Kimmer Coppejans and Elias Ymer will face off in the 3rd round of the Nur-Sultan Challenger for the 3rd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 5:00 pm on COURT 3. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.

Prediction, odds and who is the favorite

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Elias Ymer that should win in 3 sets.

See updated oddsRegarding the initial odds of bet365, Elias Ymer is the pick to win this match.
Elias Ymer -> 1.83
Kimmer Coppejans -> 1.83

 

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded) To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Prediction and head to head Kimmer Coppejans vs. Elias Ymer

This will be the 3rd time that Kimmer Coppejans and Elias Ymer fight against each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Coppejans and Ymer (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.

The last time that they squared off, Coppejans won 3-6 6-0 6-3 in the 1st round in the Turin Challenger back in 2015.

Kimmer Coppejans

Ranked no. 154, Coppejans reached the 1st round after beating Lukas Klein 3-6 6-4 6-1.

In the 2nd round against Klein, Kimmer recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 6-1). During the match Coppejans scored 79 points vs Klein’s 71. Coppejans was extremely aggressive to blast 36 winners.

Talking about serving, Coppejans scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Kimmer Coppejans lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Coppejans put 70% of his first serves in, winning 63% (36/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (14/25) on the 2nd serve. Coppejans broke Klein 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).

Coppejans has a negative win-loss record in the last 10 years having won only 34% of his matches (67-128). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2020. . Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Coppejans has a 337-223 record in the last 10 years on indoor hard courts.

The Belgian’s best result of the season was getting to the semi-finals in the Launceston Challenger.

The Belgian has a 7-7 win-loss record in 2020, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).

Last year in the The Nur-Sultan Challenger

Kimmer didn’t play in the The Nur-Sultan Challenger in 2019.

Elias Ymer

Ranked no. 206, Ymer got to the 1st round after beating Szymon Walkow 6-1 7-67.

In the 2nd round, Ymer had a good straight sets win against Walkow (6-1 7-67). During the match Ymer scored 73 points vs Walkow’s 61. Ymer was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.

Talking about serving, Ymer blasted 6 aces and he was extremely solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Elias Ymer was extremely effective on serve to win 72% (34/47) of his 1st serve and 55% (18/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Elias broke Walkow 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).

Ymer has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 58% of his matches (291-207). 1-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ymer has a 253-195 record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.

Elias has a 1-2 win-loss record in 2020, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).

Last year in the The Nur-Sultan Challenger

Elias didn’t compete in the The Nur-Sultan Challenger in 2019.

Live score

Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts

1st
Coppejans
Ymer
7-6
7
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
4
5
3
5
3
4
3
3
3
2
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
0
2nd
Coppejans
Ymer
1-6
1
6
1
5
0
5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
3rd
Coppejans
Ymer
6-2
6
2
5
2
4
2
4
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
3rd
Coppejans 6-2
Coppejans
Ymer
6
2
5
2
4
2
4
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
Serves
CoppejansYmer
6
2
15
0
30
0
40
0
40
15
CoppejansYmer
5
2
15
0
30
0
30
15
40
15
CoppejansYmer
4
2
0
15
0
30
0
40
CoppejansYmer
4
1
0
15
0
30
15
30
30
30
40
30
40
40
40
A
40
40
A
40
40
40
40
A
40
40
40
A
40
40
40
A
CoppejansYmer
4
0
0
15
15
15
30
15
40
15
40
30
CoppejansYmer
3
0
0
15
15
15
30
15
40
15
CoppejansYmer
2
0
0
15
0
30
15
30
30
30
30
40
40
40
A
40
CoppejansYmer
1
0
0
15
0
30
15
30
30
30
40
30
2nd
Ymer 6-1
Coppejans
Ymer
1
6
1
5
0
5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
Serves
CoppejansYmer
1
6
0
15
15
15
15
30
30
30
30
40
CoppejansYmer
1
5
15
0
15
15
30
15
40
15
CoppejansYmer
0
5
15
0
15
15
15
30
15
40
30
40
CoppejansYmer
0
4
0
15
0
30
0
40
CoppejansYmer
0
3
15
0
15
15
15
30
15
40
30
40
CoppejansYmer
0
2
15
0
30
30
30
40
CoppejansYmer
0
1
0
15
0
30
0
40
1st
Coppejans 7-6
Coppejans
Ymer
7
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
4
5
3
5
3
4
3
3
3
2
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
0
Serves
CoppejansYmer
7
6
1
0
2
0
2
1
2
2
3
2
4
2
5
2
6
2
6
3
6
4
CoppejansYmer
6
6
0
15
0
30
0
40
15
40
CoppejansYmer
6
5
15
0
30
0
40
0
CoppejansYmer
5
5
0
15
15
15
30
15
30
30
40
30
40
40
A
40
CoppejansYmer
4
5
15
0
15
15
30
15
30
30
40
30
CoppejansYmer
3
5
0
15
0
30
15
30
15
40
CoppejansYmer
3
4
0
15
0
30
0
40
15
40
CoppejansYmer
3
3
0
15
0
30
0
40
CoppejansYmer
3
2
15
0
30
0
30
15
30
30
30
40
CoppejansYmer
3
1
0
15
15
15
30
15
40
15
40
30
CoppejansYmer
2
1
15
0
30
0
30
15
30
30
30
40
40
40
A
40
CoppejansYmer
1
1
0
15
0
30
15
30
15
40
CoppejansYmer
1
0
15
0
30
0
40
0
40
15

