Miomir Kecmanovic and Marc-Andrea Huesler will play each other in the semifinal of the Generali Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 3 pm on Center Court. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Miomir Kecmanovic who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Miomir Kecmanovic is the pick to win this match.
Miomir Kecmanovic -> 1.42
Marc-Andrea Huesler -> 3.06
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Miomir Kecmanovic vs. Marc-Andrea Huesler
There is no head to head record between Miomir Kecmanovic and Marc-Andrea Huesler since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Miomir Kecmanovic
Ranked no. 47 (career high), the Serbian got to the semifinal after defeating Kei Nishikori 4-6 6-4 6-2, Jordan Thompson 6-2 6-2 and Federico Delbonis 6-4 6-75 7-5.
In the quarter, Kecmanovic defeated Delbonis (6-4 6-75 7-5). During the match Kecmanovic scored 114 points vs Delbonis’s 105. The Serbian was quite aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kecmanovic scored 13 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Miomir Kecmanovic was very efficent on serve to win 87% (46/53) of his 1st serve and 60% (29/48) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Serbian broke Delbonis twice after converting 17% of his break points (2/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Kecmanovic has lost 2 set in this event to win 55% of the points he played.
Kecmanovic has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 64% of his matches (195-111). 3-0 on clay in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Kecmanovic has a 86-43 record in the last 6 years on clay.
Miomir’s best result of the season was reaching the semi-finals in Doha and New York.
Kecmanovic has a 13-7 win-loss record in 2020, 3-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Kitzbuhel
Kecmanovic didn’t play in Kitzbuhel in 2019.
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Ranked no. 303, Marc-Andrea got to the semifinal after defeating Attila Balazs 6-4 6-0, Prajnesh Gunneswaran 6-3 6-3, Emil Ruusuvuori 3-6 6-4 7-62, Fabio Fognini 6-1 6-2 and Feliciano Lopez 6-4 6-3.
In the quarter, Huesler had a good straight sets win against Lopez (6-4 6-3). During the match Huesler scored 75 points vs Lopez’s 58. Huesler was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Huesler blasted 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Marc-Andrea Huesler was very effective on serve to win 76% (22/29) of his 1st serve and 59% (16/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Marc-Andrea broke Lopez 4 times after converting 29% of his break points (4/14).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Huesler has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
Huesler has a 7-1 win-loss record in 2020, 7-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Kitzbuhel
The Swiss lost in the qualifications to Matthias Bachinger.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Kecmanovic | Huesler |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 5 |
Tot Set | 8 | 11 |
Tot Games | 79 | 100 |
Pts | 261-215 | 357-274 |
Total Points | 476 | 631 |
Winners | 94 | 116 |
%Winners | 36% | 32% |
Kecmanovic played 3 matches while Huesler competed in 5 matches. Huesler started his run from the qualifications while Kecmanovic had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Miomir Kecmanovic conceded 2 sets, while Marc-Andrea Huesler dropper 1 set. Kecmanovic has played 3 set(s) less than Huesler (8 vs 11). Therefore, Kecmanovic played 21 games less than Huesler. Miomir scored 94 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, The Swiss blasted 116 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Kecmanovic | Huesler |
---|---|---|
Aces | 22 | 28 |
Avg per match | 7.3 | 5.6 |
1st in | 118/221 | 153/290 |
%1st in | 53% | 53% |
1st pts | 94/118 | 116/153 |
%1st pts | 80% | 76% |
2nd pts | 60/103 | 84/137 |
%2nd pts | 58% | 61% |
Kecmanovic made 22 aces (7.3 per match). Huesler fired 28 aces (5.6 per match). Kecmanovic won 80% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Huesler won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Kecmanovic | Huesler |
---|---|---|
Won | 13 | 20 |
Converted | 13/30 | 20/58 |
% Converted | 43% | 34% |
Conceded | 10 | 19 |
Saved | 5 | 13 |
% Saved | 50% | 68% |
Times Broken | 5 | 6 |
Kecmanovic broke his opponents 13 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Serbian conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Huesler broke his opponents 20 times with a 34% conversion rate. Huesler conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 68% of the break points that he conceded.
Kecmanovic | |||||
R1 Nishikori |
R2 Thompson |
1/4 Delbonis |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | 6-2 6-2 | 6-4 6-75 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
Tot Games | 28 | 16 | 35 | 79 | |
pts | 86-74 | 61-36 | 114-105 | 261-215 | |
Total points | 160 | 97 | 219 | 476 | |
Winners | 24 | 24 | 46 | 94 | |
%Winners | 28% | 39% | 40% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 3 | 6 | 13 | 22 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 | |
1st in | 36/75 | 29/45 | 53/101 | 118/221 | |
% 1st in | 48% | 64% | 52% | 53% | |
1st pts | 24/36 | 24/29 | 46/53 | 94/118 | |
% 1st pts | 67% | 83% | 87% | 80% | |
2nd pts | 21/39 | 10/16 | 29/48 | 60/103 | |
% 2nd pts | 54% | 63% | 60% | 58% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 7 | 4 | 2 | 13 | |
Converted | 7/10 | 4/8 | 2/12 | 13/30 | |
Converted % | 70% | 50% | 17% | 43% | |
Conceded | 6 | 1 | 3 | 10 | |
Saved | 1/6 | 1/1 | 3/3 | 5 | |
Saved % | 17% | 100% | 100% | 72% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
Huesler | |||||||
Q1 Balazs |
Q3 Gunneswaran |
R1 Ruusuvuori |
R2 Fognini |
1/4 Lopez |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-0 | 6-3 6-3 | 3-6 6-4 7-62 | 6-1 6-2 | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 11 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 18 | 32 | 15 | 19 | 100 | |
pts | 60-39 | 63-44 | 101-102 | 58-31 | 75-58 | 357-274 | |
Total points | 99 | 107 | 203 | 89 | 133 | 631 | |
Winners | 18 | 21 | 33 | 22 | 22 | 116 | |
%Winners | 30% | 33% | 33% | 38% | 29% | 32% | |
SERVE | |||||||
Aces | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 28 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 13 | |
1st in | 23/42 | 23/46 | 53/102 | 25/44 | 29/56 | 153/290 | |
% 1st in | 55% | 50% | 52% | 57% | 52% | 53% | |
1st pts | 18/23 | 21/23 | 33/53 | 22/25 | 22/29 | 116/153 | |
% 1st pts | 78% | 91% | 62% | 88% | 76% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 12/19 | 16/23 | 28/49 | 12/19 | 16/27 | 84/137 | |
% 2nd pts | 63% | 70% | 57% | 63% | 59% | 61% | |
Breaks | |||||||
Won | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 20 | |
Converted | 5/15 | 3/11 | 4/9 | 4/9 | 4/14 | 20/58 | |
Converted % | 33% | 27% | 44% | 44% | 29% | 34% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 19 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 2/2 | 4/8 | 3/3 | 3/4 | 13 | |
Saved % | 50% | 100% | 50% | 100% | 75% | 125% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Kitzbuhel
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Feliciano LopezLopez (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Federico DelbonisDelbonis (6-4 6-75 7-5) – See score progression
- Laslo DjereDjere – Diego Sebastian SchwartzmanSebastian Schwartzman (7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Maximilian MartererMarterer (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Laslo DjereDjere (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction