Sergiy Stakhovsky and Mats Moraing will play each other in the 2nd round of the Ostrava Challenger for the 3rd time of their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 12 pm on Court 3. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mats Moraing who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mats Moraing is the pick to win this match.
Mats Moraing -> 1.3
Sergiy Stakhovsky -> 3.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Sergiy Stakhovsky vs. Mats Moraing
This will be the 3rd time that Sergiy Stakhovsky and Mats Moraing play each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Stakhovsky and Moraing (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Moraing won 6-4 6-3 in the semifinal in the Koblenz Challenger back in 2018.
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Ranked no. 173, the Ukrainian reached the semifinal after defeating Peter Polansky 4-6 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round against Polansky, The Ukrainian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-3). During the match Stakhovsky scored 97 points vs Polansky’s 83. Stakhovsky was extremely aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about the service games, Stakhovsky fired 7 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Sergiy Stakhovsky was extremely effective on serve to win 83% (44/53) of his 1st serve and 56% (22/39) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Stakhovsky broke Polansky twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).
Stakhovsky has a weak record in the last 10 years having won only 47% of his matches (280-315). 2-2 on clay in 2020. . In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Stakhovsky has a 348-308 win-loss record in the last 10 years on clay.
Sergiy has a 8-9 win-loss record in 2020, 2-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Ostrava Challenger
The Ukrainian didn’t play in the Ostrava Challenger in 2019.
Mats Moraing
Ranked no. 257, Moraing got to the semifinal after beating Alexander Ritschard 6-2 6-2, Malek Jaziri 3-6 6-3 6-3 and Renzo Olivo 7-5 6-0.
In the 1st round, The German had a good straight sets win against Olivo (7-5 6-0). During the match Moraing scored 64 points vs Olivo’s 39. The German was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Moraing made 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Mats Moraing was extremely effective on serve to win 83% (25/30) of his 1st serve and 59% (13/22) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Moraing broke Olivo 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Moraing has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 59% of his matches (376-265). 5-2 on clay in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Moraing has a 295-173 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
Moraing has a 8-8 win-loss record in 2020, 5-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Ostrava Challenger
The German didn’t compete in the Ostrava Challenger in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Stakhovsky | Moraing |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 61 |
| Pts | 97-83 | 222-169 |
| Total Points | 180 | 391 |
| Winners | 44 | 70 |
| %Winners | 45% | 32% |
Stakhovsky played 1 match while Moraing competed in 3 matches. Moraing started his run from the qualifications while Stakhovsky had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Sergiy Stakhovsky conceded 1 set, while Mats Moraing dropper 1 set. Stakhovsky has played 4 set(s) less than Moraing (3 vs 7). Therefore, Stakhovsky played 32 games less than Moraing. Stakhovsky scored 44 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Mats blasted 70 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Stakhovsky | Moraing |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 17 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 5.7 |
| 1st in | 53/92 | 92/176 |
| %1st in | 58% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 44/53 | 70/92 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 22/39 | 51/84 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 61% |
Stakhovsky scored 7 aces . Moraing scored 17 aces (5.7 per match). Stakhovsky won 83% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Moraing won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Stakhovsky | Moraing |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 13 |
| Converted | 2/8 | 13/29 |
| % Converted | 25% | 45% |
| Conceded | 7 | 10 |
| Saved | 6 | 7 |
| % Saved | 86% | 70% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Sergiy broke his opponent twice with a 25% conversion rate. The Ukrainian dropped his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded. Moraing broke his opponents 13 times with a 45% conversion rate. Moraing conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.
| Stakhovsky | |||
| R1 Polansky |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 97-83 | 97-83 | |
| Total points | 180 | 180 | |
| Winners | 44 | 44 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 53/92 | 53/92 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 44/53 | 44/53 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/39 | 22/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/8 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Moraing | |||||
| Q1 Ritschard |
Q3 Jaziri |
R1 Olivo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | 7-5 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 27 | 18 | 61 | |
| pts | 59-42 | 99-88 | 64-39 | 222-169 | |
| Total points | 101 | 187 | 103 | 391 | |
| Winners | 19 | 26 | 25 | 70 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 26% | 39% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 9 | 3 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 2 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 25/45 | 37/79 | 30/52 | 92/176 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 47% | 58% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 19/25 | 26/37 | 25/30 | 70/92 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 70% | 83% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/20 | 25/42 | 13/22 | 51/84 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 60% | 59% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 5 | 13 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/15 | 5/6 | 13/29 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 27% | 83% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 6 | 4 | 10 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 4/6 | 3/4 | 7 | |
| Saved % | – | 67% | 75% | 142% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Ostrava Challenger
- Lukas RosolRosol – Hyeon ChungChung (2-6 6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Ilya IvashkaIvashka – Vit KoprivaKopriva (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Steven DiezDiez – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Tomas MachacMachac (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (6-3 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Robin HaaseHaase (4-6 6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Brayden SchnurSchnur (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Oscar OtteOtte – Aleksandar VukicVukic (3-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Lukas LackoLacko – Filip HoranskyHoransky (7-66 6-2) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Viktor TroickiTroicki – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (3-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Ernests GulbisGulbis – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Renzo OlivoOlivo (7-5 6-0) – See score progression
- Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky – Peter PolanskyPolansky (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Martin KlizanKlizan (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lukas LackoLacko – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernests GulbisGulbis – Aslan KaratsevKaratsev (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor TroickiTroicki – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Steven DiezDiez – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Oscar OtteOtte – Lukas RosolRosol (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Zdenek KolarKolar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