H2H Performance in the tournament

Matches, sets, games and points

Points Coppejans Ymer
Match played 1 1
Tot Set 3 2
Tot Games 26 20
Pts 79-71 73-61
Total Points 150 134
Winners 36 34
%Winners 46% 47%

Both Coppejans and Ymer played 1 matche. At the moment, Kimmer Coppejans dropped 1 set while Elias Ymer hasn’t lost a set so far. Coppejans has played 1 sets more than Ymer (3 vs 2). Therefore, Coppejans played 6 games more than Ymer. Kimmer scored 36 winners (46% on total points). On the other side, Ymer blasted 34 winners (47%).

Serve Performance

Serve Coppejans Ymer
Aces 1 6
Avg per match 1 6
1st in 57/82 47/80
%1st in 70% 59%
1st pts 36/57 34/47
%1st pts 63% 72%
2nd pts 14/25 18/33
%2nd pts 56% 55%

Coppejans blasted 1 ace . Ymer also blasted 6 aces . Coppejans won 63% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Ymer won 72% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks Coppejans Ymer
Won 5 3
Converted 5/9 3/5
% Converted 56% 60%
Conceded 8 6
Saved 5 5
% Saved 63% 83%
Times Broken 3 1

The Belgian broke his opponent 5 times with 56% conversion rate. The Belgian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. Elias broke his opponent 3 times with 60% conversion rate. The Swede conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.

Coppejans
R2
Klein
Total
Score 3-6 6-4 6-1
Tot Set 3 3
Tot Games 26 26
pts 79-71 79-71
Total points 150 150
Winners 36 36
%Winners 46% 46%
SERVE
Aces 1 1
Double Faults 2 2
1st in 57/82 57/82
% 1st in 70% 70%
1st pts 36/57 36/57
% 1st pts 63% 63%
2nd pts 14/25 14/25
% 2nd pts 56% 56%
Breaks
Won 5 5
Converted 5/9 5/9
Converted % 56% 56%
Conceded 8 8
Saved 5/8 5
Saved % 63% 63%
Times Broken 3 200
Ymer
R2
Walkow
Total
Score 6-1 7-67
Tot Set 2 2
Tot Games 20 20
pts 73-61 73-61
Total points 134 134
Winners 34 34
%Winners 47% 47%
SERVE
Aces 6 6
Double Faults 0 0
1st in 47/80 47/80
% 1st in 59% 59%
1st pts 34/47 34/47
% 1st pts 72% 72%
2nd pts 18/33 18/33
% 2nd pts 55% 55%
Breaks
Won 3 3
Converted 3/5 3/5
Converted % 60% 60%
Conceded 6 6
Saved 5/6 5
Saved % 83% 83%
Times Broken 1 0

Head 2 Head

Win Loss
Coppejans
WWLLLLWWWL
Ymer
LWLL
2020 2019 2018
8 - 5
1 - 2
6-5
Hard
0-1
2-0
I Hard
1-1

Tennis Scores in Sultan Challenger

Upcoming matches

  • Nenad ZimonjicZimonjic (0-0) – See H2H details
  • Illya MarchenkoMarchenkoAlexey ZakharovZakharov (0-0) – See H2H details
  • Mohamed SafwatSafwatTallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (0-0) – See H2H details
  • Arthur De GreefDe GreefAslan KaratsevKaratsev (0-0) – See H2H details
  • Mats MoraingMoraingPavel KotovKotov (0-0) – See H2H details
  • Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaardJesper De JongDe Jong (0-0) – See H2H details
  • Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De ZandschulpRoman SafiullinSafiullin (0-0) – See H2H details
  • Elias YmerYmerKimmer CoppejansCoppejans (1-1) – See H2H details
  • Jurij RodionovRodionovBernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (0-0) – See H2H details