Kimmer Coppejans and Elias Ymer will face off in the 3rd round of the Nur-Sultan Challenger for the 3rd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 5:00 pm on COURT 3. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and who is the favorite
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Elias Ymer that should win in 3 sets.
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded) To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Prediction and head to head Kimmer Coppejans vs. Elias Ymer
This will be the 3rd time that Kimmer Coppejans and Elias Ymer fight against each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Coppejans and Ymer (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they squared off, Coppejans won 3-6 6-0 6-3 in the 1st round in the Turin Challenger back in 2015.
Ranked no. 154, Coppejans reached the 1st round after beating Lukas Klein 3-6 6-4 6-1.
In the 2nd round against Klein, Kimmer recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 6-1). During the match Coppejans scored 79 points vs Klein’s 71. Coppejans was extremely aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about serving, Coppejans scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Kimmer Coppejans lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Coppejans put 70% of his first serves in, winning 63% (36/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (14/25) on the 2nd serve. Coppejans broke Klein 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Coppejans has a negative win-loss record in the last 10 years having won only 34% of his matches (67-128). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2020. . Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Coppejans has a 337-223 record in the last 10 years on indoor hard courts.
The Belgian’s best result of the season was getting to the semi-finals in the Launceston Challenger.
The Belgian has a 7-7 win-loss record in 2020, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the The Nur-Sultan Challenger
Kimmer didn’t play in the The Nur-Sultan Challenger in 2019.
Ranked no. 206, Ymer got to the 1st round after beating Szymon Walkow 6-1 7-67.
In the 2nd round, Ymer had a good straight sets win against Walkow (6-1 7-67). During the match Ymer scored 73 points vs Walkow’s 61. Ymer was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Ymer blasted 6 aces and he was extremely solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Elias Ymer was extremely effective on serve to win 72% (34/47) of his 1st serve and 55% (18/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Elias broke Walkow 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Ymer has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 58% of his matches (291-207). 1-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ymer has a 253-195 record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
Elias has a 1-2 win-loss record in 2020, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the The Nur-Sultan Challenger
Elias didn’t compete in the The Nur-Sultan Challenger in 2019.
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Both Coppejans and Ymer played 1 matche. At the moment, Kimmer Coppejans dropped 1 set while Elias Ymer hasn’t lost a set so far. Coppejans has played 1 sets more than Ymer (3 vs 2). Therefore, Coppejans played 6 games more than Ymer. Kimmer scored 36 winners (46% on total points). On the other side, Ymer blasted 34 winners (47%).
|Avg per match||1||6|
Coppejans blasted 1 ace . Ymer also blasted 6 aces . Coppejans won 63% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Ymer won 72% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
The Belgian broke his opponent 5 times with 56% conversion rate. The Belgian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. Elias broke his opponent 3 times with 60% conversion rate. The Swede conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
|Score||3-6 6-4 6-1|
|% 1st in||70%||70%|
|% 1st pts||63%||63%|
|% 2nd pts||56%||56%|
|% 1st in||59%||59%|
|% 1st pts||72%||72%|
|% 2nd pts||55%||55%|
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Sultan Challenger
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Robin HaaseHaase (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (w/o) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Lukas KleinKlein (3-6 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Mohamed SafwatSafwat – Grigoriy LomakinLomakin (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Sanjar FayzievFayziev (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Szymon WalkowWalkow (6-1 7-67) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Arthur De GreefDe Greef – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (4-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Simon FreundFreund (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Alexey ZakharovZakharov – Yannick MadenMaden (w/o) – See score progression
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Aleksandr NedovesovNedovesov (w/o) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Tobias KamkeKamke (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-1 7-67) – See score progression
- Pavel KotovKotov – Dmitry PopkoPopko (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Nenad ZimonjicZimonjic – (0-0) – See H2H details
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Alexey ZakharovZakharov (0-0) – See H2H details
- Mohamed SafwatSafwat – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (0-0) – See H2H details
- Arthur De GreefDe Greef – Aslan KaratsevKaratsev (0-0) – See H2H details
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Pavel KotovKotov (0-0) – See H2H details
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Jesper De JongDe Jong (0-0) – See H2H details
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (0-0) – See H2H details
- Elias YmerYmer – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (1-1) – See H2H details
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (0-0) – See H2H details