Tomas Martin Etcheverry and Dragos Nicolae Madaras will play each other in the qualifications of the Iasi Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 11 am on Court 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tomas Martin Etcheverry who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tomas Martin Etcheverry is the pick to win this match.
Tomas Martin Etcheverry -> 1.123
Dragos Nicolae Madaras -> 5.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs. Dragos Nicolae Madaras
There is no head to head record between Tomas Martin Etcheverry and Dragos Nicolae Madaras since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Ranked no. 290 (career high), Martin Etcheverry got to the qualifications after beating Mathieu Perchicot 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Tomas had a good straight sets win against Perchicot (6-4 6-4). During the match Martin Etcheverry scored 58 points vs Perchicot’s 47. Martin Etcheverry was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Martin Etcheverry scored just 1 ace throughout the match and he committed only 1 double fault. Tomas Martin Etcheverry lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Martin Etcheverry put 75% of his first serves in, winning 68% (26/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (8/13) on the 2nd serve. Tomas broke Perchicot 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Martin Etcheverry has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 66% of his matches (144-75). 16-8 on clay in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Martin Etcheverry has a 124-62 record in the last 5 years on clay.
Tomas’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Cordoba.
The Argentine has a 16-9 win-loss record in 2020, 16-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Iasi Challenger
Martin Etcheverry didn’t play in the Iasi Challenger in 2019.
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Ranked no. 772, the Romanian reached the qualifications after defeating Hunter Reese 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Romanian had a good straight sets win against Reese (6-2 6-1). During the match Nicolae Madaras scored 59 points vs Reese’s 33. Dragos was extremely aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about serving, Nicolae Madaras scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 5 double faults. Dragos Nicolae Madaras lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Nicolae Madaras put 63% of his first serves in, winning 67% (20/30) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (10/18) on the 2nd serve. The Romanian broke Reese 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).
Dragos’s best result of the year was reaching the semi-finals in M15 Antalya.
The Romanian has a 9-5 win-loss record in 2020, 9-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Iasi Challenger
Nicolae Madaras didn’t compete in the Iasi Challenger in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Martin Etcheverry | Nicolae Madaras |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 15 |
| Pts | 58-47 | 59-33 |
| Total Points | 105 | 92 |
| Winners | 26 | 20 |
| %Winners | 45% | 34% |
Both Martin Etcheverry and Nicolae Madaras played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Martin Etcheverry and Nicolae Madaras have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Martin Etcheverry played 5 games more than Nicolae Madaras. Martin Etcheverry scored 26 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The Romanian blasted 20 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Martin Etcheverry | Nicolae Madaras |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 1 |
| 1st in | 38/51 | 30/48 |
| %1st in | 75% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 26/38 | 20/30 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 8/13 | 10/18 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 56% |
Martin Etcheverry fired 1 ace . Nicolae Madaras also made 1 ace . Martin Etcheverry won 68% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Nicolae Madaras won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Martin Etcheverry | Nicolae Madaras |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 6 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 6/8 |
| % Converted | 57% | 75% |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 |
| Saved | 2 | 2 |
| % Saved | 50% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The Argentine broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Tomas conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Dragos broke his opponent 6 times with a 75% conversion rate. Nicolae Madaras conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Martin Etcheverry | |||
| Q1 Perchicot |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 58-47 | 58-47 | |
| Total points | 105 | 105 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 38/51 | 38/51 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 26/38 | 26/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/13 | 8/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Nicolae Madaras | |||
| Q1 Reese |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 59-33 | 59-33 | |
| Total points | 92 | 92 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 30/48 | 30/48 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 20/30 | 20/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 10/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 6/8 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLLWLWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pablo AndujarAndujar – Alexandre MullerMuller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Peter PolanskyPolansky – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur De GreefDe Greef – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Malek JaziriJaziri (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Adrian Menendez-MaceirasMenendez-Maceiras (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Joao MenezesMenezes – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Nicola KuhnKuhn (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Matteo MartineauMartineau (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Marius CopilCopil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Dragos Nicolae MadarasNicolae Madaras (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cezar CretuCretu – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandar LazarovLazarov – Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Maxime HamouHamou (0-0) – H2H and prediction
