Quentin Halys and Ruben Bemelmans will face off in the 3rd round of the Koblenz Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:00 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ruben Bemelmans who should win in 3 sets.
Ruben Bemelmans -> 1.80
Quentin Halys -> 1.90
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Quentin Halys vs. Ruben Bemelmans
There is no head to head record between Quentin Halys and Ruben Bemelmans since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Quentin Halys
Ranked no. 193, Quentin reached the 3rd round after defeating Milan Welte 7-5 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Halys had a good straight sets win against Welte (7-5 6-2). During the match Halys scored 64 points vs Welte’s 47. Quentin was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Halys blasted 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Quentin Halys was extremely effective on serve to win 85% (33/39) of his 1st serve and 67% (10/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The French Player broke Welte 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Halys has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 51% of his matches (231-238). 3-3 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Halys has a 156-141 win-loss record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
Quentin has a 6-5 win-loss record in 2020, 3-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Koblenz Challenger
Quentin didn’t play in the Koblenz Challenger in 2019.
Ruben Bemelmans
Ranked no. 249, Bemelmans got to the 3rd round after defeating Artem Dubrivnyy 6-3 6-1.
In the 2nd round, Ruben had a good straight sets win against Dubrivnyy (6-3 6-1). During the match Bemelmans scored 61 points vs Dubrivnyy’s 41. The Belgian was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Bemelmans blasted 4 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Ruben Bemelmans was extremely effective on serve to win 81% (21/26) of his 1st serve and 62% (13/21) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Bemelmans broke Dubrivnyy 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Bemelmans has a winning record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (384-328). 3-3 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Bemelmans has a 300-235 win-loss record in the last 10 years on indoor hard courts.
Bemelmans’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Nussloch.
Bemelmans has a 8-3 win-loss record in 2020, 3-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Koblenz Challenger
The Belgian didn’t compete in the Koblenz Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Halys | Bemelmans |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 16 |
| Pts | 64-47 | 61-41 |
| Total Points | 111 | 102 |
| Winners | 33 | 21 |
| %Winners | 52% | 34% |
Both Halys and Bemelmans played 1 matche. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Halys and Bemelmans have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Halys played 4 games more than Bemelmans. Halys scored 33 winners (52% on total points). On the other side, Ruben blasted 21 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Halys | Bemelmans |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 4 |
| 1st in | 39/54 | 26/47 |
| %1st in | 72% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 33/39 | 21/26 |
| %1st pts | 85% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 10/15 | 13/21 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 62% |
Halys blasted 6 aces . Bemelmans blasted 4 aces . Halys won 85% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Bemelmans won 81% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Halys | Bemelmans |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/5 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 60% | 50% |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 |
| Saved | 2 | 2 |
| % Saved | 100% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Halys broke his opponent 3 times with 60% conversion rate. The French Player was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points. Bemelmans broke his opponent 4 times with 50% conversion rate. The Belgian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Halys | |||
| R2 Welte | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 64-47 | 64-47 | |
| Total points | 111 | 111 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 52% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 39/54 | 39/54 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 33/39 | 33/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/15 | 10/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | -100 | |
| Bemelmans | |||
| R2 Dubrivnyy | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 61-41 | 61-41 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 26/47 | 26/47 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 21/26 | 21/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/21 | 13/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | -100 | |
Tennis Scores in Koblenz Challenger
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Pavel KotovKotov (6-4 6-75 7-5) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Oscar OtteOtte (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Dustin BrownBrown – Uladzimir IgnatikIgnatik (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Ruben BemelmansBemelmans – Artem DubrivnyyDubrivnyy (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Lucas MiedlerMiedler (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Mirza BasicBasic – Mats MoraingMoraing (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Alessandro BegaBega (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel MasurMasur – Vaclav SafranekSafranek (5-7 7-62 6-2) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Lucas GerchGerch (6-4 2-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (6-77 6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Quentin HalysHalys – Milan WelteWelte (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Yannick MadenMaden – Louis WesselsWessels (3-6 7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Julian LenzLenz (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Mirza BasicBasic – Mats MoraingMoraing (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Igor SijslingSijsling – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (3-2) – See H2H details
- Yannick MadenMaden – Ergi KirkinKirkin (0-0) – See H2H details
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Dustin BrownBrown (0-0) – See H2H details
- Quentin HalysHalys – Ruben BemelmansBemelmans (0-0) – See H2H details
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-0) – See H2H details
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Daniel MasurMasur (0-0) – See H2H details
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Mirza BasicBasic (1-0) – See H2H details
- Tomas MachacMachac – Vit KoprivaKopriva (0-2) – See H2H details