![Prediction And Head To Head Patricia Maria Tig Vs. Tereza Martincova Vrch7ywdex Prediction and head to head Patricia Maria Tig vs. Tereza Martincova](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Patricia-Maria-Tig-vs.-Tereza-Martincova-VRCh7YwdeX.jpg)
Patricia Maria Tig and Tereza Martincova will face off in the semifinal of the TEB BNP Paribas Istanbul Cup for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 6 pm on Center Court. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Patricia Maria Tig who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Patricia Maria Tig is the pick to win this match.
Patricia Maria Tig -> 1.66
Tereza Martincova -> 2.20
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Patricia Maria Tig vs. Tereza Martincova
There is no head to head record between Patricia Maria Tig and Tereza Martincova since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Patricia Maria Tig
Ranked no. 88, the Romanian reached the semifinal after beating Olga Danilovic 6-3 7-5, Misaki Doi 6-2 6-0 and Rebecca Peterson 6-3 6-1.
In the quarter, Maria Tig had a good straight sets win against Peterson (6-3 6-1). During the match Maria Tig scored 62 points vs Peterson’s 44. Patricia was exceptionally aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Maria Tig scored just 1 ace during the match and she was very solid in conceding no double faults. Patricia Maria Tig lost the serve twice and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Maria Tig put 68% of her first serves in, winning 59% (24/41) of the points behind her 1st serve and 53% (10/19) on the 2nd serve. Patricia broke Peterson 6 times after converting 75% of her break points (6/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Maria Tig hasn’t conceded yet a set in this competition to win 58% of the points she played.
Maria Tig has a winning record in the last 5 years having won 56% of her matches (129-102). 3-2 on clay in 2020. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this competition, Maria Tig has a 39-33 record in the last 5 years on clay.
Patricia’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the W25 Canberra and the W25 Nonthaburi.
The Romanian has a 15-7 win-loss record in 2020, 3-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Istanbul
The Romanian didn’t play in Istanbul in 2019.
Tereza Martincova
Ranked no. 136, Tereza got to the semifinal after defeating Zeynep Sonmez 4-1 ret., Elisabetta Cocciaretto 5-7 7-5 6-3, Greetje Minnen 7-65 6-3, Caroline Garcia 6-1 6-4 and Aliaksandra Sasnovich 6-2 6-3.
In the quarter, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Sasnovich (6-2 6-3). During the match Martincova scored 65 points vs Sasnovich’s 49. Martincova was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Martincova scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she was quite solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Tereza Martincova lost the serve 4 times and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Martincova put 75% of her first serves in, winning 59% (29/49) of the points behind her 1st serve and 31% (5/16) on the 2nd serve. The Czech broke Sasnovich 7 times after converting 64% of her break points (7/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Czech has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points she played.
The Czech has a 15-8 win-loss record in 2020, 7-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Istanbul
Tereza didn’t compete in Istanbul in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Maria Tig | Martincova |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 4 |
Tot Set | 6 | 9 |
Tot Games | 51 | 89 |
Pts | 200-142 | 321-266 |
Total Points | 342 | 587 |
Winners | 73 | 143 |
%Winners | 37% | 45% |
Maria Tig played 3 matches while Martincova competed in 4 matches. Martincova started her run from the qualifications while Maria Tig had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Tereza Martincova dropped 1 set while Patricia Maria Tig hasn’t conceded a set so far. Maria Tig has played 3 set(s) less than Martincova (6 vs 9). Therefore, Maria Tig played 38 games less than Martincova. The Romanian scored 73 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Martincova managed to score 143 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Maria Tig | Martincova |
---|---|---|
Aces | 4 | 5 |
Avg per match | 1.3 | 1.3 |
1st in | 113/169 | 221/303 |
%1st in | 67% | 73% |
1st pts | 73/113 | 143/221 |
%1st pts | 65% | 65% |
2nd pts | 21/56 | 37/82 |
%2nd pts | 38% | 45% |
Maria Tig made 4 aces (1.3 per match). Martincova bagged 5 aces (1.3 per match). Maria Tig won 65% points behind her first serve. She quite strong on her second serve to win 38% of the points. On the other side, Martincova won 65% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Maria Tig | Martincova |
---|---|---|
Won | 21 | 22 |
Converted | 21/31 | 22/43 |
% Converted | 68% | 51% |
Conceded | 25 | 32 |
Saved | 16 | 19 |
% Saved | 64% | 59% |
Times Broken | 9 | 13 |
Patricia broke her opponents 21 times with a 68% conversion rate. Maria Tig surrendered her serve 9 times and she saved 64% of the break points that she conceded. Tereza broke her opponents 22 times with a 51% conversion rate. Martincova conceded her serve 13 times and she saved 59% of the break points that she conceded.
