Mayar Sherif and Dalma Galfi will play each other in the 2nd round of the Prague Open for the 3rd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10 am on I.CLTK COURT 4. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mayar Sherif who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mayar Sherif is the pick to win this match.
Mayar Sherif -> 1.51
Dalma Galfi -> 2.49
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mayar Sherif vs. Dalma Galfi
This will be the 3rd time that Mayar Sherif and Dalma Galfi face off. The head to head is 2-0 for Sherif (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Sherif won 6-3 6-4 in the semifinal in the 1100046208 back in 2019.
Mayar Sherif
Ranked no. 170 (career high), the Egyptian got to the semifinal after beating Linda Noskova 7-63 7-5.
In the 1st round, Mayar had a good straight sets win against Noskova (7-63 7-5). During the match Sherif scored 89 points vs Noskova’s 73. The Egyptian was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sherif scored 5 aces and she was extremely steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Mayar Sherif lost the serve 4 times and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Sherif put 71% of her first serves in, winning 63% (34/54) of the points behind her 1st serve and 55% (12/22) on the 2nd serve. Mayar broke Noskova 5 times after converting 38% of her break points (5/13).
Sherif has a negative record in the last 4 years having won 20% of her matches (485-124). 9-1 on clay in 2020. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this competition, Sherif has a 133-58 win-loss record in the last 4 years on clay.
Mayar has a 11-5 win-loss record in 2020, 9-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Prague
Mayar didn’t compete in the Prague in 2019.
Dalma Galfi
Ranked no. 235, the Hungarian got to the semifinal after beating Jessika Ponchet 6-0 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Hungarian had a good straight sets win against Ponchet (6-0 6-2). During the match Galfi scored 57 points vs Ponchet’s 26. The Hungarian was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Galfi was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Dalma Galfi was extremely effective on serve to win 89% (25/28) of her 1st serve and 63% (5/8) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Galfi broke Ponchet 5 times after converting 63% of her break points (5/8).
Galfi has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 59% of her matches (334-231). 10-3 on clay in 2020. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Galfi has a 199-128 win-loss record in the last 7 years on clay.
Galfi’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the W25 Antalya.
The Hungarian has a 12-6 win-loss record in 2020, 10-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Prague
Dalma didn’t play in the Prague in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sherif | Galfi |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 25 | 14 |
| Pts | 89-73 | 57-26 |
| Total Points | 162 | 83 |
| Winners | 34 | 25 |
| %Winners | 38% | 44% |
Both Sherif and Galfi played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Sherif and Galfi have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Sherif played 11 games more than Galfi. Sherif scored 34 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Dalma blasted 25 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sherif | Galfi |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 0 |
| 1st in | 54/76 | 28/36 |
| %1st in | 71% | 78% |
| 1st pts | 34/54 | 25/28 |
| %1st pts | 63% | 89% |
| 2nd pts | 12/22 | 5/8 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 63% |
Sherif scored 5 aces . Galfi didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Sherif won 63% points behind her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Galfi won 89% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sherif | Galfi |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/8 |
| % Converted | 38% | 63% |
| Conceded | 8 | 0 |
| Saved | 4 | 0 |
| % Saved | 50% | NAN% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 |
Sherif broke her opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. Sherif dropped her serve 4 times and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded. Galfi broke her opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. The Hungarian was rock solid on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Sherif | |||
| R1 Noskova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 89-73 | 89-73 | |
| Total points | 162 | 162 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 54/76 | 54/76 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 34/54 | 34/54 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/22 | 12/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 4/8 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Galfi | |||
| R1 Ponchet |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 57-26 | 57-26 | |
| Total points | 83 | 83 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 28/36 | 28/36 | |
| % 1st in | 78% | 78% | |
| 1st pts | 25/28 | 25/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLLWWWW
LWWWWLWWWW Tennis Scores in Prague
- Maryna ZanevskaZanevska – Amandine HesseHesse (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Cagla BuyukakcayBuyukakcay – Grace MinMin (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Jaqueline CristianCristian – Tessah AndrianjafitrimoAndrianjafitrimo (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Anna DanilinaDanilina – Lesley KerkhoveKerkhove (6-75 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Renata ZarazuaZarazua – Eugenie BouchardBouchard (6-0 7-65) – See score progression
- Ana Sofia SanchezSofia Sanchez – Catherine HarrisonHarrison (3-6 6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Stephanie WagnerWagner – Anastasia GasanovaGasanova (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Robin AndersonAnderson – Dejana RadanovicRadanovic (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Cristina BucsaBucsa – Anastasiya KomardinaKomardina (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Diana MarcinkevicaMarcinkevica – Jovana JovicJovic (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Mirjam BjorklundBjorklund – Simona WaltertWaltert (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Clara TausonTauson – Linda FruhvirtovaFruhvirtova (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Marie BenoitBenoit – Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko (7-66 7-64) – See score progression
- Reka-Luca JaniJani – Urszula RadwanskaRadwanska (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Darja VidmanovaVidmanova (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Victoria KanKan – Gabriela TalabaTalaba (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Maja ChwalinskaChwalinska – Sara BejlekBejlek (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Anna BondarBondar – Daria SnigurSnigur (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Lucie HavlickovaHavlickova – Riya BhatiaBhatia (6-0 6-0) – See score progression
