Yannick Maden and Botic Van De Zandschulp will fight against each other in the quarter of the Koblenz Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 3:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.83
Yannick Maden -> 1.83
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Yannick Maden vs. Botic Van De Zandschulp
There is no head to head record between Yannick Maden and Botic Van De Zandschulp since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.However, they played each other in futures. Therefore their H2H is 1-0 for Maden.
Yannick Maden
Ranked no. 144, Yannick got to the quarter after beating Louis Wessels 3-6 7-65 6-3 and Ergi Kirkin 6-3 6-0.
In the 3rd round, Maden had a good straight sets win against Kirkin (6-3 6-0). During the match Maden scored 58 points vs Kirkin’s 37. Yannick was extremely aggressive to blast 12 winners.
Talking about serving, Maden couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Yannick Maden was extremely effective on serve to win 75% (12/16) of his 1st serve and 63% (12/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Yannick broke Kirkin 6 times after converting 60% of his break points (6/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The German has conceded 1 set in this competition to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Maden has a losing win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 35% of his matches (267-146). 3-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Maden has a 125-89 win-loss record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Yannick has a 6-5 win-loss record in 2020, 3-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Koblenz Challenger
The German didn’t play in the Koblenz Challenger in 2019.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Ranked no. 204, Van De Zandschulp got to the quarter after defeating Igor Sijsling w/o and Maximilian Marterer 6-4 6-2.
In the 3rd round, Van De Zandschulp had a good straight sets win against Marterer (6-4 6-2). During the match Van De Zandschulp scored 59 points vs Marterer’s 40. Botic was extremely aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about serving, Van De Zandschulp blasted 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp was extremely effective on serve to win 89% (24/27) of his 1st serve and 75% (12/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Van De Zandschulp broke Marterer 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Van De Zandschulp has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 69% of his matches (156-71). 1-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Van De Zandschulp has a 118-65 record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
The Dutch has a 2-3 win-loss record in 2020, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Koblenz Challenger
Botic didn’t play in the Koblenz Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Maden | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 46 | 18 |
| Pts | 158-136 | 59-40 |
| Total Points | 294 | 99 |
| Winners | 47 | 24 |
| %Winners | 30% | 41% |
Maden played 2 matches while Van De Zandschulp competed in 1 matches. At the moment, Yannick Maden dropped 1 set while Botic Van De Zandschulp hasn’t lost a set so far. Maden has played 3 sets more than Van De Zandschulp (5 vs 2). Therefore, Maden played 28 games more than Van De Zandschulp. Yannick scored 47 winners (30% on total points). On the other side, The Dutch blasted 24 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Maden | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 6 |
| 1st in | 68/118 | 27/43 |
| %1st in | 58% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 47/68 | 24/27 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 89% |
| 2nd pts | 30/50 | 12/16 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 75% |
Maden blasted 4 aces (2 per match). Van De Zandschulp blasted 6 aces . Maden won 69% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Van De Zandschulp won 89% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 75% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Maden | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 3 |
| Converted | 10/24 | 3/4 |
| % Converted | 42% | 75% |
| Conceded | 6 | 0 |
| Saved | 2 | 0 |
| % Saved | 33% | NAN% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 |
Yannick broke his opponents 10 times with 42% conversion rate. Yannick conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. The Dutch broke his opponent 3 times with 75% conversion rate. The Dutch was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Maden | ||||
| R2 Wessels |
R3 Kirkin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 7-65 6-3 | 6-3 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 15 | 46 | |
| pts | 100-99 | 58-37 | 158-136 | |
| Total points | 199 | 95 | 294 | |
| Winners | 35 | 12 | 47 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 21% | 30% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 52/83 | 16/35 | 68/118 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 46% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 35/52 | 12/16 | 47/68 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 75% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/31 | 12/19 | 30/50 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 63% | 60% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
| Converted | 4/14 | 6/10 | 10/24 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 60% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 1 | 6 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 0/1 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 0% | 20% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 | 100 | |
| Van De Zandschulp | ||||
| R2 Sijsling |
R3 Marterer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | w/o | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 0 | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | – | 59-40 | 59-40 | |
| Total points | 0 | 99 | 99 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | ||
| %Winners | NAN% | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 0 | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | ||
| 1st in | / | 27/43 | 27/43 | |
| % 1st in | NAN% | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | / | 24/27 | 24/27 | |
| % 1st pts | NAN% | 89% | 89% | |
| 2nd pts | / | 12/16 | 12/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | NAN% | 75% | 75% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | ||
| Converted | / | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | NAN% | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | -100 | ||
Head 2 Head
WLLWWWLLWL Tennis Scores in Koblenz Challenger
- Ruben BemelmansBemelmans – Quentin HalysHalys (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Yannick MadenMaden – Ergi KirkinKirkin (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Vit KoprivaKopriva (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Dustin BrownBrown (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel MasurMasur – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (5-7 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Mirza BasicBasic (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Maximilian MartererMarterer (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Ruben BemelmansBemelmans – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-0) – See H2H details
- Yannick MadenMaden – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (1-0) – See H2H details
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Tomas MachacMachac (0-0) – See H2H details
- Daniel MasurMasur – Nicola KuhnKuhn (0-0) – See H2H details