Maria Tig | |||||
R1 Danilovic |
R2 Doi |
1/4 Peterson |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 7-5 | 6-2 6-0 | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 14 | 16 | 51 | |
pts | 80-72 | 58-26 | 62-44 | 200-142 | |
Total points | 152 | 84 | 106 | 342 | |
Winners | 28 | 21 | 24 | 73 | |
%Winners | 35% | 36% | 39% | 37% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 10 | 1 | 0 | 11 | |
1st in | 48/74 | 24/35 | 41/60 | 113/169 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 69% | 68% | 67% | |
1st pts | 28/48 | 21/24 | 24/41 | 73/113 | |
% 1st pts | 58% | 88% | 59% | 65% | |
2nd pts | 5/26 | 6/11 | 10/19 | 21/56 | |
% 2nd pts | 19% | 55% | 53% | 38% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 9 | 6 | 6 | 21 | |
Converted | 9/12 | 6/11 | 6/8 | 21/31 | |
Converted % | 75% | 55% | 75% | 68% | |
Conceded | 16 | 1 | 8 | 25 | |
Saved | 10/16 | 0/1 | 6/8 | 16 | |
Saved % | 63% | 0% | 75% | 46% | |
Times Broken | 6 | 1 | 2 | 9 |
Martincova | |||||||
Q1 Sonmez |
Q3 Cocciaretto |
R1 Minnen |
R2 Garcia |
1/4 Sasnovich |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-1 ret. | 5-7 7-5 6-3 | 7-65 6-3 | 6-1 6-4 | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | |
Tot Games | 5 | 33 | 22 | 17 | 17 | 94 | |
pts | 21-14 | 113-104 | 84-74 | 59-39 | 65-49 | 342-280 | |
Total points | 35 | 217 | 158 | 98 | 114 | 622 | |
Winners | 7 | 54 | 35 | 25 | 29 | 150 | |
%Winners | 33% | 48% | 42% | 42% | 45% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||||||
Aces | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 10 | |
1st in | 10/17 | 87/121 | 46/67 | 39/50 | 49/65 | 231/320 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 72% | 69% | 78% | 75% | 72% | |
1st pts | 7/10 | 54/87 | 35/46 | 25/39 | 29/49 | 150/231 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | 62% | 76% | 64% | 59% | 65% | |
2nd pts | 3/7 | 15/34 | 9/21 | 8/11 | 5/16 | 40/89 | |
% 2nd pts | 43% | 44% | 43% | 73% | 31% | 45% | |
Breaks | |||||||
Won | 2 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 24 | |
Converted | 2/5 | 6/12 | 4/13 | 5/7 | 7/11 | 24/48 | |
Converted % | 40% | 50% | 31% | 71% | 64% | 50% | |
Conceded | 1 | 13 | 7 | 2 | 10 | 33 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 8/13 | 5/7 | 0/2 | 6/10 | 19 | |
Saved % | 0% | 62% | 71% | 0% | 60% | 64% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 14 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Istanbul
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Patricia Maria TigMaria Tig – Rebecca PetersonPeterson (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert – Polona HercogHercog (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Eugenie BouchardBouchard – Danka KovinicKovinic (3-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Alexa Guarachi/Desirae KrawczykGuarachi/Desirae Krawczyk – Elixane Lechemia/Ingrid NeelLechemia/Ingrid Neel (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Eugenie BouchardBouchard – Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Patricia Maria TigMaria Tig (0-0) – H2H and prediction