Henri Laaksonen and Yannick Maden will face off in the 3rd round of the Prague Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1.30 pm on Court 4. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Yannick Maden who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Yannick Maden is the pick to win this match.
Yannick Maden -> 1.80
Henri Laaksonen -> 1.90
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Henri Laaksonen vs. Yannick Maden
There is no head to head record between Henri Laaksonen and Yannick Maden since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Henri Laaksonen
Ranked no. 137, the Swiss got to the 3rd round after beating Jan Satral 6-3 3-6 7-5.
In the 2nd round, Henri defeated Satral (6-3 3-6 7-5). During the match Laaksonen scored 108 points vs Satral’s 94. Laaksonen was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Laaksonen blasted 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Henri Laaksonen was extremely effective on serve to win 75% (27/36) of his 1st serve and 66% (33/50) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Laaksonen broke Satral 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Laaksonen has a good win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (761-639). 2-1 on clay in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Laaksonen has a 344-279 win-loss record in the last 10 years on clay.
The Swiss has a 3-6 win-loss record in 2020, 2-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Prague Challenger
The Swiss didn’t play in the Prague Challenger in 2019.
Yannick Maden
Ranked no. 149, the German got to the 3rd round after beating Arthur De Greef 6-3 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Yannick had a good straight sets win against De Greef (6-3 6-4). During the match Maden scored 77 points vs De Greef’s 66. The German was extremely aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about serving, Maden fired 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Yannick Maden lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Maden put 53% of his first serves in, winning 63% (20/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 61% (17/28) on the 2nd serve. The German broke De Greef 5 times after converting 36% of his break points (5/14).
Maden has a fantastic record in the last 7 years having won 70% of his matches (667-289). 1-0 on clay in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Maden has a 327-173 record in the last 7 years on clay.
The German has a 7-7 win-loss record in 2020, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Prague Challenger
Maden didn’t compete in the Prague Challenger in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Laaksonen | Maden |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 19 |
| Pts | 108-94 | 77-66 |
| Total Points | 202 | 143 |
| Winners | 27 | 20 |
| %Winners | 25% | 26% |
Both Laaksonen and Maden played 1 match. At the moment, Henri Laaksonen surrendered 1 set while Yannick Maden hasn’t dropped a set so far. Laaksonen has played 1 sets more than Maden (3 vs 2). Therefore, Laaksonen played 11 games more than Maden. Laaksonen scored 27 winners (25% of the total points). On the other side, Maden fired 20 winners (26%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Laaksonen | Maden |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 2 |
| 1st in | 36/86 | 32/60 |
| %1st in | 42% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 27/36 | 20/32 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 33/50 | 17/28 |
| %2nd pts | 66% | 61% |
Laaksonen recorded 6 aces . Maden fired 2 aces . Laaksonen won 75% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 66% of the points. On the other side, Maden won 63% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Laaksonen | Maden |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/12 | 5/14 |
| % Converted | 25% | 36% |
| Conceded | 4 | 5 |
| Saved | 2 | 3 |
| % Saved | 50% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Henri broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. The Swiss conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The German broke his opponent 5 times with a 36% conversion rate. Maden conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Laaksonen | |||
| R2 Satral |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 108-94 | 108-94 | |
| Total points | 202 | 202 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 25% | 25% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 36/86 | 36/86 | |
| % 1st in | 42% | 42% | |
| 1st pts | 27/36 | 27/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 33/50 | 33/50 | |
| % 2nd pts | 66% | 66% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 100 | |
| Maden | |||
| R2 De Greef |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 77-66 | 77-66 | |
| Total points | 143 | 143 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 26% | 26% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 32/60 | 32/60 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 20/32 | 20/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/28 | 17/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/14 | 5/14 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 100 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWWWWLL
Tennis Scores in Prague Challenger
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Jan SatralSatral (6-3 3-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Ernests GulbisGulbis – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (7-5 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Martin KlizanKlizan (6-2 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Steven DiezDiez (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Yannick MadenMaden – Arthur De GreefDe Greef (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Jiri VeselyVesely (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (5-7 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Oscar OtteOtte – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (2-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Adrian Menendez-MaceirasMenendez-Maceiras (4-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Blaz RolaRola (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Stan WawrinkaWawrinka – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (6-1 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Philipp KohlschreiberKohlschreiber – Mats MoraingMoraing (6-1 7-63) – See score progression
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Sebastian OfnerOfner (7-67 7-5) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (6-0 7-5) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Jay ClarkeClarke (6-3 5-7 4-1 ret.) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Philipp KohlschreiberKohlschreiber – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (0-0) – See H2H details
- Stan WawrinkaWawrinka – Oscar OtteOtte (0-0) – See H2H details
- Ernests GulbisGulbis – Aslan KaratsevKaratsev (0-0) – See H2H details
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Yannick MadenMaden (0-0) – See H2H details
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (0-0) – See H2H details
- Elias YmerYmer – Tomas MachacMachac (0-0) – See H2H details
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (0-0) – See H2H details
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Sumit NagalNagal (0-0) – See H2H details
