Botic Van De Zandschulp and Lukas Lacko will face off in the quarter of the Ostrava Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 1.30 pm on Court 3. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.35
Lukas Lacko -> 3.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Lukas Lacko
There is no head to head record between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Lukas Lacko since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Ranked no. 176, Van De Zandschulp got to the quarter after beating Otto Virtanen 7-5 6-4 and Henri Laaksonen 6-3 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Van De Zandschulp had a good straight sets win against Laaksonen (6-3 6-2). During the match Van De Zandschulp scored 68 points vs Laaksonen’s 52. The Dutch was exceptionally aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about the service games, Van De Zandschulp fired 4 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Overall, Botic Van De Zandschulp was quite effective on serve to win 73% (19/26) of his 1st serve and 54% (15/28) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Dutch broke Laaksonen 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Dutch hasn’t lost yet a set in this event to win 56% of the points he played.
Van De Zandschulp’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Koblenz Challenger.
Botic has a 8-8 win-loss record in 2020, 3-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Ostrava Challenger
Van De Zandschulp didn’t play in the Ostrava Challenger in 2019.
Lukas Lacko
Ranked no. 177, the Slovakian got to the quarter after beating Filip Horansky 7-66 6-2 and Frederico Ferreira Silva 6-4 7-5.
In the 2nd round, The Slovakian had a good straight sets win against Ferreira Silva (6-4 7-5). During the match Lacko scored 72 points vs Ferreira Silva’s 63. The Slovakian was pretty aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Lacko managed to score 4 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Lukas Lacko lost the serve 3 times. Furthermore, Lacko put 51% of his first serves in, winning 78% (25/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (13/31) on the 2nd serve. Lacko broke Ferreira Silva 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Lukas hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Lacko’s best result of the year was getting to the semi-finals in the Quimper Challenger.
The Slovakian has a 6-7 win-loss record in 2020, 2-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Ostrava Challenger
Lukas didn’t play in the Ostrava Challenger in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Lacko |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 39 | 43 |
| Pts | 133-106 | 151-134 |
| Total Points | 239 | 285 |
| Winners | 52 | 43 |
| %Winners | 39% | 28% |
Both Van De Zandschulp and Lacko played 2 matches. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Van De Zandschulp and Lacko have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Van De Zandschulp played 4 games less than Lacko. Botic scored 52 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Slovakian managed to score 43 winners (28%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Lacko |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 3.5 | 3 |
| 1st in | 67/116 | 63/135 |
| %1st in | 58% | 47% |
| 1st pts | 52/67 | 43/63 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 27/49 | 37/72 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 51% |
Van De Zandschulp made 7 aces (3.5 per match). Lacko fired 6 aces (3 per match). Van De Zandschulp won 78% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Lacko won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Lacko |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 9 |
| Converted | 8/15 | 9/19 |
| % Converted | 53% | 47% |
| Conceded | 7 | 8 |
| Saved | 5 | 3 |
| % Saved | 71% | 38% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 5 |
Van De Zandschulp broke his opponents 8 times with a 53% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Lacko broke his opponents 9 times with a 47% conversion rate. Lacko conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 38% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van De Zandschulp | ||||
| R1 Virtanen |
R2 Laaksonen |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 17 | 39 | |
| pts | 65-54 | 68-52 | 133-106 | |
| Total points | 119 | 120 | 239 | |
| Winners | 33 | 19 | 52 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 28% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 7 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 41/62 | 26/54 | 67/116 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 48% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 33/41 | 19/26 | 52/67 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 73% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/21 | 15/28 | 27/49 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 54% | 55% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 8 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 5/11 | 8/15 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 45% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 2 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 1/2 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 50% | 65% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Lacko | ||||
| R1 Horansky |
R2 Ferreira Silva |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 6-2 | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 22 | 43 | |
| pts | 79-71 | 72-63 | 151-134 | |
| Total points | 150 | 135 | 285 | |
| Winners | 18 | 25 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 23% | 35% | 28% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 31/72 | 32/63 | 63/135 | |
| % 1st in | 43% | 51% | 47% | |
| 1st pts | 18/31 | 25/32 | 43/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 58% | 78% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/41 | 13/31 | 37/72 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 42% | 51% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 5/8 | 9/19 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 63% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 0/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 0% | 30% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLLWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Mats MoraingMoraing (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Lukas LackoLacko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Oscar OtteOtte (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
