H2H. Mohamed Safwat vs Tallon Griekspoor | Nur-Sultan Challenger prediction, odds, preview, pick

Nur-Sultan Challenger. Safwat and Griekspoor will play each other in 3rd round of the Nur-Sultan Challenger. See the H2H stats, odds, preview and predictions of their next match

Prediction and head to head Mohamed Safwat vs. Tallon Griekspoor

Mohamed Safwat and Tallon Griekspoor will fight against each other in the 3rd round of the Nur-Sultan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 2:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.

Prediction, odds and who is the favorite

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tallon Griekspoor that should win in 3 sets.

See updated oddsRegarding the initial odds of bet365, Tallon Griekspoor is the pick to win this match.
Tallon Griekspoor -> 1.83
Mohamed Safwat -> 1.83

 

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded) To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Prediction and head to head Mohamed Safwat vs. Tallon Griekspoor

There is no head to head record between Mohamed Safwat and Tallon Griekspoor since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.

Mohamed Safwat

Ranked no. 131, the Egyptian reached the 3rd round after beating Grigoriy Lomakin 6-2 6-4.

In the 2nd round, The Egyptian had a good straight sets win against Lomakin (6-2 6-4). During the match Safwat scored 60 points vs Lomakin’s 47. The Egyptian was extremely aggressive to blast 22 winners.

Talking about serving, Safwat couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Mohamed Safwat was extremely effective on serve to win 79% (22/28) of his 1st serve and 65% (17/26) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Safwat broke Lomakin 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).

Safwat has a losing record in the last 9 years having won 47% of his matches (119-105). 2-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Safwat has a 402-243 record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.

Safwat’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Launceston Challenger.

Safwat has a 13-6 win-loss record in 2020, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).

Last year in the The Nur-Sultan Challenger

The Egyptian didn’t play in the The Nur-Sultan Challenger in 2019.

Tallon Griekspoor

Ranked no. 199, the Dutch got to the 3rd round after beating Nino Serdarusic 6-3 7-65.

In the 2nd round, Griekspoor had a good straight sets win against Serdarusic (6-3 7-65). During the match Griekspoor scored 79 points vs Serdarusic’s 65. The Dutch was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.

Talking about serving, Griekspoor blasted 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Tallon Griekspoor was extremely effective on serve to win 85% (35/41) of his 1st serve and 63% (15/24) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Tallon broke Serdarusic once after converting 17% of his break points (1/6).

Griekspoor has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 51% of his matches (95-90). 2-3 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Griekspoor has a 203-120 win-loss record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.

The Dutch has a 5-4 win-loss record in 2020, 2-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).

Last year in the The Nur-Sultan Challenger

The Dutch didn’t play in the The Nur-Sultan Challenger in 2019.

Live score

Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts

1st
Safwat
Griekspoor
1-6
1
6
1
5
1
4
1
3
1
2
1
1
0
1
2nd
Safwat
Griekspoor
6-7
6
7
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
2nd
Griekspoor 7-6
Safwat
Griekspoor
6
7
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
Serves
SafwatGriekspoor
6
7
1
0
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
2
4
2
4
3
4
4
5
4
6
4
6
5
6
6
7
6
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
9
SafwatGriekspoor
6
6
0
15
0
30
0
40
SafwatGriekspoor
6
5
0
15
0
30
0
40
15
40
30
40
40
40
A
40
SafwatGriekspoor
5
5
0
15
0
30
0
40
SafwatGriekspoor
5
4
15
0
30
0
40
0
SafwatGriekspoor
4
4
0
15
0
30
0
40
SafwatGriekspoor
4
3
0
15
15
15
30
15
30
30
40
30
SafwatGriekspoor
3
3
15
0
30
0
30
15
30
30
30
40
SafwatGriekspoor
3
2
15
0
30
0
30
15
40
15
SafwatGriekspoor
2
2
15
0
15
15
30
15
30
30
40
30
40
40
A
40
40
40
40
A
SafwatGriekspoor
2
1
0
15
0
30
15
30
15
40
30
40
40
40
A
40
SafwatGriekspoor
1
1
15
0
15
15
15
30
15
40
30
40
SafwatGriekspoor
1
0
0
15
15
15
30
15
30
30
40
30
1st
Griekspoor 6-1
Safwat
Griekspoor
1
6
1
5
1
4
1
3
1
2
1
1
0
1
Serves
SafwatGriekspoor
1
6
15
0
15
15
15
30
30
30
40
30
40
40
A
40
40
40
A
40
40
40
40
A
SafwatGriekspoor
1
5
15
0
30
0
30
15
40
15
40
30
40
40
40
A
SafwatGriekspoor
1
4
0
15
0
30
15
30
15
40
30
40
40
40
40
A
SafwatGriekspoor
1
3
15
0
15
15
15
30
30
30
30
40
SafwatGriekspoor
1
2
15
0
15
15
15
30
15
40
SafwatGriekspoor
1
1
15
0
30
0
40
0
SafwatGriekspoor
0
1
0
15
15
15
15
30
15
40

