Cem Ilkel and Hugo Gaston will face off in the quarter of the Bergamo Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 11:00 am on PALAAGNELLI. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Cem Ilkel who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Cem Ilkel is the pick to win this match.
Cem Ilkel -> 1.72
Hugo Gaston -> 2.00
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Cem Ilkel vs. Hugo Gaston
There is no head to head record between Cem Ilkel and Hugo Gaston since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Cem Ilkel
Ranked no. 199 (career high), Ilkel reached the quarter after defeating Viktor Durasovic 6-3 6-4 and Raul Brancaccio 6-1 7-62.
In the 3rd round, Ilkel had a good straight sets win against Brancaccio (6-1 7-62). During the match Ilkel scored 75 points vs Brancaccio’s 53. Ilkel was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Ilkel blasted 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Cem Ilkel was extremely effective on serve to win 84% (31/37) of his 1st serve and 63% (12/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Cem broke Brancaccio twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Ilkel hasn’t conceded yet a set in this tournament to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Ilkel has a losing win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 38% of his matches (95-57). 10-2 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ilkel has a 67-79 record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
The Turk’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Quimper Challenger.
Cem has a 11-4 win-loss record in 2020, 10-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Bergamo Challenger
Ilkel lost in the 2nd round 6-3 6-4 to Stefano Napolitano.
Hugo Gaston
Ranked no. 248, the French Player reached the quarter after defeating Hugo Grenier 6-3 6-0 and Lorenzo Giustino 6-3 3-6 6-4.
In the 3rd round, The French Player defeated Giustino (6-3 3-6 6-4). During the match Gaston scored 97 points vs Giustino’s 84. The French Player was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Gaston blasted 5 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Hugo Gaston lost the serve 5 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Gaston put 56% of his first serves in, winning 65% (31/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (19/38) on the 2nd serve. Hugo broke Giustino 6 times after converting 40% of his break points (6/15).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Gaston has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 58% of the points he played.
Gaston has a negative record in the last 5 years having won 45% of his matches (14-17). 2-2 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Gaston has a 13-18 record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
Hugo has a 3-5 win-loss record in 2020, 2-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Bergamo Challenger
The French Player didn’t compete in the Bergamo Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ilkel | Gaston |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 39 | 43 |
| Pts | 130-101 | 160-118 |
| Total Points | 231 | 278 |
| Winners | 62 | 51 |
| %Winners | 48% | 32% |
Both Ilkel and Gaston played 2 matches. At the moment, Hugo Gaston conceded 1 set while Cem Ilkel hasn’t conceded a set so far. Ilkel has played 1 sets less than Gaston (4 vs 5). Therefore, Ilkel played 4 games less than Gaston. Ilkel scored 62 winners (48% on total points). On the other side, Hugo blasted 51 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ilkel | Gaston |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 14 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 4.5 |
| 1st in | 76/113 | 74/125 |
| %1st in | 67% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 62/76 | 51/74 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 16/37 | 29/51 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 57% |
Ilkel blasted 14 aces (7 per match). Gaston blasted 9 aces (4.5 per match). Ilkel won 82% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Gaston won 69% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ilkel | Gaston |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 11 |
| Converted | 6/13 | 11/23 |
| % Converted | 46% | 48% |
| Conceded | 3 | 13 |
| Saved | 1 | 7 |
| % Saved | 33% | 54% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 6 |
Cem broke his opponents 6 times with 46% conversion rate. Ilkel conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. The French Player broke his opponents 11 times with 48% conversion rate. The French Player conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 54% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ilkel | ||||
| R2 Durasovic |
R3 Brancaccio |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 6-1 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 20 | 39 | |
| pts | 55-48 | 75-53 | 130-101 | |
| Total points | 103 | 128 | 231 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | 62 | |
| %Winners | 56% | 41% | 48% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 39/57 | 37/56 | 76/113 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 66% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 31/39 | 31/37 | 62/76 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 84% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 4/18 | 12/19 | 16/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 22% | 63% | 43% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 2/7 | 6/13 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 29% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 0/0 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | – | 17% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Gaston | ||||
| R2 Grenier |
R3 Giustino |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 28 | 43 | |
| pts | 63-34 | 97-84 | 160-118 | |
| Total points | 97 | 181 | 278 | |
| Winners | 20 | 31 | 51 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 26/39 | 48/86 | 74/125 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 56% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 20/26 | 31/48 | 51/74 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 65% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/13 | 19/38 | 29/51 | |
| % 2nd pts | 77% | 50% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 11 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 6/15 | 11/23 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 40% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 12 | 13 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 7/12 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 58% | 29% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 5 | 200 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLWLLLW
WWWLWWWWWL Tennis Scores in Bergamo Challenger
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Filippo BaldiBaldi (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Baptiste CrepatteCrepatte – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (2-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio (6-1 7-62) – See score progression
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Luca VanniVanni (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Roberto MarcoraMarcora – Pedja KrstinKrstin (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (7-5 ret.) – See score progression
- Hugo GastonGaston – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (6-3 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Zdenek KolarKolar (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (0-0) – See H2H details
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Roberto MarcoraMarcora (0-0) – See H2H details
- Baptiste CrepatteCrepatte – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (0-0) – See H2H details
- Hugo GastonGaston – Cem IlkelIlkel (0-0) – See H2H details
