Christopher O Connell and Ji Sung Nam will square off in the 3rd round of the Drummondville Challenger for the 1st time in their career. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction and head to head Christopher O Connell vs. Ji Sung Nam
There is no head to head record between Christopher O Connell and Ji Sung Nam since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Christopher O Connell
Ranked no. 115, O Connell reached the 3rd round after beating Antoine Escoffier 6-3 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Christopher had a good straight sets win against Escoffier (6-3 6-4). During the match O Connell scored 64 points vs Escoffier’s 50. The Australian was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, O Connell blasted 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Christopher O Connell was extremely effective on serve to win 77% (27/35) of his 1st serve and 56% (14/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Christopher broke Escoffier 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
O Connell has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 67% of his matches (9-18). 1-2 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, O Connell has a 54-58 record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
O Connell has a 4-5 win-loss record in 2020, 1-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Drummondville Challenger
O Connell didn’t play in the Drummondville Challenger in 2019.
Ji Sung Nam
Ranked no. 242, Sung Nam got to the 3rd round after beating Evan Song 6-2 6-1.
In the 2nd round, Ji had a good straight sets win against Song (6-2 6-1). During the match Sung Nam scored 57 points vs Song’s 36. Sung Nam was extremely aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about serving, Sung Nam blasted 4 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Ji Sung Nam was extremely effective on serve to win 86% (19/22) of his 1st serve and 55% (11/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Korean broke Song 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Sung Nam has a winning win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 51% of his matches (19-18). 1-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Sung Nam has a 36-36 record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
Sung Nam has a 2-3 win-loss record in 2020, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Drummondville Challenger
The Korean didn’t play in the Drummondville Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | O Connell | Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 15 |
| Pts | 64-50 | 57-36 |
| Total Points | 114 | 93 |
| Winners | 27 | 19 |
| %Winners | 42% | 33% |
Both O Connell and Sung Nam played 1 matche. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, O Connell and Sung Nam have played the same amount of sets 2. However, O Connell played 4 games more than Sung Nam. Christopher scored 27 winners (42% on total points). On the other side, The Korean blasted 19 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | O Connell | Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 4 |
| 1st in | 35/60 | 22/42 |
| %1st in | 58% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 27/35 | 19/22 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 86% |
| 2nd pts | 14/25 | 11/20 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 55% |
O Connell blasted 4 aces . Sung Nam blasted 4 aces . O Connell won 77% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Sung Nam won 86% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | O Connell | Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/5 | 5/7 |
| % Converted | 60% | 71% |
| Conceded | 2 | 1 |
| Saved | 1 | 1 |
| % Saved | 50% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
O Connell broke his opponent 3 times with 60% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Ji broke his opponent 5 times with 71% conversion rate. Ji was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| O Connell | |||
| R2 Escoffier |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 64-50 | 64-50 | |
| Total points | 114 | 114 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 35/60 | 35/60 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 27/35 | 27/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/25 | 14/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | |
| Sung Nam | |||
| R2 Song |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 57-36 | 57-36 | |
| Total points | 93 | 93 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 22/42 | 22/42 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 19/22 | 19/22 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 11/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | -100 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLWLLLL
LLWWLLWWLL Tennis Scores in Drummondville Challenger
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – Evan SongSong (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (7-5 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Sebastian KordaKorda – Tobias SimonSimon (6-3 4-6 7-66) – See score progression
- Liam BroadyBroady – Vasil KirkovKirkov (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Max PurcellPurcell – Ryan PenistonPeniston (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (6-2 5-7 7-64) – See score progression
- Roberto CidCid – Alejandro GomezGomez (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tobias KamkeKamke – Shintaro ImaiImai (6-3 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Liam CaruanaCaruana – Brayden SchnurSchnur (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Johannes HaerteisHaerteis – Goncalo OliveiraOliveira (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Andrew HarrisHarris – Lucas CatarinaCatarina (3-6 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Taha BaadiBaadi (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Ricardo Rodriguez-PaceRodriguez-Pace (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Manuel GuinardGuinard (6-2 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Patrik Niklas-SalminenNiklas-Salminen – Go SoedaSoeda (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Roberto CidCid – Liam BroadyBroady (0-1) – See H2H details
- Andrew HarrisHarris – Tobias KamkeKamke (0-0) – See H2H details
- Johannes HaerteisHaerteis – Patrik Niklas-SalminenNiklas-Salminen (0-1) – See H2H details
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (0-0) – See H2H details
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Michael MmohMmoh (0-0) – See H2H details
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-0) – See H2H details
- Sebastian KordaKorda – Max PurcellPurcell (0-0) – See H2H details
- Maxime CressyCressy – Liam CaruanaCaruana (1-0) – See H2H details
