Irina-Camelia Begu and Anna-Lena Friedsam will face off in the qualifications of the Internazionali BNL d’Italia for the 3rd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 10 am on Court 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Irina-Camelia Begu who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Irina-Camelia Begu is the pick to win this match.
Irina-Camelia Begu -> 1.57
Anna-Lena Friedsam -> 2.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Irina-Camelia Begu vs. Anna-Lena Friedsam
This will be the 3rd time that Irina-Camelia Begu and Anna-Lena Friedsam face off. The head to head is 2-0 for Friedsam (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Friedsam won 7-5 3-2 ret. in the 2nd round in Shenzhen back in 2016.
Irina-Camelia Begu
Ranked no. 73, Begu reached the 2nd round after defeating Sara Errani 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Irina-Camelia had a good straight sets win against Errani (6-1 6-3). During the match Begu scored 61 points vs Errani’s 38. Begu was very aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Regarding the service games, Begu made 5 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Irina-Camelia Begu lost the serve twice and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Begu put 50% of her first serves in, winning 71% (20/28) of the points behind her 1st serve and 46% (13/28) on the 2nd serve. Irina-Camelia broke Errani 6 times after converting 75% of her break points (6/8).
Begu has a positive win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 57% of her matches (281-212). 4-2 on clay in 2020. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Begu has a 151-71 record in the last years on clay.
Irina-Camelia has a 19-7 win-loss record in 2020, 4-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Rome
The Romanian lost in the 1st round to Daria Kasatkina.
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Ranked no. 109, Anna-Lena reached the 2nd round after defeating Martina Di Giuseppe 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, The German had a good straight sets win against Di Giuseppe (6-3 6-2). During the match Friedsam scored 67 points vs Di Giuseppe’s 48. Anna-Lena was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Friedsam recorded 4 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Anna-Lena Friedsam lost the serve once and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Friedsam put 60% of her first serves in, winning 86% (30/35) of the points behind her 1st serve and 39% (9/23) on the 2nd serve. The German broke Di Giuseppe 4 times after converting 44% of her break points (4/9).
Friedsam’s best result of the season was reaching the final in Lyon.
Anna-Lena has a 11-8 win-loss record in 2020, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Rome
Friedsam didn’t compete in Rome in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Begu | Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 17 |
| Pts | 61-38 | 67-48 |
| Total Points | 99 | 115 |
| Winners | 20 | 30 |
| %Winners | 33% | 45% |
Both Begu and Friedsam played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Begu and Friedsam have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Begu played 1 game less than Friedsam. Begu scored 20 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, The German struck 30 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Begu | Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 4 |
| 1st in | 28/56 | 35/58 |
| %1st in | 50% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 20/28 | 30/35 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 86% |
| 2nd pts | 13/28 | 9/23 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 39% |
Begu bagged 5 aces . Friedsam fired 4 aces . Begu won 71% points on her first serve. She pretty effective on her second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Friedsam won 86% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 39% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Begu | Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/8 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 75% | 44% |
| Conceded | 5 | 4 |
| Saved | 3 | 3 |
| % Saved | 60% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
The Romanian broke her opponent 6 times with a 75% conversion rate. The Romanian lost her serve twice and she saved 60% of the break points that she conceded. Friedsam broke her opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. The German conceded her serve once and she saved 75% of the break points that she conceded.
| Begu | |||
| Q1 Errani |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 61-38 | 61-38 | |
| Total points | 99 | 99 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 28/56 | 28/56 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 50% | |
| 1st pts | 20/28 | 20/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/28 | 13/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 6/8 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Friedsam | |||
| Q1 Di Giuseppe |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 67-48 | 67-48 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 35/58 | 35/58 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 30/35 | 30/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/23 | 9/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 39% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWWLWWW
LLLLWWLLWL Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernarda PeraPera – Misaki DoiDoi (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BlinkovaBlinkova – Stefanie VoegeleVoegele (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaja JuvanJuvan – Melania DelaiDelai (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arantxa RusRus – Timea BabosBabos (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya – Aliona BolsovaBolsova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Darya KasatkinaKasatkina – Gabriela DabrowskiDabrowski (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Irina-Camelia BeguBegu – Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Katarzyna KawaKawa – Danka KovinicKovinic (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasija SevastovaSevastova – Jasmine PaoliniPaolini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camila GiorgiGiorgi – Dayana YastremskaYastremska (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova – Donna VekicVekic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elena RybakinaRybakina – Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Marie BouzkovaBouzkova – Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva – Rebecca PetersonPeterson (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Victoria AzarenkaAzarenka – Venus WilliamsWilliams (2-6) – H2H and prediction
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Angelique KerberKerber (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Garbine MuguruzaMuguruza – Sloane StephensStephens (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Ons JabeurJabeur – Cori GauffGauff (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anett KontaveitKontaveit – Caroline GarciaGarcia (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia PavlyuchenkovaPavlyuchenkova – Shuai ZhangZhang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magda LinetteLinette – Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Su-Wei HsiehHsieh – Elise MertensMertens (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Barbora StrycovaStrycova – Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
