Dominic Thiem and Felix Auger Aliassime will face off in the 4th round of the U.S. Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 2 pm on Arthur Ashe Stadium. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Dominic Thiem who should win in 5 sets.
As per the initial odds, Dominic Thiem is the pick to win this match.
Dominic Thiem -> 1.43
Felix Auger Aliassime -> 2.74
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Dominic Thiem vs. Felix Auger Aliassime
There is no head to head record between Dominic Thiem and Felix Auger Aliassime since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Dominic Thiem
Ranked no. 3 (career high), the Austrian got to the 4th round after defeating Jaume Antoni Munar Clar 7-66 6-3 ret., Sumit Nagal 6-3 6-3 6-2 and Marin Cilic 6-2 6-2 3-6 6-3.
In the 3rd round, Dominic had a good straight sets win against Cilic (6-2 6-2 3-6 6-3). During the match Thiem scored 110 points vs Cilic’s 92. Dominic was very aggressive to blast 53 winners.
Talking about the service games, Thiem fired 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Dominic Thiem lost the serve once and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Thiem put 59% of his first serves in, winning 87% (53/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (20/43) on the 2nd serve. The Austrian broke Cilic 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Dominic has surrendered 1 set in this competition to win 57% of the points he played.
Thiem has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 67% of his matches (411-206). 10-4 on hard in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Thiem has a 113-76 record in the last years on hard.
Dominic’s best result of the season was reaching the final at the Australian Open .
Dominic has a 12-5 win-loss record in 2020, 10-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Felix Auger Aliassime
Ranked no. 21, Auger-Aliassime got to the 4th round after defeating Thiago Moura Monteiro 6-3 6-77 7-66 7-66, Andy Murray 6-2 6-3 6-4 and Corentin Moutet 6-1 6-0 6-4.
In the 3rd round, Felix had a good straight sets win against Moutet (6-1 6-0 6-4). During the match Auger-Aliassime scored 95 points vs Moutet’s 57. The Canadian was pretty aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about serving, Auger-Aliassime made 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Felix Auger Aliassime was exceptionally effective on serve to win 73% (36/49) of his 1st serve and 63% (17/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Auger-Aliassime broke Moutet 7 times after converting 50% of his break points (7/14).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Canadian has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
The Canadian’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in Rotterdam and Marseille.
The Canadian has a 17-10 win-loss record in 2020, 8-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Thiem | Auger-Aliassime |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 60 | 98 |
| Pts | 207-159 | 340-272 |
| Total Points | 366 | 612 |
| Winners | 88 | 156 |
| %Winners | 43% | 46% |
Thiem played 2 matches while Auger-Aliassime competed in 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Dominic Thiem conceded 1 set, while Felix Auger Aliassime dropper 1 set. Thiem has played 3 set(s) less than Auger-Aliassime (7 vs 10). Therefore, Thiem played 38 games less than Auger-Aliassime. The Austrian scored 88 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Felix made 156 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Thiem | Auger-Aliassime |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 16 | 47 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 15.7 |
| 1st in | 108/178 | 189/296 |
| %1st in | 61% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 88/108 | 156/189 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 38/70 | 63/107 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 59% |
Thiem scored 16 aces (8 per match). Auger-Aliassime struck 47 aces (15.7 per match). Thiem won 81% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Auger-Aliassime won 83% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Thiem | Auger-Aliassime |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 12 | 12 |
| Converted | 12/25 | 12/31 |
| % Converted | 48% | 39% |
| Conceded | 16 | 6 |
| Saved | 13 | 5 |
| % Saved | 81% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
Dominic broke his opponents 12 times with a 48% conversion rate. Dominic lost his serve 3 times and he saved 81% of the break points that he conceded. Felix broke his opponents 12 times with a 39% conversion rate. Felix conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Thiem | |||||
| R1 Antoni Munar Clar |
R2 Nagal |
R3 Cilic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 6-3 ret. | 6-3 6-3 6-2 | 6-2 6-2 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 26 | 34 | 82 | |
| pts | 78-66 | 97-67 | 110-92 | 285-225 | |
| Total points | 144 | 164 | 202 | 510 | |
| Winners | 31 | 35 | 53 | 119 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 36% | 48% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 7 | 9 | 25 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 43/68 | 47/74 | 61/104 | 151/246 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 64% | 59% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 31/43 | 35/47 | 53/61 | 119/151 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 74% | 87% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 18/27 | 20/43 | 53/95 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 67% | 47% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 7 | 5 | 15 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 7/15 | 5/10 | 15/35 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 47% | 50% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 8 | 8 | 23 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 6/8 | 7/8 | 18 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 75% | 88% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |
| Auger-Aliassime | |||||
| R1 Moura Monteiro |
R2 Murray |
R3 Moutet |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-77 7-66 7-66 | 6-2 6-3 6-4 | 6-1 6-0 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 4 | 3 | 3 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 48 | 27 | 23 | 98 | |
| pts | 148-147 | 97-68 | 95-57 | 340-272 | |
| Total points | 295 | 165 | 152 | 612 | |
| Winners | 79 | 41 | 36 | 156 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 42% | 38% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 18 | 24 | 5 | 47 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 2 | 4 | 14 | |
| 1st in | 94/150 | 46/70 | 49/76 | 189/296 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 66% | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 79/94 | 41/46 | 36/49 | 156/189 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 89% | 73% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 31/56 | 15/24 | 17/27 | 63/107 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 63% | 63% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 1 | 4 | 7 | 12 | |
| Converted | 1/8 | 4/9 | 7/14 | 12/31 | |
| Converted % | 13% | 44% | 50% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 0/0 | 3/4 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | – | 75% | 58% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLLLWL
Tennis Scores at the U.S. Open
- Borna CoricCoric – Jordan ThompsonThompson (7-5 6-1 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (6-2 6-2 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta – Novak DjokovicDjokovic (6-5 def.) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Vasek PospisilPospisil – Alex De MinaurDe Minaur (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Borna CoricCoric – Alexander ZverevZverev (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini – Andrey RublevRublev (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Daniil MedvedevMedvedev (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – David GoffinGoffin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime – Dominic ThiemThiem (0-0) – H2H and prediction
