.43
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Marc Polmans vs. Liam Broady
This will be the 5th time that Marc Polmans and Liam Broady play each other. The head to head is 3-1 for Broady (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Broady won 6-2 6-4 in the 1st round in the Granby Challenger back in 2017.
Marc Polmans
Ranked no. 122, Marc got to the 1st round after defeating Tobias Kamke 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Kamke (6-2 6-2). During the match Polmans scored 64 points vs Kamke’s 44. Polmans was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Polmans recorded 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Marc Polmans was extremely efficent on serve to win 74% (26/35) of his 1st serve and 61% (11/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Australian broke Kamke 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Polmans has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 58% of his matches (243-173). 3-2 on clay in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Polmans has a 68-46 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
Polmans has a 7-9 win-loss record in 2020, 3-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year at the French Open
Polmans lost in the qualifications to Gianluigi Quinzi.
Liam Broady
Ranked no. 206, Liam got to the 1st round after defeating Nicola Kuhn 6-4 7-64.
In the qualifications, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Kuhn (6-4 7-64). During the match Broady scored 77 points vs Kuhn’s 65. Broady was very aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Broady managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Liam Broady was pretty efficent on serve to win 71% (34/48) of his 1st serve and 56% (9/16) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Brit broke Kuhn 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Broady’s best result of the current season was getting to the semi-finals in the Calgary Challenger.
The Brit has a 10-8 win-loss record in 2020, 4-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year at the French Open
Liam didn’t compete at the French Open in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Polmans | Broady |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 16 | 23 |
Pts | 64-44 | 77-65 |
Total Points | 108 | 142 |
Winners | 26 | 34 |
%Winners | 41% | 44% |
Both Polmans and Broady played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Polmans and Broady have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Polmans played 7 games less than Broady. Marc scored 26 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Broady blasted 34 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Polmans | Broady |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 3 |
Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
1st in | 35/53 | 48/64 |
%1st in | 66% | 75% |
1st pts | 26/35 | 34/48 |
%1st pts | 74% | 71% |
2nd pts | 11/18 | 9/16 |
%2nd pts | 61% | 56% |
Polmans made 3 aces . Broady blasted 3 aces . Polmans won 74% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Broady won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Polmans | Broady |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 3 |
Converted | 4/8 | 3/7 |
% Converted | 50% | 43% |
Conceded | 4 | 3 |
Saved | 4 | 1 |
% Saved | 100% | 33% |
Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Marc broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Australian very solid his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 4 break points. Liam broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Broady conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
Polmans | |||
Q1 Kamke |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 64-44 | 64-44 | |
Total points | 108 | 108 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | |
%Winners | 41% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 35/53 | 35/53 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 26/35 | 26/35 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 11/18 | 11/18 | |
% 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Broady | |||
Q1 Kuhn |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 7-64 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
pts | 77-65 | 77-65 | |
Total points | 142 | 142 | |
Winners | 34 | 34 | |
%Winners | 44% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 48/64 | 48/64 | |
% 1st in | 75% | 75% | |
1st pts | 34/48 | 34/48 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 9/16 | 9/16 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores at the French Open
- Ruben BemelmansBemelmans – Kyrian JacquetJacquet (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Robin HaaseHaase (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Martin KlizanKlizan (2-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Dustin BrownBrown – Alexandre MullerMuller (3-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Emilio GomezGomez – Filip HoranskyHoransky (6-4 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (7-68 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Hugo GrenierGrenier (3-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Dustin BrownBrown – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Leonardo MayerMayer – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jason JungJung – Aleksandar VukicVukic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ruben BemelmansBemelmans – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio GomezGomez – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey KuznetsovKuznetsov – Jack SockSock (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto MarcoraMarcora – Benjamin BonziBonzi (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Sebastian KordaKorda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Steven DiezDiez (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Liam BroadyBroady (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Renzo OlivoOlivo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Ulises BlanchBlanch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (0-0) – H2H and prediction