- Isabella ShinikovaShinikova – Eva Guerrero AlvarezGuerrero Alvarez (2-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Gabriela CeCe – Katie VolynetsVolynets (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Mariam BolkvadzeBolkvadze – Valeria SavinykhSavinykh (2-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Monica NiculescuNiculescu – Panna UdvardyUdvardy (7-66 7-64) – See score progression
- Sara ErraniErrani – Paula OrmaecheaOrmaechea (0-6 7-5 7-67) – See score progression
- Sabine LisickiLisicki – Samantha MurrayMurray (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Leonie KungKung – Ivana PopovicPopovic (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Andrea Lazaro GarciaLazaro Garcia – Lina GjorcheskaGjorcheska (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano – Julia GrabherGrabher (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Lara ArruabarrenaArruabarrena – Valentyna IvakhnenkoIvakhnenko (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Pemra OzgenOzgen – Natalija KosticKostic (7-5 6-77 6-4) – See score progression
- Rebecca SramkovaSramkova – Kristyna LavickovaLavickova (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Francesca JonesJones – Barbora PalicovaPalicova (6-74 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Harmony TanTan – Conny PerrinPerrin (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Yuki NaitoNaito – Harriet DartDart (1-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Dalma GalfiGalfi – Jessika PonchetPonchet (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Lara SaldenSalden – Nicoleta DascaluDascalu (3-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Daria LopatetskayaLopatetskaya – Indy De VroomeDe Vroome (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Chihiro MuramatsuMuramatsu – Jana CepelovaCepelova (7-65 1-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Laura-Ioana PaarPaar – Jule NiemeierNiemeier (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Miriam KolodziejovaKolodziejova – Basak EraydinEraydin (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Tena LukasLukas – Nikola BartunkovaBartunkova (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Irina FetecauFetecau (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Giulia Gatto-MonticoneGatto-Monticone – Jana FettFett (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Katharina GerlachGerlach – Denisa SatralovaSatralova (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto – Dalila JakupovicJakupovic (7-5 6-0) – See score progression
- Seone MendezMendez – Amanda CarrerasCarreras (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Olga DanilovicDanilovic – Marcela ZacariasZacarias (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Irina Maria BaraMaria Bara – Zuzana ZlochovaZlochova (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Mayar SherifSherif – Linda NoskovaNoskova (7-63 7-5) – See score progression
- Richel HogenkampHogenkamp – Chloe PaquetPaquet (1-6 6-1 7-63) – See score progression
- Georgina Garcia-PerezGarcia-Perez – Ekaterine GorgodzeGorgodze (6-4 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Kristina KucovaKucova – Tereza MrdezaMrdeza (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexandra CadantuCadantu – Jamie LoebLoeb (2-6 6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Bibiane SchoofsSchoofs – Ulrikke EikeriEikeri (5-7 6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Ivana JorovicJorovic – Lea BoskovicBoskovic (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Daniela SeguelSeguel – Katherine SebovSebov (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Jessica PieriPieri – Irene Burillo EscorihuelaBurillo Escorihuela (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova – Sofya LansereLansere (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Kyoka OkamuraOkamura (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elizabeth HalbauerHalbauer – Kathinka Von DeichmannVon Deichmann (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ankita RainaRaina – Marina MelnikovaMelnikova (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Martina TrevisanTrevisan – Diane ParryParry (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentini GrammatikopoulouGrammatikopoulou – Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elitsa KostovaKostova – Martina Di GiuseppeDi Giuseppe (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Monica NiculescuNiculescu – Andrea Lazaro GarciaLazaro Garcia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesca JonesJones – Rebecca SramkovaSramkova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sabine LisickiLisicki – Stephanie WagnerWagner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harmony TanTan – Chihiro MuramatsuMuramatsu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laura-Ioana AndreiAndrei – Kristina KucovaKucova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mariam BolkvadzeBolkvadze – Maja ChwalinskaChwalinska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clara TausonTauson – Sara ErraniErrani (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Leonie KungKung – Ana Sofia SanchezSofia Sanchez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jessica PieriPieri – Dasha LopatetskayaLopatetskaya (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mayar SherifSherif – Dalma GalfiGalfi (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivana JorovicJorovic – Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Irina Maria BaraMaria Bara – Seone MendezMendez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Victoria KanKan – Marie BenoitBenoit (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cagla BuyukakcayBuyukakcay – Gabriela CeCe (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tena LukasLukas – Giulia Gatto-MonticoneGatto-Monticone (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Lara ArruabarrenaArruabarrena – Mirjam BjorklundBjorklund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maryna ZanevskaZanevska – Isabella ShinikovaShinikova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano – Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lara SaldenSalden – Richel HogenkampHogenkamp (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Renata ZarazuaZarazua – Reka-Luca JaniJani (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miriam KolodziejovaKolodziejova – Yuki NaitoNaito (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova – Alexandra CadantuCadantu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Diana MarcinkevicaMarcinkevica – Jaqueline CristianCristian (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anna DanilinaDanilina – Pemra OzgenOzgen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Georgina Garcia-PerezGarcia-Perez – Olga DanilovicDanilovic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bibiane SchoofsSchoofs – Katharina GerlachGerlach (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniela SeguelSeguel – Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto (0-1) – H2H and prediction
