Cedrik-Marcel Stebe and Jeff Wolf will clash against each other in the quarter of the Columbus Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 4:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jeff Wolf who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jeff Wolf is the pick to win this match.
Jeff Wolf -> 1.72
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe -> 2.00
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Cedrik-Marcel Stebe vs. Jeff Wolf
There is no head to head record between Cedrik-Marcel Stebe and Jeff Wolf since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
Ranked no. 138, the German got to the quarter after beating Matija Pecotic 6-4 7-67 and Johannes Haerteis 6-4 6-1.
In the 3rd round, The German had a good straight sets win against Haerteis (6-4 6-1). During the match Stebe scored 63 points vs Haerteis’s 40. Stebe was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Stebe blasted 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Cedrik-Marcel Stebe was extremely effective on serve to win 80% (28/35) of his 1st serve and 56% (10/18) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The German was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Haerteis 4 times.
Overall Performance in this tournament
The German hasn’t lost yet a set in this event to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Stebe has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (176-106). 2-0 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Stebe has a 186-118 record in the last 10 years on indoor hard courts.
Cedrik-Marcel’s best result of the year was getting to the semi-finals in the Noumea Challenger.
Stebe has a 7-4 win-loss record in 2020, 2-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Columbus Challenger
Stebe didn’t play in the Columbus Challenger in 2019.
Jeff Wolf
Ranked no. 163 (career high), Jeff got to the quarter after defeating James Ward 6-75 6-3 6-4 and Roberto Quiroz 6-2 4-6 6-2.
In the 3rd round, Jeff defeated Quiroz (6-2 4-6 6-2). During the match Wolf scored 94 points vs Quiroz’s 73. Wolf was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Wolf blasted 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Jeff Wolf was extremely effective on serve to win 86% (30/35) of his 1st serve and 67% (20/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Quiroz 4 times after converting 25% of his break points (4/16).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jeff has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Wolf has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 56% of his matches (37-29). 5-2 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Wolf has a 32-24 win-loss record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
The American’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Noumea Challenger.
The American has a 12-3 win-loss record in 2020, 5-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Columbus Challenger
Wolf lost in the final 6-3 7-64 to Peter Polansky.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Stebe | Wolf |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 4 | 6 |
Tot Games | 40 | 58 |
Pts | 149-119 | 196-155 |
Total Points | 268 | 351 |
Winners | 55 | 72 |
%Winners | 37% | 37% |
Both Stebe and Wolf played 2 matches. At the moment, Jeff Wolf dropped 2 sets while Cedrik-Marcel Stebe hasn’t dropped a set so far. Stebe has played 2 sets less than Wolf (4 vs 6). Therefore, Stebe played 18 games less than Wolf. Stebe scored 55 winners (37% on total points). On the other side, Jeff blasted 72 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Stebe | Wolf |
---|---|---|
Aces | 6 | 33 |
Avg per match | 3 | 16.5 |
1st in | 83/141 | 81/153 |
%1st in | 59% | 53% |
1st pts | 55/83 | 72/81 |
%1st pts | 66% | 89% |
2nd pts | 34/58 | 45/72 |
%2nd pts | 59% | 63% |
Stebe blasted 6 aces (3 per match). Wolf blasted 33 aces (16.5 per match). Stebe won 66% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Wolf won 89% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Stebe | Wolf |
---|---|---|
Won | 9 | 7 |
Converted | 9/14 | 7/21 |
% Converted | 64% | 33% |
Conceded | 17 | 6 |
Saved | 12 | 4 |
% Saved | 71% | 67% |
Times Broken | 5 | 2 |
The German broke his opponents 9 times with 64% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 7 times with 33% conversion rate. Wolf conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Stebe | ||||
R2 Pecotic |
R3 Haerteis |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 7-67 | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 17 | 40 | |
pts | 86-79 | 63-40 | 149-119 | |
Total points | 165 | 103 | 268 | |
Winners | 27 | 28 | 55 | |
%Winners | 31% | 44% | 37% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
1st in | 48/88 | 35/53 | 83/141 | |
% 1st in | 55% | 66% | 59% | |
1st pts | 27/48 | 28/35 | 55/83 | |
% 1st pts | 56% | 80% | 66% | |
2nd pts | 24/40 | 10/18 | 34/58 | |
% 2nd pts | 60% | 56% | 59% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
Converted | 5/10 | 4/4 | 9/14 | |
Converted % | 50% | 100% | 64% | |
Conceded | 12 | 5 | 17 | |
Saved | 8/12 | 4/5 | 12 | |
Saved % | 67% | 80% | 74% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 1 | 150 |
Wolf | ||||
R2 Ward |
R3 Quiroz |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-75 6-3 6-4 | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 32 | 26 | 58 | |
pts | 102-82 | 94-73 | 196-155 | |
Total points | 184 | 167 | 351 | |
Winners | 42 | 30 | 72 | |
%Winners | 41% | 32% | 37% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 26 | 7 | 33 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
1st in | 46/88 | 35/65 | 81/153 | |
% 1st in | 52% | 54% | 53% | |
1st pts | 42/46 | 30/35 | 72/81 | |
% 1st pts | 91% | 86% | 89% | |
2nd pts | 25/42 | 20/30 | 45/72 | |
% 2nd pts | 60% | 67% | 63% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
Converted | 3/5 | 4/16 | 7/21 | |
Converted % | 60% | 25% | 33% | |
Conceded | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
Saved | 3/4 | 1/2 | 4 | |
Saved % | 75% | 50% | 63% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Columbus Challenger
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Emilio GomezGomez (7-64 3-6 7-66) – See score progression
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (6-4 1-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Zhe LiLi (7-62 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Johannes HaerteisHaerteis (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (6-2 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Denis IstominIstomin – Guilherme ClezarClezar (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (6-74 7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Zhe LiLi (7-6(2) 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Marc PolmansPolmans (0-0) – See H2H details
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Denis IstominIstomin (0-0) – See H2H details
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Kaichi UchidaUchida (0-0) – See H2H details
- Jeff WolfWolf – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (0-0) – See H2H details