Laura Siegemund and Magdalena Frech will face off in the qualifications of the Qatar Total Open for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 12:00 pm on COURT 3. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Laura Siegemund who should win in 3 sets.
Laura Siegemund -> 1.53
Magdalena Frech -> 2.37
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Laura Siegemund vs. Magdalena Frech
This will be the 2nd time that Laura Siegemund and Magdalena Frech clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Siegemund (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Siegemund won 5-7 6-3 6-4 in the 1st round in at the U.S. Open back in 2019.
Highlights Laura Siegemund vs Laura Siegemund – U.S. Open 26-August-2019
Laura Siegemund
Ranked no. 73, the German reached the 1st round after defeating Mubaraka Al-Naimi 6-0 6-0.
In the qualifications, Siegemund had a good straight sets win against Al-Naimi (6-0 6-0). During the match Siegemund scored 52 points vs Al-Naimi’s 15. Siegemund was extremely aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about serving, Siegemund blasted 2 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Laura Siegemund was extremely effective on serve to win 83% (20/24) of her 1st serve and 63% (5/8) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Siegemund broke Al-Naimi 6 times after converting 55% of her break points (6/11).
Siegemund has a weak win-loss record in the last 10 years having won only 49% of her matches (284-298). 4-2 on hard in 2020. . In connection with her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Siegemund has a 134-104 record in the last 10 years on hard.
The German has a 6-2 win-loss record in 2020, 4-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Doha
Laura didn’t play in Doha in 2019.
Magdalena Frech
Ranked no. 165, the Pole got to the 1st round after beating Shuai Peng 6-4 6-75 6-0.
In the qualifications, Frech defeated Peng (6-4 6-75 6-0). During the match Frech scored 102 points vs Peng’s 85. Frech was extremely aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about serving, Frech blasted 6 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Magdalena Frech lost the serve 3 times and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Frech put 60% of her first serves in, winning 69% (36/52) of the points behind her 1st serve and 56% (19/34) on the 2nd serve. The Pole broke Peng 7 times after converting 64% of her break points (7/11).
Frech has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 58% of her matches (163-120). 5-2 on hard in 2020. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this event, Frech has a 66-55 record in the last 6 years on hard.
Frech has a 7-3 win-loss record in 2020, 5-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Doha
Frech didn’t compete in Doha in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Siegemund | Frech |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 12 | 29 |
| Pts | 52-15 | 102-85 |
| Total Points | 67 | 187 |
| Winners | 20 | 36 |
| %Winners | 38% | 35% |
Both Siegemund and Frech played 1 matche. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Magdalena Frech conceded 1 set while Laura Siegemund hasn’t lost a set so far. Siegemund has played 1 sets less than Frech (2 vs 3). Therefore, Siegemund played 17 games less than Frech. Siegemund scored 20 winners (38% on total points). On the other side, Frech blasted 36 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Siegemund | Frech |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 6 |
| 1st in | 24/32 | 52/86 |
| %1st in | 75% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 20/24 | 36/52 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 5/8 | 19/34 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 56% |
Siegemund blasted 2 aces . Frech blasted 6 aces . Siegemund won 83% points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Frech won 69% points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Siegemund | Frech |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 7 |
| Converted | 6/11 | 7/11 |
| % Converted | 55% | 64% |
| Conceded | 0 | 9 |
| Saved | 0 | 6 |
| % Saved | NAN% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
The German broke her opponent 6 times with 55% conversion rate. Laura was rock solid on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Pole broke her opponent 7 times with 64% conversion rate. Frech conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded.
| Siegemund | |||
| Q1 Al-Naimi | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 12 | 12 | |
| pts | 52-15 | 52-15 | |
| Total points | 67 | 67 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 24/32 | 24/32 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 20/24 | 20/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | -100 | |
| Frech | |||
| Q1 Peng | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-75 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 102-85 | 102-85 | |
| Total points | 187 | 187 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 52/86 | 52/86 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 36/52 | 36/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/34 | 19/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/11 | 7/11 | |
| Converted % | 64% | 64% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 200 | |
Upcoming matches
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Timea BabosBabos (1-2) – See H2H details
- Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova – Priscilla HonHon (0-0) – See H2H details
- Bernarda PeraPera – Camila GiorgiGiorgi (0-0) – See H2H details
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Misaki DoiDoi (0-0) – See H2H details
- Jil TeichmannTeichmann – Jana CepelovaCepelova (0-0) – See H2H details
- Darya KasatkinaKasatkina – Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich (3-3) – See H2H details
- Laura SiegemundSiegemund – Magdalena FrechFrech (1-0) – See H2H details
- Kirsten FlipkensFlipkens – Greetje MinnenMinnen (0-0) – See H2H details
- Alison Van UytvanckVan Uytvanck – Polona HercogHercog (1-3) – See H2H details
- Sorana CirsteaCirstea – Elena RybakinaRybakina (0-0) – See H2H details
- Jennifer BradyBrady – Alison RiskeRiske (1-1) – See H2H details
- Petra MarticMartic – Barbora StrycovaStrycova (4-1) – See H2H details
- Shuai ZhangZhang – Carla Suarez NavarroSuarez Navarro (0-3) – See H2H details
- Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova – Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova (0-0) – See H2H details
- Svetlana KuznetsovaKuznetsova – Cagla BuyukakcayBuyukakcay (1-0) – See H2H details
- Iga SwiatekSwiatek – Aryna SabalenkaSabalenka (0-0) – See H2H details
- Elise MertensMertens – Qiang WangWang (2-3) – See H2H details
- Anastasia PavlyuchenkovaPavlyuchenkova – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (2-0) – See H2H details
- Kristina MladenovicMladenovic – Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova (0-0) – See H2H details
- Karolina MuchovaMuchova – Magda LinetteLinette (1-1) – See H2H details
- Su-Wei HsiehHsieh – Vera ZvonarevaZvonareva (0-1) – See H2H details
- Saisai ZhengZheng – Marketa VondrousovaVondrousova (0-1) – See H2H details
- Maria SakkariSakkari – Julia GoergesGoerges (1-3) – See H2H details
- Anett KontaveitKontaveit – Anastasija SevastovaSevastova (1-1) – See H2H details