Serena Williams and Sloane Stephens will face off in the 3rd round of the U.S. Open for the 7th time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 2 pm on Arthur Ashe Stadium. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Serena Williams who should win in 2 sets.
Serena Williams -> 1.3
Sloane Stephens -> 3.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Serena Williams vs. Sloane Stephens
This will be the 7th time that Serena Williams and Sloane Stephens square off. The head to head is 5-1 for Williams (see full H2H stats), 3-1 on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Williams won 6-4 6-0 in the 2nd round in Madrid back in 2015.
Serena Williams
Ranked no. 8, the American reached the 2nd round after beating Kristie Ahn 7-5 6-3 and Margarita Gasparyan 6-2 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Williams had a good straight sets win against Gasparyan (6-2 6-4). During the match Williams scored 72 points vs Gasparyan’s 58. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about the service games, Williams managed to score 7 aces and she committed only 5 double faults. Serena Williams lost the serve 3 times and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Williams put 58% of her first serves in, winning 62% (21/34) of the points behind her 1st serve and 48% (12/25) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Gasparyan 6 times after converting 50% of her break points (6/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Serena hasn’t dropped yet a set in this event to win 56% of the points she played.
Williams has a a terrific win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 89% of her matches (370-48). 12-3 on hard in 2020. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this competition, Williams has a 216-32 record in the last years on hard.
Her best result of the season was managing to win the title in Auckland where she defeated Jessica Pegula in the final 6-3 6-4.
Williams has a 13-4 win-loss record in 2020, 12-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year at the U.S. Open
The American lost in the Pre-q to .
Sloane Stephens
Ranked no. 39, Stephens reached the 2nd round after beating Mihaela Buzarnescu 6-3 6-3 and Olga Govortsova 6-2 6-2.
In the 2nd round, The American had a good straight sets win against Govortsova (6-2 6-2). During the match Stephens scored 61 points vs Govortsova’s 42. Stephens was quite aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Stephens blasted 4 aces and she was extremely steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Sloane Stephens lost the serve once and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Stephens put 73% of her first serves in, winning 63% (27/43) of the points behind her 1st serve and 63% (10/16) on the 2nd serve. Sloane broke Govortsova 5 times after converting 71% of her break points (5/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Stephens hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 58% of the points she played.
The American has a 3-7 win-loss record in 2020, 3-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year at the U.S. Open
Sloane lost in the Pre-q to .
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Williams | Stephens |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
Tot Games | 39 | 34 |
Pts | 142-111 | 129-93 |
Total Points | 253 | 222 |
Winners | 54 | 57 |
%Winners | 38% | 44% |
Both Williams and Stephens played 2 matches. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Williams and Stephens have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Williams played 5 games more than Stephens. Serena scored 54 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Stephens struck 57 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Williams | Stephens |
---|---|---|
Aces | 20 | 6 |
Avg per match | 10 | 3 |
1st in | 73/122 | 86/117 |
%1st in | 60% | 74% |
1st pts | 54/73 | 57/86 |
%1st pts | 74% | 66% |
2nd pts | 21/49 | 17/31 |
%2nd pts | 43% | 55% |
Williams made 20 aces (10 per match). Stephens scored 6 aces (3 per match). Williams won 74% points behind her first serve. She pretty effective on her second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Stephens won 66% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Williams | Stephens |
---|---|---|
Won | 10 | 10 |
Converted | 10/18 | 10/17 |
% Converted | 56% | 59% |
Conceded | 9 | 11 |
Saved | 4 | 8 |
% Saved | 44% | 73% |
Times Broken | 5 | 3 |
The American broke her opponents 10 times with a 56% conversion rate. Williams conceded her serve 5 times and she saved 44% of the break points that she conceded. Stephens broke her opponents 10 times with a 59% conversion rate. The American conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 73% of the break points that she conceded.
Williams | ||||
R1 Ahn | R2 Gasparyan | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-3 | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 18 | 39 | |
pts | 70-53 | 72-58 | 142-111 | |
Total points | 123 | 130 | 253 | |
Winners | 33 | 21 | 54 | |
%Winners | 47% | 29% | 38% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 13 | 7 | 20 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 5 | 8 | |
1st in | 39/63 | 34/59 | 73/122 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 58% | 60% | |
1st pts | 33/39 | 21/34 | 54/73 | |
% 1st pts | 85% | 62% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 9/24 | 12/25 | 21/49 | |
% 2nd pts | 38% | 48% | 43% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
Converted | 4/6 | 6/12 | 10/18 | |
Converted % | 67% | 50% | 56% | |
Conceded | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
Saved | 1/3 | 3/6 | 4 | |
Saved % | 33% | 50% | 42% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Stephens | ||||
R1 Buzarnescu | R2 Govortsova | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 16 | 34 | |
pts | 68-51 | 61-42 | 129-93 | |
Total points | 119 | 103 | 222 | |
Winners | 30 | 27 | 57 | |
%Winners | 44% | 44% | 44% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
1st in | 43/58 | 43/59 | 86/117 | |
% 1st in | 74% | 73% | 74% | |
1st pts | 30/43 | 27/43 | 57/86 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | 63% | 66% | |
2nd pts | 7/15 | 10/16 | 17/31 | |
% 2nd pts | 47% | 63% | 55% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
Converted | 5/10 | 5/7 | 10/17 | |
Converted % | 50% | 71% | 59% | |
Conceded | 5 | 6 | 11 | |
Saved | 3/5 | 5/6 | 8 | |
Saved % | 60% | 83% | 72% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Tennis Scores at the U.S. Open
- Petra MarticMartic – Varvara GrachevaGracheva (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva – Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich (3-6 6-2 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Anett KontaveitKontaveit – Magda LinetteLinette (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Naomi OsakaOsaka – Marta KostyukKostyuk (6-3 6-74 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jennifer BradyBrady – Caroline GarciaGarcia (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Angelique KerberKerber – Ann LiLi (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Shelby RogersShelby – Madison BrengleMadison (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Petra KvitovaKvitova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Madison KeysKeys – Alize CornetCornet (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Donna VekicVekic – Tsvetana PironkovaPironkova (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Maria SakkariSakkari – Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sloane StephensStephens – Serena WilliamsWilliams (1-5) – H2H and prediction
- Victoria AzarenkaAzarenka – Iga SwiatekSwiatek (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Karolina MuchovaMuchova – Sorana CirsteaCirstea (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elise MertensMertens – Caty McNallyMcNally (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ons JabeurJabeur – Sofia KeninKenin (1-4) – H2H and prediction
- Jennifer BradyBrady – Angelique KerberKerber (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva – Petra MarticMartic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Naomi OsakaOsaka – Anett KontaveitKontaveit (4-0) – H2H and prediction