H2H Performance in the tournament

Matches, sets, games and points

Points Safwat Griekspoor
Match played 1 1
Tot Set 2 2
Tot Games 18 22
Pts 60-47 79-65
Total Points 107 144
Winners 22 35
%Winners 37% 44%

Both Safwat and Griekspoor played 1 matche. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Safwat and Griekspoor have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Safwat played 4 games less than Griekspoor. The Egyptian scored 22 winners (37% on total points). On the other side, Griekspoor blasted 35 winners (44%).

Serve Performance

Serve Safwat Griekspoor
Aces 0 7
Avg per match 0 7
1st in 28/54 41/65
%1st in 52% 63%
1st pts 22/28 35/41
%1st pts 79% 85%
2nd pts 17/26 15/24
%2nd pts 65% 63%

Safwat didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Griekspoor blasted 7 aces . Safwat won 79% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Griekspoor won 85% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks Safwat Griekspoor
Won 3 1
Converted 3/4 1/6
% Converted 75% 17%
Conceded 0 0
Saved 0 0
% Saved NAN% NAN%
Times Broken 0 0

Safwat broke his opponent 3 times with 75% conversion rate. Mohamed was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. Griekspoor broke his opponent once with 17% conversion rate. Griekspoor was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.

Safwat
R2
Lomakin
Total
Score 6-2 6-4
Tot Set 2 2
Tot Games 18 18
pts 60-47 60-47
Total points 107 107
Winners 22 22
%Winners 37% 37%
SERVE
Aces 0 0
Double Faults 1 1
1st in 28/54 28/54
% 1st in 52% 52%
1st pts 22/28 22/28
% 1st pts 79% 79%
2nd pts 17/26 17/26
% 2nd pts 65% 65%
Breaks
Won 3 3
Converted 3/4 3/4
Converted % 75% 75%
Conceded 0 0
Saved 0/0 0
Saved % 0%
Times Broken 0 -100
Griekspoor
R2
Serdarusic
Total
Score 6-3 7-65
Tot Set 2 2
Tot Games 22 22
pts 79-65 79-65
Total points 144 144
Winners 35 35
%Winners 44% 44%
SERVE
Aces 7 7
Double Faults 3 3
1st in 41/65 41/65
% 1st in 63% 63%
1st pts 35/41 35/41
% 1st pts 85% 85%
2nd pts 15/24 15/24
% 2nd pts 63% 63%
Breaks
Won 1 1
Converted 1/6 1/6
Converted % 17% 17%
Conceded 0 0
Saved 0/0 0
Saved % 0%
Times Broken 0 -100

Head 2 Head

Win Loss
Safwat
LWLWLLWWWW
Griekspoor
WWLLWLLWWW
2020 2019 2018
12 - 6
6 - 3
11-5
Hard
3-1
1-1
I Hard
3-2

Tennis Scores in Sultan Challenger

Upcoming matches

  • Nenad ZimonjicZimonjic (0-0) – See H2H details
  • Illya MarchenkoMarchenkoAlexey ZakharovZakharov (0-0) – See H2H details
  • Mohamed SafwatSafwatTallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (0-0) – See H2H details
  • Arthur De GreefDe GreefAslan KaratsevKaratsev (0-0) – See H2H details
  • Mats MoraingMoraingPavel KotovKotov (0-0) – See H2H details
  • Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaardJesper De JongDe Jong (0-0) – See H2H details
  • Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De ZandschulpRoman SafiullinSafiullin (0-0) – See H2H details
  • Elias YmerYmerKimmer CoppejansCoppejans (1-1) – See H2H details
  • Jurij RodionovRodionovBernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (0-0) – See H2H details