Xiyu Wang and Sara Errani will play each other in the 2nd round of the Abierto Mexicano TELCEL for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 6:30 pm on CANCHA 2. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sara Errani who should win in 3 sets.
Sara Errani -> 0
Xiyu Wang -> 0
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Xiyu Wang vs. Sara Errani
There is no head to head record between Xiyu Wang and Sara Errani since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Xiyu Wang
Ranked no. 127, the Chinese reached the 2nd round after beating Mayo Hibi 6-3 6-4, Anhelina Kalinina 7-60 7-5 and Yafan Wang 6-4 7-68.
In the 1st round, Wang had a good straight sets win against Wang (6-4 7-68). During the match Wang scored 75 points vs Wang’s 71. The Chinese was extremely aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Wang was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 5 double faults. Xiyu Wang lost the serve 4 times and she saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Wang put 66% of her first serves in, winning 62% (32/52) of the points behind her 1st serve and 41% (11/27) on the 2nd serve. Xiyu broke Wang 5 times after converting 63% of her break points (5/8).
Wang has a unfavourable win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 37% of her matches (238-139). 8-4 on hard in 2020. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this competition, Wang has a 92-53 record in the last 5 years on hard.
The Chinese has a 8-4 win-loss record in 2020, 8-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Acapulco
Wang didn’t play in Acapulco in 2019.
Sara Errani
Ranked no. 185, Errani got to the 2nd round after beating Stefanie Voegele 6-1 6-2, Nicole Gibbs 6-3 6-0 and Sara Sorribes Tormo 7-5 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Gibbs (6-3 6-0). During the match Errani scored 74 points vs Gibbs’s 53. Sara was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Errani was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 5 double faults. Sara Errani lost the serve twice and she saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Errani put 75% of her first serves in, winning 60% (30/50) of the points behind her 1st serve and 41% (7/17) on the 2nd serve. Errani broke Gibbs 7 times after converting 47% of her break points (7/15).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Errani hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 60% of the points she played.
Errani has a winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 57% of her matches (571-428). 4-3 on hard in 2020. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Errani has a 287-188 win-loss record in the last 10 years on hard.
The Italian has a 4-4 win-loss record in 2020, 4-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Acapulco
The Italian didn’t compete in Acapulco in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Wang | Errani |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 2 |
Tot Set | 6 | 4 |
Tot Games | 67 | 30 |
Pts | 237-198 | 131-86 |
Total Points | 435 | 217 |
Winners | 95 | 53 |
%Winners | 40% | 40% |
Wang played 3 matches while Errani competed in 2 matches. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Wang has played 2 sets more than Errani (6 vs 4). Therefore, Wang played 37 games more than Errani. Wang scored 95 winners (40% on total points). On the other side, The Italian blasted 53 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Wang | Errani |
---|---|---|
Aces | 12 | 0 |
Avg per match | 4 | 0 |
1st in | 136/227 | 81/109 |
%1st in | 60% | 74% |
1st pts | 95/136 | 53/81 |
%1st pts | 70% | 65% |
2nd pts | 43/91 | 12/28 |
%2nd pts | 47% | 43% |
Wang blasted 12 aces (4 per match). Errani didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Wang won 70% points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Errani won 65% points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Wang | Errani |
---|---|---|
Won | 13 | 13 |
Converted | 13/19 | 13/23 |
% Converted | 68% | 57% |
Conceded | 26 | 12 |
Saved | 17 | 9 |
% Saved | 65% | 75% |
Times Broken | 9 | 3 |
Xiyu broke her opponents 13 times with 68% conversion rate. The Chinese conceded her serve 9 times and she saved 65% of the break points that she conceded. Errani broke her opponents 13 times with 57% conversion rate. The Italian conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 75% of the break points that she conceded.
