Roberto Cid and Liam Broady will fight against each other in the 3rd round of the Drummondville Challenger for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Liam Broady who should win in 3 sets.
Liam Broady -> 1.66
Roberto Cid -> 2.10
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Roberto Cid vs. Liam Broady
This will be the 2nd time that Roberto Cid and Liam Broady square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Broady (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they competed against each other, Broady won 6-3 2-6 7-63 in the 1st round in Las Vegas Challenger back in 2019.
Roberto Cid
Ranked no. 222, Cid reached the 1st round after beating Alejandro Gomez 6-0 6-2.
In the 2nd round, The Dominican had a good straight sets win against Gomez (6-0 6-2). During the match Cid scored 56 points vs Gomez’s 35. Roberto was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Cid blasted 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Roberto Cid conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 5 break points. Furthermore, Cid put 49% of his first serves in, winning 85% (23/27) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (12/28) on the 2nd serve. Roberto broke Gomez 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Cid has a unfavourable record in the last 7 years having won 46% of his matches (45-38). 5-3 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Cid has a 39-39 win-loss record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Roberto’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Ann Arbor Challenger.
The Dominican has a 5-4 win-loss record in 2020, 5-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Drummondville Challenger
The Dominican lost in the quarter 6-2 6-4 to Yannick Maden.
Liam Broady
Ranked no. 228, Broady got to the 1st round after beating Vasil Kirkov 3-6 6-3 6-4.
In the 2nd round against Kirkov, Liam recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 6-4). During the match Broady scored 88 points vs Kirkov’s 74. Liam was extremely aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about serving, Broady blasted 4 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Liam Broady was extremely effective on serve to win 81% (42/52) of his 1st serve and 67% (14/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Liam broke Kirkov twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Broady has a winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (200-148). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Broady has a 140-134 record in the last 10 years on indoor hard courts.
The Brit has a 3-3 win-loss record in 2020, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Drummondville Challenger
Broady didn’t compete in the Drummondville Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cid | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 14 | 28 |
| Pts | 56-35 | 88-74 |
| Total Points | 91 | 162 |
| Winners | 23 | 42 |
| %Winners | 41% | 48% |
Both Cid and Broady played 1 matche. At the moment, Liam Broady conceded 1 set while Roberto Cid hasn’t dropped a set so far. Cid has played 1 sets less than Broady (2 vs 3). Therefore, Cid played 14 games less than Broady. Cid scored 23 winners (41% on total points). On the other side, Broady blasted 42 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cid | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 4 |
| 1st in | 27/55 | 52/73 |
| %1st in | 49% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 23/27 | 42/52 |
| %1st pts | 85% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 12/28 | 14/21 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 67% |
Cid blasted 2 aces . Broady blasted 4 aces . Cid won 85% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Broady won 81% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cid | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 2 |
| Converted | 5/6 | 2/6 |
| % Converted | 83% | 33% |
| Conceded | 5 | 3 |
| Saved | 5 | 2 |
| % Saved | 100% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Cid broke his opponent 5 times with 83% conversion rate. Cid was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 5 break points. The Brit broke his opponent twice with 33% conversion rate. Liam conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Cid | |||
| R2 Gomez | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 56-35 | 56-35 | |
| Total points | 91 | 91 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 27/55 | 27/55 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 23/27 | 23/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/28 | 12/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | -100 | |
| Broady | |||
| R2 Kirkov | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 88-74 | 88-74 | |
| Total points | 162 | 162 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 52/73 | 52/73 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 42/52 | 42/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/21 | 14/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores in Drummondville Challenger
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (7-5 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Liam BroadyBroady – Vasil KirkovKirkov (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – Evan SongSong (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Roberto CidCid – Alejandro GomezGomez (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (6-2 5-7 7-64) – See score progression
- Sebastian KordaKorda – Tobias SimonSimon (6-3 4-6 7-66) – See score progression
- Max PurcellPurcell – Ryan PenistonPeniston (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Andrew HarrisHarris – Lucas CatarinaCatarina (3-6 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Liam CaruanaCaruana – Brayden SchnurSchnur (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Tobias KamkeKamke – Shintaro ImaiImai (6-3 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Manuel GuinardGuinard (6-2 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Patrik Niklas-SalminenNiklas-Salminen – Go SoedaSoeda (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Taha BaadiBaadi (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Johannes HaerteisHaerteis – Goncalo OliveiraOliveira (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Ricardo Rodriguez-PaceRodriguez-Pace (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (7-5 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (6-2 5-7 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Christopher O’ConnellO’Connell – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Roberto CidCid – Liam BroadyBroady (0-1) – See H2H details
- Andrew HarrisHarris – Tobias KamkeKamke (0-0) – See H2H details
- Johannes HaerteisHaerteis – Patrik Niklas-SalminenNiklas-Salminen (0-1) – See H2H details
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (0-0) – See H2H details
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Michael MmohMmoh (0-0) – See H2H details
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-0) – See H2H details
- Sebastian KordaKorda – Max PurcellPurcell (0-0) – See H2H details
- Maxime CressyCressy – Liam CaruanaCaruana (1-0) – See H2H details