Varvara Gracheva and Martina Trevisan will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Palermo Ladies Open for the 3rd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 4 pm on Center Court. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Varvara Gracheva who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Varvara Gracheva is the pick to win this match.
Varvara Gracheva -> 1.66
Martina Trevisan -> 2.10
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Varvara Gracheva vs. Martina Trevisan
This will be the 3rd time that Varvara Gracheva and Martina Trevisan square off. The head to head is 1-1 (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they fought against each other, Gracheva won 6-0 6-1 in the qualifications in at the U.S. Open back in 2019.
Varvara Gracheva
Ranked no. 101, the Russian got to the qualifications after defeating Matilde Paoletti 6-0 6-1.
In the qualifications, Gracheva had a good straight sets win against Paoletti (6-0 6-1). During the match Gracheva scored 54 points vs Paoletti’s 26. The Russian was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gracheva managed to score 2 aces and she committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Varvara Gracheva conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Gracheva put 69% of her first serves in, winning 76% (25/33) of the points behind her 1st serve and 47% (7/15) on the 2nd serve. The Russian broke Paoletti 5 times after converting 71% of her break points (5/7).
Gracheva has a losing record in the last 5 years having won 23% of her matches (316-96). 1-0 on clay in 2020. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this competition, Gracheva has a 141-67 record in the last 5 years on clay.
The Russian has a 4-6 win-loss record in 2020, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Palermo
Gracheva didn’t compete in Palermo in 2019.
Martina Trevisan
Ranked no. 151, Martina got to the qualifications after beating Giulia Gatto-Monticone 6-4 7-66.
In the qualifications, Martina had a good straight sets win against Gatto-Monticone (6-4 7-66). During the match Trevisan scored 75 points vs Gatto-Monticone’s 69. Martina was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Trevisan wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 4 double faults. Martina Trevisan lost the serve 6 times and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Trevisan put 67% of her first serves in, winning 60% (25/42) of the points behind her 1st serve and 29% (6/21) on the 2nd serve. Martina broke Gatto-Monticone 7 times after converting 58% of her break points (7/12).
Trevisan has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 69% of her matches (1060-479). 1-0 on clay in 2020. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Trevisan has a 188-99 win-loss record in the last 7 years on clay.
Martina has a 7-5 win-loss record in 2020, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Palermo
Martina lost in the 1st round 6-75 6-4 6-1 to Alize Cornet.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gracheva | Trevisan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 13 | 23 |
| Pts | 54-26 | 75-69 |
| Total Points | 80 | 144 |
| Winners | 25 | 25 |
| %Winners | 46% | 33% |
Both Gracheva and Trevisan played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gracheva and Trevisan have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gracheva played 10 games less than Trevisan. The Russian scored 25 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Trevisan scored 25 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gracheva | Trevisan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 0 |
| 1st in | 33/48 | 42/63 |
| %1st in | 69% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 25/33 | 25/42 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 60% |
| 2nd pts | 7/15 | 6/21 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 29% |
Gracheva blasted 2 aces . Trevisan didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Gracheva won 76% points on her first serve. She quite strong on her second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Trevisan won 60% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 29% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gracheva | Trevisan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 7 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 7/12 |
| % Converted | 71% | 58% |
| Conceded | 2 | 8 |
| Saved | 2 | 2 |
| % Saved | 100% | 25% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 6 |
Varvara broke her opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Varvara extremely effective on her serve as she has never surrendered a single service game after saving 2 break points. Martina broke her opponent 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. The Italian conceded her serve 6 times and she saved 25% of the break points that she conceded.
| Gracheva | |||
| Q1 Paoletti |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 54-26 | 54-26 | |
| Total points | 80 | 80 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 33/48 | 33/48 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 25/33 | 25/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/15 | 7/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | -100 | |
| Trevisan | |||
| Q1 Gatto-Monticone |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 75-69 | 75-69 | |
| Total points | 144 | 144 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 42/63 | 42/63 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 25/42 | 25/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 60% | 60% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/21 | 6/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 29% | 29% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/12 | 7/12 | |
| Converted % | 58% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 2/8 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 500 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLWWWL
LWWLLLLLWW Tennis Scores in Palermo
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Leonie KungKung (4-6 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Dalila SpiteriSpiteri (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Oceane DodinDodin – Federica BilardoBilardo (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Matilde PaolettiPaoletti (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Anastasiya KomardinaKomardina (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Reka-Luca JaniJani (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Kaja JuvanJuvan – Magdalena FrechFrech (2-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Lara ArruabarrenaArruabarrena – Greetje MinnenMinnen (6-0 2-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Ysaline BonaventureBonaventure – Indy De VroomeDe Vroome (3-6 7-69 6-2) – See score progression
- Martina TrevisanTrevisan – Giulia Gatto-MonticoneGatto-Monticone (6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Liudmila SamsonovaSamsonova – Tereza MrdezaMrdeza (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Laura-Ioana PaarPaar – Bibiane SchoofsSchoofs (6-2 1-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Martina Di GiuseppeDi Giuseppe – Chloe PaquetPaquet (0-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Yanina WickmayerWickmayer – Barbara HaasHaas (0-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Martina TrevisanTrevisan (1-1) – See H2H details
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Kaja JuvanJuvan (0-0) – See H2H details
- Aliona BolsovaBolsova – Laura-Ioana AndreiAndrei (0-0) – See H2H details
- Marta KostyukKostyuk – Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova (0-1) – See H2H details
- Lara ArruabarrenaArruabarrena – Martina Di GiuseppeDi Giuseppe (1-0) – See H2H details
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich (1-0) – See H2H details
- Oceane DodinDodin – Yanina WickmayerWickmayer (1-0) – See H2H details
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Ysaline BonaventureBonaventure (0-0) – See H2H details
- Petra MarticMartic – Alison Van UytvanckVan Uytvanck (1-0) – See H2H details
- Jasmine PaoliniPaolini – Darya KasatkinaKasatkina (1-2) – See H2H details
- Anett KontaveitKontaveit – Patricia Maria TigMaria Tig (1-1) – See H2H details
- Laura SiegemundSiegemund – Irina-Camelia BeguBegu (2-1) – See H2H details
- Polona HercogHercog – Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto (1-0) – See H2H details
- Arantxa RusRus – Donna VekicVekic (0-1) – See H2H details
- Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova – Kristina MladenovicMladenovic (1-0) – See H2H details
- Sara ErraniErrani – Sorana CirsteaCirstea (5-2) – See H2H details
- Kristyna PliskovaPliskova – Maria SakkariSakkari (0-1) – See H2H details
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo (0-0) – See H2H details
- Camila GiorgiGiorgi – Rebecca PetersonPeterson (1-1) – See H2H details
