Emilio Gomez and Aleksandar Vukic will clash against each other in the 3rd round of the Columbus Challenger for the 3rd time of their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Gomez who should win in 3 sets.
Emilio Gomez -> 1.66
Aleksandar Vukic -> 2.10
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Emilio Gomez vs. Aleksandar Vukic
This will be the 3rd time that Emilio Gomez and Aleksandar Vukic square off. The head to head is 2-0 for Vukic (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they locked horns, Vukic won 7-5 7-64 in the 1st round in Canberra Challenger back in January 2020.
Emilio Gomez
Ranked no. 149, Emilio reached the 1st round after beating Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace 6-4 6-0
.In the 2nd round, Emilio had a good straight sets win against Rodriguez (6-4 6-0). During the match Gomez scored 64 points vs Rodriguez’s 45. The Ecuadorian was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Gomez blasted 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Emilio Gomez conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 3 break points. Furthermore, Gomez put 55% of his first serves in, winning 91% (29/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 35% (9/26) on the 2nd serve. Gomez broke Rodriguez 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Gomez has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (135-85). 4-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gomez has a 186-154 win-loss record in the last 10 years on indoor hard courts.
Gomez’s best result of the current season was getting to the semi-finals in the Dallas Challenger.
Emilio has a 6-5 win-loss record in 2020, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Columbus Challenger
Gomez lost in the semifinal 6-2 7-65 to Jeff Wolf.
Aleksandar Vukic
Ranked no. 254, Vukic got to the 1st round after defeating Antoine Escoffier 6-3 7-66.
In the 2nd round, Vukic had a good straight sets win against Escoffier (6-3 7-66). During the match Vukic scored 71 points vs Escoffier’s 60. The Australian was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Vukic blasted 11 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Aleksandar Vukic was extremely effective on serve to win 83% (30/36) of his 1st serve and 59% (16/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Australian broke Escoffier 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Vukic has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 56% of his matches (63-50). 2-2 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Vukic has a 49-41 record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
The Australian has a 7-5 win-loss record in 2020, 2-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Columbus Challenger
Aleksandar didn’t compete in the Columbus Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Gomez | Vukic |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 16 | 22 |
Pts | 64-45 | 71-60 |
Total Points | 109 | 131 |
Winners | 29 | 30 |
%Winners | 45% | 42% |
Both Gomez and Vukic played 1 matche. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gomez and Vukic have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gomez played 6 games less than Vukic. The Ecuadorian scored 29 winners (45% on total points). On the other side, The Australian blasted 30 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Gomez | Vukic |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 11 |
Avg per match | 2 | 11 |
1st in | 32/58 | 36/63 |
%1st in | 55% | 57% |
1st pts | 29/32 | 30/36 |
%1st pts | 91% | 83% |
2nd pts | 9/26 | 16/27 |
%2nd pts | 35% | 59% |
Gomez blasted 2 aces . Vukic blasted 11 aces . Gomez won 91% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 35% of the points. On the other side, Vukic won 83% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Gomez | Vukic |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 3 |
Converted | 4/8 | 3/7 |
% Converted | 50% | 43% |
Conceded | 3 | 1 |
Saved | 3 | 0 |
% Saved | 100% | 0% |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The Ecuadorian broke his opponent 4 times with 50% conversion rate. The Ecuadorian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points. Vukic broke his opponent 3 times with 43% conversion rate. Aleksandar conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
Gomez | |||
R2 Rodriguez | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-0 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 64-45 | 64-45 | |
Total points | 109 | 109 | |
Winners | 29 | 29 | |
%Winners | 45% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 32/58 | 32/58 | |
% 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
1st pts | 29/32 | 29/32 | |
% 1st pts | 91% | 91% | |
2nd pts | 9/26 | 9/26 | |
% 2nd pts | 35% | 35% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | -100 |
Vukic | |||
R2 Escoffier | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 7-66 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
pts | 71-60 | 71-60 | |
Total points | 131 | 131 | |
Winners | 30 | 30 | |
%Winners | 42% | 42% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 11 | 11 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 36/63 | 36/63 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
1st pts | 30/36 | 30/36 | |
% 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
2nd pts | 16/27 | 16/27 | |
% 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Tennis Scores in Columbus Challenger
- Denis IstominIstomin – Alexander CozbinovCozbinov (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Kevin KingKing (6-75 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Guilherme ClezarClezar – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (2-6 7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Johannes HaerteisHaerteis – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (6-2 7-65) – See score progression
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Sekou BangouraBangoura (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Matija PecoticPecotic (6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – Lloyd GlasspoolGlasspool (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Diego HidalgoHidalgo (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Zhe LiLi – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (7-67 7-63) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (7-66 6-4) – See score progression
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Dudi SelaSela (7-5 1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (6-3 7-66) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – James WardWard (6-75 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Emilio GomezGomez – Ricardo Rodriguez-PaceRodriguez-Pace (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Peter PolanskyPolansky (4-6 6-1 7-65) – See score progression
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Andrew HarrisHarris (7-65 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Diego HidalgoHidalgo (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Denis IstominIstomin – Alexander CozbinovCozbinov (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (7-6(6) 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Emilio GomezGomez – Aleksandar VukicVukic (0-2) – See H2H details
- Guilherme ClezarClezar – Denis IstominIstomin (0-0) – See H2H details
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – Marc PolmansPolmans (0-1) – See H2H details
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Zhe LiLi (0-0) – See H2H details
- Johannes HaerteisHaerteis – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (1-0) – See H2H details
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – See H2H details
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Kaichi UchidaUchida (0-3) – See H2H details
- Jeff WolfWolf – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (0-0) – See H2H details