Henri Laaksonen and Botic Van De Zandschulp will square off in the 2nd round of the Ostrava Challenger for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1 pm on Court 3. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Henri Laaksonen who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Henri Laaksonen is the pick to win this match.
Henri Laaksonen -> 1.615
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 2.25
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Henri Laaksonen vs. Botic Van De Zandschulp
This will be the 2nd time that Henri Laaksonen and Botic Van De Zandschulp square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Van De Zandschulp (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
Henri Laaksonen
Ranked no. 130, the Swiss reached the 2nd round after beating Brayden Schnur 7-5 6-1.
In the 1st round, Henri had a good straight sets win against Schnur (7-5 6-1). During the match Laaksonen scored 85 points vs Schnur’s 71. Henri was extremely aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about the service games, Laaksonen bagged 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Henri Laaksonen was extremely effective on serve to win 72% (18/25) of his 1st serve and 51% (18/35) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Swiss broke Schnur 6 times after converting 23% of his break points (6/26).
Laaksonen has a winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (781-649). 4-2 on clay in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Laaksonen has a 346-280 record in the last 10 years on clay.
The Swiss has a 5-7 win-loss record in 2020, 4-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Ostrava Challenger
The Swiss didn’t compete in the Ostrava Challenger in 2019.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Ranked no. 176, Van De Zandschulp reached the 2nd round after beating Otto Virtanen 7-5 6-4.
In the 1st round, Van De Zandschulp had a good straight sets win against Virtanen (7-5 6-4). During the match Van De Zandschulp scored 65 points vs Virtanen’s 54. The Dutch was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Van De Zandschulp scored 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Botic Van De Zandschulp was extremely effective on serve to win 80% (33/41) of his 1st serve and 57% (12/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Botic broke Virtanen 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Van De Zandschulp has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 63% of his matches (288-166). 2-2 on clay in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Van De Zandschulp has a 183-91 record in the last 6 years on clay.
The Dutch’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Koblenz Challenger.
Botic has a 7-8 win-loss record in 2020, 2-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Ostrava Challenger
Van De Zandschulp didn’t play in the Ostrava Challenger in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Laaksonen | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 22 |
| Pts | 85-71 | 65-54 |
| Total Points | 156 | 119 |
| Winners | 18 | 33 |
| %Winners | 21% | 51% |
Both Laaksonen and Van De Zandschulp played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Laaksonen and Van De Zandschulp have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Laaksonen played 3 games less than Van De Zandschulp. The Swiss scored 18 winners (21% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch struck 33 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Laaksonen | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
| 1st in | 25/60 | 41/62 |
| %1st in | 42% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 18/25 | 33/41 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 18/35 | 12/21 |
| %2nd pts | 51% | 57% |
Laaksonen blasted 3 aces . Van De Zandschulp made 3 aces . Laaksonen won 72% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Van De Zandschulp won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Laaksonen | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 3 |
| Converted | 6/26 | 3/4 |
| % Converted | 23% | 75% |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 |
| Saved | 3 | 4 |
| % Saved | 60% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Henri broke his opponent 6 times with a 23% conversion rate. Henri conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. The Dutch broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Laaksonen | |||
| R1 Schnur |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 85-71 | 85-71 | |
| Total points | 156 | 156 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 21% | 21% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 25/60 | 25/60 | |
| % 1st in | 42% | 42% | |
| 1st pts | 18/25 | 18/25 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/35 | 18/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/26 | 6/26 | |
| Converted % | 23% | 23% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| R1 Virtanen |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 65-54 | 65-54 | |
| Total points | 119 | 119 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 41/62 | 41/62 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 33/41 | 33/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/21 | 12/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
L Tennis Scores in Ostrava Challenger
- Lukas RosolRosol – Hyeon ChungChung (2-6 6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Oscar OtteOtte – Aleksandar VukicVukic (3-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Robin HaaseHaase (4-6 6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Ilya IvashkaIvashka – Vit KoprivaKopriva (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Steven DiezDiez – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Tomas MachacMachac (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Brayden SchnurSchnur (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (6-3 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Lukas LackoLacko – Filip HoranskyHoransky (7-66 6-2) – See score progression
- Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky – Peter PolanskyPolansky (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Viktor TroickiTroicki – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (3-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Renzo OlivoOlivo (7-5 6-0) – See score progression
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Martin KlizanKlizan (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Ernests GulbisGulbis – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lukas LackoLacko – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernests GulbisGulbis – Aslan KaratsevKaratsev (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor TroickiTroicki – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Steven DiezDiez – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Oscar OtteOtte – Lukas RosolRosol (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Zdenek KolarKolar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
