Jil Teichmann and Jana Cepelova will square off in the qualifications of the Qatar Total Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 2:30 pm on COURT 5. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jil Teichmann who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jil Teichmann is the pick to win this match.
Jil Teichmann -> 1.61
Jana Cepelova -> 2.20
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jil Teichmann vs. Jana Cepelova
There is no head to head record between Jil Teichmann and Jana Cepelova since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Jil Teichmann
Ranked no. 68, the Swiss got to the qualifications after defeating Margarita Gasparyan 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Jil had a good straight sets win against Gasparyan (6-3 6-4). During the match Belen Teichmann scored 69 points vs Gasparyan’s 55. Belen Teichmann was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Belen Teichmann wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 3 double faults. Jil Teichmann lost the serve 3 times and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Belen Teichmann put 63% of her first serves in, winning 63% (26/41) of the points behind her 1st serve and 58% (14/24) on the 2nd serve. Jil broke Gasparyan 5 times after converting 71% of her break points (5/7).
Belen Teichmann has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 60% of her matches (101-153). 2-4 on hard in 2020. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Belen Teichmann has a 75-66 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
Jil has a 4-4 win-loss record in 2020, 2-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Doha
The Swiss didn’t compete in Doha in 2019.
Jana Cepelova
Ranked no. 163, the Slovakian reached the qualifications after defeating Varvara Gracheva 6-4 4-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Slovakian defeated Gracheva (6-4 4-6 6-4). During the match Cepelova scored 104 points vs Gracheva’s 95. The Slovakian was extremely aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about serving, Cepelova blasted 3 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Jana Cepelova lost the serve 6 times and she saved 13 break points. Furthermore, Cepelova put 55% of her first serves in, winning 68% (40/59) of the points behind her 1st serve and 39% (19/49) on the 2nd serve. Cepelova broke Gracheva 7 times after converting 47% of her break points (7/15).
Cepelova has a winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 54% of her matches (440-373). 1-1 on hard in 2020. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Cepelova has a 155-138 record in the last 10 years on hard.
Cepelova has a 1-1 win-loss record in 2020, 1-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Doha
Jana didn’t compete in Doha in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Belen Teichmann | Cepelova |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 19 | 30 |
Pts | 69-55 | 104-95 |
Total Points | 124 | 199 |
Winners | 26 | 40 |
%Winners | 38% | 38% |
Both Belen Teichmann and Cepelova played 1 matche. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Jana Cepelova conceded 1 set while Jil Teichmann hasn’t conceded a set so far. Belen Teichmann has played 1 sets less than Cepelova (2 vs 3). Therefore, Belen Teichmann played 11 games less than Cepelova. The Swiss scored 26 winners (38% on total points). On the other side, Cepelova blasted 40 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Belen Teichmann | Cepelova |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 3 |
Avg per match | 0 | 3 |
1st in | 41/65 | 59/108 |
%1st in | 63% | 55% |
1st pts | 26/41 | 40/59 |
%1st pts | 63% | 68% |
2nd pts | 14/24 | 19/49 |
%2nd pts | 58% | 39% |
Belen Teichmann didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Cepelova blasted 3 aces . Belen Teichmann won 63% points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Cepelova won 68% points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 39% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Belen Teichmann | Cepelova |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 7 |
Converted | 5/7 | 7/15 |
% Converted | 71% | 47% |
Conceded | 6 | 19 |
Saved | 3 | 13 |
% Saved | 50% | 68% |
Times Broken | 3 | 6 |
Belen Teichmann broke her opponent 5 times with 71% conversion rate. Jil conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded. Cepelova broke her opponent 7 times with 47% conversion rate. Jana conceded her serve 6 times and she saved 68% of the break points that she conceded.
Belen Teichmann | |||
Q1 Gasparyan |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 69-55 | 69-55 | |
Total points | 124 | 124 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 41/65 | 41/65 | |
% 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
1st pts | 26/41 | 26/41 | |
% 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
2nd pts | 14/24 | 14/24 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 200 |
Cepelova | |||
Q1 Gracheva |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
pts | 104-95 | 104-95 | |
Total points | 199 | 199 | |
Winners | 40 | 40 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 59/108 | 59/108 | |
% 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
1st pts | 40/59 | 40/59 | |
% 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 19/49 | 19/49 | |
% 2nd pts | 39% | 39% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 7 | 7 | |
Converted | 7/15 | 7/15 | |
Converted % | 47% | 47% | |
Conceded | 19 | 19 | |
Saved | 13/19 | 13 | |
Saved % | 68% | 68% | |
Times Broken | 6 | 500 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Timea BabosBabos (1-2) – See H2H details
- Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova – Priscilla HonHon (0-0) – See H2H details
- Bernarda PeraPera – Camila GiorgiGiorgi (0-0) – See H2H details
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Misaki DoiDoi (0-0) – See H2H details
- Jil TeichmannTeichmann – Jana CepelovaCepelova (0-0) – See H2H details
- Darya KasatkinaKasatkina – Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich (3-3) – See H2H details
- Laura SiegemundSiegemund – Magdalena FrechFrech (1-0) – See H2H details
- Kirsten FlipkensFlipkens – Greetje MinnenMinnen (0-0) – See H2H details
- Alison Van UytvanckVan Uytvanck – Polona HercogHercog (1-3) – See H2H details
- Sorana CirsteaCirstea – Elena RybakinaRybakina (0-0) – See H2H details
- Jennifer BradyBrady – Alison RiskeRiske (1-1) – See H2H details
- Petra MarticMartic – Barbora StrycovaStrycova (4-1) – See H2H details
- Shuai ZhangZhang – Carla Suarez NavarroSuarez Navarro (0-3) – See H2H details
- Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova – Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova (0-0) – See H2H details
- Svetlana KuznetsovaKuznetsova – Cagla BuyukakcayBuyukakcay (1-0) – See H2H details
- Iga SwiatekSwiatek – Aryna SabalenkaSabalenka (0-0) – See H2H details
- Elise MertensMertens – Qiang WangWang (2-3) – See H2H details
- Anastasia PavlyuchenkovaPavlyuchenkova – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (2-0) – See H2H details
- Kristina MladenovicMladenovic – Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova (0-0) – See H2H details
- Karolina MuchovaMuchova – Magda LinetteLinette (1-1) – See H2H details
- Su-Wei HsiehHsieh – Vera ZvonarevaZvonareva (0-1) – See H2H details
- Saisai ZhengZheng – Marketa VondrousovaVondrousova (0-1) – See H2H details
- Maria SakkariSakkari – Julia GoergesGoerges (1-3) – See H2H details
- Anett KontaveitKontaveit – Anastasija SevastovaSevastova (1-1) – See H2H details