Lukas Lacko and Quentin Halys will fight against each other in the 3rd round of the Pau Challenger for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:00 pm on CENTRAL. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Quentin Halys who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Quentin Halys is the pick to win this match.
Quentin Halys -> 1.80
Lukas Lacko -> 1.90
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Lukas Lacko vs. Quentin Halys
This will be the 2nd time that Lukas Lacko and Quentin Halys square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Lacko (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they squared off, Lacko won 6-2 6-2 in the 2nd round in the Budapest Challenger back in 2016.
Lukas Lacko
Ranked no. 168, Lukas reached the 2nd round after beating Sasi Kumar Mukund 6-4 7-63.
In the 2nd round, The Slovakian had a good straight sets win against Kumar Mukund (6-4 7-63). During the match Lacko scored 69 points vs Kumar Mukund’s 61. Lukas was extremely aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about serving, Lacko blasted 12 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Lukas Lacko was extremely effective on serve to win 88% (37/42) of his 1st serve and 63% (12/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Lacko broke Kumar Mukund once after converting 25% of his break points (1/4).
Lacko has a favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (386-333). 4-4 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Lacko has a 310-248 record in the last 10 years on indoor hard courts.
Lukas’s best result of the year was getting to the semi-finals in the Quimper Challenger.
Lacko has a 4-5 win-loss record in 2020, 4-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Pau Challenger
The Slovakian didn’t compete in the Pau Challenger in 2019.
Quentin Halys
Ranked no. 193, the French Player got to the 2nd round after beating Matteo Viola 6-1 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Quentin had a good straight sets win against Viola (6-1 6-2). During the match Halys scored 54 points vs Viola’s 28. The French Player was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Halys blasted 7 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Quentin Halys lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Halys put 68% of his first serves in, winning 83% (25/30) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (6/14) on the 2nd serve. The French Player broke Viola 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Halys has a negative win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 49% of his matches (240-247). 4-4 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Halys has a 157-142 win-loss record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
Halys has a 7-6 win-loss record in 2020, 4-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Pau Challenger
Quentin lost in the quarter 6-4 6-4 to Steve Darcis.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lacko | Halys |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 15 |
| Pts | 69-61 | 54-28 |
| Total Points | 130 | 82 |
| Winners | 37 | 25 |
| %Winners | 54% | 46% |
Both Lacko and Halys played 1 matche. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Lacko and Halys have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Lacko played 8 games more than Halys. Lukas scored 37 winners (54% on total points). On the other side, Halys blasted 25 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lacko | Halys |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 12 | 7 |
| 1st in | 42/61 | 30/44 |
| %1st in | 69% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 37/42 | 25/30 |
| %1st pts | 88% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 6/14 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 43% |
Lacko blasted 12 aces . Halys blasted 7 aces . Lacko won 88% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Halys won 83% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lacko | Halys |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 1 | 5 |
| Converted | 1/4 | 5/6 |
| % Converted | 25% | 83% |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | NAN% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The Slovakian broke his opponent once with 25% conversion rate. Lacko was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. Halys broke his opponent 5 times with 83% conversion rate. The French Player conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lacko | |||
| R2 Kumar Mukund |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 69-61 | 69-61 | |
| Total points | 130 | 130 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 54% | 54% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 42/61 | 42/61 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 37/42 | 37/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 12/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/4 | 1/4 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | -100 | |
| Halys | |||
| R2 Viola |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 54-28 | 54-28 | |
| Total points | 82 | 82 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 30/44 | 30/44 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 25/30 | 25/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/14 | 6/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWLWWLW Tennis Scores in Pau Challenger
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (7-65 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Elliot BenchetritBenchetrit (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Fabien ReboulReboul (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Jiri VeselyVesely – Mathias BourgueBourgue (6-4 6-79 6-3) – See score progression
- Hugo GastonGaston – Yannick MadenMaden (1-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (2-6 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Ernests GulbisGulbis – Norbert GombosGombos (7-67 7-61) – See score progression
- Quentin HalysHalys – Matteo ViolaViola (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Borna GojoGojo (7-66 7-64) – See score progression
- Jerzy JanowiczJanowicz – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas LackoLacko – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Pavel KotovKotov – Antoine HoangHoang (6-4 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili – Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky (7-61 6-2) – See score progression
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Sumit NagalNagal (6-1 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Robin HaaseHaase (7-65 7-63) – See score progression
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Mats MoraingMoraing (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (1-4) – See H2H details
- Lukas LackoLacko – Quentin HalysHalys (1-0) – See H2H details
- Jerzy JanowiczJanowicz – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (0-0) – See H2H details
- Jiri VeselyVesely – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-0) – See H2H details
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Pavel KotovKotov (1-2) – See H2H details
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-0) – See H2H details
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Ernests GulbisGulbis (0-0) – See H2H details
- Harold MayotMayot – Hugo GastonGaston (0-0) – See H2H details