Wang | |||||
Q1 Hibi | Q3 Kalinina | R1 Wang | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | 7-60 7-5 | 6-4 7-68 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 25 | 23 | 67 | |
pts | 65-46 | 97-81 | 75-71 | 237-198 | |
Total points | 111 | 178 | 146 | 435 | |
Winners | 24 | 39 | 32 | 95 | |
%Winners | 37% | 40% | 43% | 40% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 5 | 7 | 0 | 12 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 8 | 5 | 18 | |
1st in | 38/64 | 46/84 | 52/79 | 136/227 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 55% | 66% | 60% | |
1st pts | 24/38 | 39/46 | 32/52 | 95/136 | |
% 1st pts | 63% | 85% | 62% | 70% | |
2nd pts | 15/26 | 17/38 | 11/27 | 43/91 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 45% | 41% | 47% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 5 | 3 | 5 | 13 | |
Converted | 5/5 | 3/6 | 5/8 | 13/19 | |
Converted % | 100% | 50% | 63% | 68% | |
Conceded | 4 | 10 | 12 | 26 | |
Saved | 1/4 | 8/10 | 8/12 | 17 | |
Saved % | 25% | 80% | 67% | 57% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 2 | 4 | 200 |
Errani | |||||
Q1 Voegele | Q3 Gibbs | Total | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-2 | 6-3 6-0 | |||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | ||
Tot Games | 15 | 15 | 30 | ||
pts | 57-33 | 74-53 | 131-86 | ||
Total points | 90 | 127 | 217 | ||
Winners | 23 | 30 | 53 | ||
%Winners | 40% | 41% | 40% | ||
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Double Faults | 3 | 5 | 8 | ||
1st in | 31/42 | 50/67 | 81/109 | ||
% 1st in | 74% | 75% | 74% | ||
1st pts | 23/31 | 30/50 | 53/81 | ||
% 1st pts | 74% | 60% | 65% | ||
2nd pts | 5/11 | 7/17 | 12/28 | ||
% 2nd pts | 45% | 41% | 43% | ||
Breaks | |||||
Won | 6 | 7 | 13 | ||
Converted | 6/8 | 7/15 | 13/23 | ||
Converted % | 75% | 47% | 57% | ||
Conceded | 2 | 10 | 12 | ||
Saved | 1/2 | 8/10 | 9 | ||
Saved % | 50% | 80% | 43% | ||
Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 50 |
Tennis Scores in Acapulco
- Kaja JuvanJuvan – Venus WilliamsWilliams (4-6 7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Caroline DolehideDolehide – Usue Maitane ArconadaMaitane Arconada (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Leylah Annie FernandezAnnie Fernandez – Nina StojanovicStojanovic (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Renata ZarazuaZarazua – Sloane StephensStephens (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Christina MchaleMchale – Lauren DavisDavis (6-2 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Sara ErraniErrani – Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Lin ZhuZhu – Katarina ZavatskaZavatska (7-62 6-2) – See score progression
- Tatjana MariaMaria – Marie BouzkovaBouzkova (6-4 1-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Kateryna BondarenkoBondarenko – Danka KovinicKovinic (6-77 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Anastasia PotapovaPotapova – Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova (4-6 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Tamara ZidansekZidansek – Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Heather WatsonWatson – Coco VandewegheVandeweghe (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Xiyu WangWang – Yafan WangWang (6-4 7-68) – See score progression
- Nao HibinoHibino – Arantxa RusRus (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Renata ZarazuaZarazua – Sloane StephensStephens (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Shelby RogersRogers (6-2 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Kaja JuvanJuvan – Venus WilliamsWilliams (4-6 7-6(4) 6-2) – See score progression
- Leylah Annie FernandezAnnie Fernandez – Nina StojanovicStojanovic (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Caroline DolehideDolehide – Usue Maitane ArconadaMaitane Arconada (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Christina MchaleMchale – Lauren DavisDavis (6-2 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Lin ZhuZhu – Katarina ZavatskaZavatska (7-6(2) 6-2) – See score progression
- Sara ErraniErrani – Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Katie BoulterBoulter – Jasmine PaoliniPaolini (1-0) – See H2H details
- Renata ZarazuaZarazua – Katie VolynetsVolynets (0-0) – See H2H details
- Tamara ZidansekZidansek – Kaja JuvanJuvan (1-0) – See H2H details
- Tatjana MariaMaria – Anastasia PotapovaPotapova (1-1) – See H2H details
- Leylah Annie FernandezAnnie Fernandez – Nao HibinoHibino (2-1) – See H2H details
- Heather WatsonWatson – Kateryna BondarenkoBondarenko (2-2) – See H2H details
- Caroline DolehideDolehide – Christina MchaleMchale (0-0) – See H2H details
- Sara ErraniErrani – Xiyu WangWang (0-0) – See H2H details