Jeff Wolf and Mikael Torpegaard will square off in the semifinal of the Columbus Challenger for the 4th time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 5:00 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jeff Wolf who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jeff Wolf is the pick to win this match.
Jeff Wolf -> 1.66
Mikael Torpegaard -> 2.10
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jeff Wolf vs. Mikael Torpegaard
This will be the 4th time that Jeff Wolf and Mikael Torpegaard square off. The head to head is 2-1 for Torpegaard (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played, Torpegaard won 6-1 6-4 in the 2nd round in the Columbus Challenger back in 2018.
Jeff Wolf
Ranked no. 163 (career high), the American got to the 2nd round after defeating James Ward 6-75 6-3 6-4, Roberto Quiroz 6-2 4-6 6-2 and Cedrik-Marcel Stebe 5-7 7-64 6-3.
In the quarter against Stebe, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 7-64 6-3).-103) than Stebe. In fact, the world no. 163 won 103 points vs Stebe’s. That means that Wolf was more focused during the important points. Wolf was extremely aggressive to blast 52 winners.
Talking about serving, Wolf blasted 9 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Jeff Wolf lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Wolf put 61% of his first serves in, winning 76% (52/68) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (18/43) on the 2nd serve. Jeff was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Stebe 3 times.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Wolf has conceded 3 set in this tournament to conquer 53% of the points he played.
Wolf has a losing win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 40% of his matches (43-29). 6-2 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Wolf has a 33-24 win-loss record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
Jeff’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Noumea Challenger.
Wolf has a 13-3 win-loss record in 2020, 6-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Columbus Challenger
Wolf lost in the final 6-3 7-64 to Peter Polansky.
Mikael Torpegaard
Ranked no. 176, the Dane reached the 2nd round after defeating Kevin King 6-75 6-4 6-4, Zhe Li 7-62 4-6 6-4 and Marc Polmans 7-5 7-62.
In the quarter, The Dane had a good straight sets win against Polmans (7-5 7-62). During the match Torpegaard scored 82 points vs Polmans’s 66. Torpegaard was extremely aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about serving, Torpegaard blasted 7 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Mikael Torpegaard lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Torpegaard put 66% of his first serves in, winning 86% (36/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (10/22) on the 2nd serve. Mikael broke Polmans 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Mikael has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
Torpegaard has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 72% of his matches (237-93). 8-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Torpegaard has a 102-54 win-loss record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
The Dane’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Cleveland Challenger.
The Dane has a 8-3 win-loss record in 2020, 8-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Columbus Challenger
Torpegaard didn’t play in the Columbus Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Wolf | Torpegaard |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 92 | 91 |
| Pts | 299-260 | 303-276 |
| Total Points | 559 | 579 |
| Winners | 124 | 131 |
| %Winners | 41% | 43% |
Both Wolf and Torpegaard played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Jeff Wolf conceded 3 sets, while Mikael Torpegaard dropper 2 sets. Wolf has played 1 sets more than Torpegaard (9 vs 8). Therefore, Wolf played 1 games more than Torpegaard. Wolf scored 124 winners (41% on total points). On the other side, The Dane blasted 131 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Wolf | Torpegaard |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 42 | 22 |
| Avg per match | 14 | 7.3 |
| 1st in | 149/264 | 174/286 |
| %1st in | 56% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 124/149 | 131/174 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 63/115 | 60/112 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 54% |
Wolf blasted 42 aces (14 per match). Torpegaard blasted 22 aces (7.3 per match). Wolf won 83% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Torpegaard won 75% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Wolf | Torpegaard |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 9 |
| Converted | 10/24 | 9/23 |
| % Converted | 42% | 39% |
| Conceded | 13 | 18 |
| Saved | 9 | 12 |
| % Saved | 69% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 6 |
Wolf broke his opponents 10 times with 42% conversion rate. Wolf conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded. Mikael broke his opponents 9 times with 39% conversion rate. Torpegaard conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Wolf | |||||
| R2 Ward |
R3 Quiroz |
1/4 Stebe |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-75 6-3 6-4 | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | 5-7 7-64 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 26 | 34 | 92 | |
| pts | 102-82 | 94-73 | 103-105 | 299-260 | |
| Total points | 184 | 167 | 208 | 559 | |
| Winners | 42 | 30 | 52 | 124 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 32% | 50% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 26 | 7 | 9 | 42 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 3 | 5 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 46/88 | 35/65 | 68/111 | 149/264 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 54% | 61% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 42/46 | 30/35 | 52/68 | 124/149 | |
| % 1st pts | 91% | 86% | 76% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/42 | 20/30 | 18/43 | 63/115 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 67% | 42% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 3 | 10 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 4/16 | 3/3 | 10/24 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 25% | 100% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 2 | 7 | 13 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 1/2 | 5/7 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 50% | 71% | 65% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | 33 | |
| Torpegaard | |||||
| R2 King |
R3 Li |
1/4 Polmans |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-75 6-4 6-4 | 7-62 4-6 6-4 | 7-5 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | 25 | 91 | |
| pts | 116-109 | 105-101 | 82-66 | 303-276 | |
| Total points | 225 | 206 | 148 | 579 | |
| Winners | 43 | 52 | 36 | 131 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 50% | 44% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 12 | 7 | 22 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | 4 | 14 | |
| 1st in | 63/111 | 69/111 | 42/64 | 174/286 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 62% | 66% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 43/63 | 52/69 | 36/42 | 131/174 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 75% | 86% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 33/48 | 17/42 | 10/22 | 60/112 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 40% | 45% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 3 | 9 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 4/8 | 3/9 | 9/23 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 50% | 33% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 9 | 2 | 18 | |
| Saved | 7/7 | 5/9 | 0/2 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 56% | 0% | 52% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 | 2 | 100 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLWLLLL
Tennis Scores in Columbus Challenger
- Denis IstominIstomin – Aleksandar VukicVukic (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Marc PolmansPolmans (7-5 7-62) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Kaichi UchidaUchida (7-65 7-63) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (5-7 7-64 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Denis IstominIstomin (0-0) – See H2H details
- Jeff WolfWolf – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (1-2) – See H2H details
