Jennifer Brady and Jil Teichmann will square off in the final of the The Top Seed Open for the 3rd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 11 am on Center Court. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jennifer Brady who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jennifer Brady is the pick to win this match.
Jennifer Brady -> 1.36
Jil Teichmann -> 3.20
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jennifer Brady vs. Jil Teichmann
This will be the 3rd time that Jennifer Brady and Jil Teichmann square off. The head to head is 1-1 (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they locked horns, Belen Teichmann won 7-5 7-612 in the 2nd round in Limoges back in 2019.
Jennifer Brady
Ranked no. 49, the American got to the 2nd round after beating Heather Watson 6-2 6-1, Magda Linette 6-2 6-3, Marie Bouzkova 6-1 6-2 and Cori Gauff 6-2 6-4.
In the semifinal, Brady had a good straight sets win against Gauff (6-2 6-4). During the match Brady scored 59 points vs Gauff’s 41. Brady was extremely aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about the service games, Brady managed to score 8 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Jennifer Brady was extremely effective on serve to win 85% (22/26) of her 1st serve and 58% (11/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. The American broke Gauff 4 times after converting 50% of her break points (4/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American hasn’t conceded yet a set in this competition to win 61% of the points she played.
Brady has a weak win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 36% of her matches (879-500). 16-4 on hard in 2020. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Brady has a 223-151 record in the last 7 years on hard.
The American’s best result of the current season was reaching the semi-finals in Dubai and Lexington.
Brady has a 16-5 win-loss record in 2020, 16-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Lexington
Jennifer didn’t play in Lexington in 2019.
Jil Teichmann
Ranked no. 63, Belen Teichmann reached the 2nd round after defeating Anna Kalinskaya 6-2 7-5, Yulia Putintseva 6-2 6-2, Catherine Cartan Bellis 6-2 6-4 and Shelby Rogers 6-3 6-2.
In the semifinal, Belen Teichmann had a good straight sets win against Rogers (6-3 6-2). During the match Belen Teichmann scored 62 points vs Rogers’s 42. The Swiss was extremely aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about serving, Belen Teichmann managed to score 5 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Jil Teichmann lost the serve twice and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Belen Teichmann put 46% of her first serves in, winning 80% (20/25) of the points behind her 1st serve and 48% (14/29) on the 2nd serve. The Swiss broke Rogers 5 times after converting 50% of her break points (5/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Swiss hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 59% of the points she played.
Belen Teichmann has a negative win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 48% of her matches (189-203). 7-5 on hard in 2020. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Belen Teichmann has a 204-135 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
The Swiss’s best result of the year was reaching the semi-finals in Lexington.
Belen Teichmann has a 10-5 win-loss record in 2020, 7-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Lexington
Belen Teichmann didn’t compete in Lexington in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Brady | Belen Teichmann |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 65 | 71 |
| Pts | 234-148 | 264-182 |
| Total Points | 382 | 446 |
| Winners | 88 | 89 |
| %Winners | 38% | 34% |
Both Brady and Belen Teichmann played 4 matches. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Brady and Belen Teichmann have played the same amount of sets 8. However, Brady played 6 games less than Belen Teichmann. Jennifer scored 88 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Swiss fired 89 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Brady | Belen Teichmann |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 31 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 7.8 | 2.8 |
| 1st in | 112/188 | 128/234 |
| %1st in | 60% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 88/112 | 89/128 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 44/76 | 56/106 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 53% |
Brady fired 31 aces (7.8 per match). Belen Teichmann bagged 11 aces (2.8 per match). Brady won 79% points behind her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Belen Teichmann won 70% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Brady | Belen Teichmann |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 18 | 22 |
| Converted | 18/31 | 22/33 |
| % Converted | 58% | 67% |
| Conceded | 8 | 25 |
| Saved | 5 | 16 |
| % Saved | 63% | 64% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 9 |
The American broke her opponents 18 times with a 58% conversion rate. The American dropped her serve 3 times and she saved 63% of the break points that she conceded. Belen Teichmann broke her opponents 22 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Swiss conceded her serve 9 times and she saved 64% of the break points that she conceded.
| Brady | ||||||
| R1 Watson |
R2 Linette |
1/4 Bouzkova |
1/2 Gauff |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | 6-2 6-3 | 6-1 6-2 | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 17 | 15 | 18 | 65 | |
| pts | 64-40 | 57-37 | 54-30 | 59-41 | 234-148 | |
| Total points | 104 | 94 | 84 | 100 | 382 | |
| Winners | 21 | 24 | 21 | 22 | 88 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 42% | 39% | 37% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 10 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 31 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 30/46 | 31/51 | 25/46 | 26/45 | 112/188 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 61% | 54% | 58% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 21/30 | 24/31 | 21/25 | 22/26 | 88/112 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 77% | 84% | 85% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/16 | 11/20 | 11/21 | 11/19 | 44/76 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 55% | 52% | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 18 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 4/4 | 5/7 | 4/8 | 18/31 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 100% | 71% | 50% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 1/2 | 2/3 | 0/1 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 50% | 67% | 0% | 54% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -25 | |
| Belen Teichmann | ||||||
| R1 Kalinskaya |
R2 Putintseva |
1/4 Cartan Bellis |
1/2 Rogers |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-5 | 6-2 6-2 | 6-2 6-4 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 16 | 18 | 17 | 71 | |
| pts | 68-43 | 66-44 | 68-53 | 62-42 | 264-182 | |
| Total points | 111 | 110 | 121 | 104 | 446 | |
| Winners | 23 | 20 | 26 | 20 | 89 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 30% | 38% | 32% | 34% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 16 | |
| 1st in | 33/59 | 29/53 | 41/68 | 25/54 | 128/234 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 55% | 60% | 46% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 23/33 | 20/29 | 26/41 | 20/25 | 89/128 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 69% | 63% | 80% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/26 | 12/24 | 14/27 | 14/29 | 56/106 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 50% | 52% | 48% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 22 | |
| Converted | 5/5 | 6/10 | 6/8 | 5/10 | 22/33 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 60% | 75% | 50% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 25 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 6/8 | 4/7 | 3/5 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 75% | 57% | 60% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 125 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLLWLW Upcoming matches
- Jil TeichmannTeichmann – Jennifer BradyBrady (1-1) – See H2H details
