Yannick Maden and Ergi Kirkin will square off in the 3rd round of the Koblenz Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:00 pm on CENTER COURT. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Yannick Maden who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Yannick Maden is the pick to win this match.
Yannick Maden -> 1.12
Ergi Kirkin -> 6.00
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Yannick Maden vs. Ergi Kirkin
There is no head to head record between Yannick Maden and Ergi Kirkin since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Yannick Maden
Ranked no. 144, the German got to the 3rd round after defeating Louis Wessels 3-6 7-65 6-3.
In the 2nd round against Wessels, Maden recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-65 6-3). During the match Maden scored 100 points vs Wessels’s 99. Maden was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about serving, Maden blasted 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Yannick Maden lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Maden put 63% of his first serves in, winning 67% (35/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (18/31) on the 2nd serve. The German broke Wessels 4 times after converting 29% of his break points (4/14).
Maden has a weak record in the last 7 years having won 36% of his matches (259-146). 2-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Maden has a 124-89 win-loss record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Yannick has a 5-5 win-loss record in 2020, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Koblenz Challenger
Yannick didn’t play in the Koblenz Challenger in 2019.
Ergi Kirkin
Ranked no. 523, Ergi reached the 3rd round after defeating Benjamin Hassan 4-6 6-1 6-4 and Pavel Kotov 6-4 6-75 7-5.
In the 2nd round, Kirkin defeated Kotov (6-4 6-75 7-5). During the match Kirkin scored 114 points vs Kotov’s 111. The Turk was extremely aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about serving, Kirkin blasted 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Ergi Kirkin lost the serve 3 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Kirkin put 51% of his first serves in, winning 73% (43/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (28/56) on the 2nd serve. Ergi broke Kotov 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Turk has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 51% of the points he played.
Kirkin has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 67% of his matches (12-6). 2-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Kirkin has a 11-16 win-loss record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
The Turk’s best result of the current year was getting to the semi-finals in M15 Sharm El Sheikh.
Kirkin has a 6-3 win-loss record in 2020, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Koblenz Challenger
Ergi didn’t compete in the Koblenz Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Maden | Kirkin |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 91 |
| Pts | 100-99 | 218-206 |
| Total Points | 199 | 424 |
| Winners | 35 | 94 |
| %Winners | 35% | 43% |
Maden played 1 match while Kirkin competed in 3 matches. Kirkin started his run from the qualifications while Maden had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Yannick Maden conceded 1 set, while Ergi Kirkin dropper 4 sets. Maden has played 6 sets less than Kirkin (3 vs 9). Therefore, Maden played 60 games less than Kirkin. Maden scored 35 winners (35% on total points). On the other side, The Turk blasted 94 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Maden | Kirkin |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 2.3 |
| 1st in | 52/83 | 126/240 |
| %1st in | 63% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 35/52 | 94/126 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 18/31 | 52/114 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 46% |
Maden blasted 4 aces . Kirkin blasted 7 aces (2.3 per match). Maden won 67% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Kirkin won 75% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Maden | Kirkin |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 9 |
| Converted | 4/14 | 9/14 |
| % Converted | 29% | 64% |
| Conceded | 5 | 29 |
| Saved | 2 | 24 |
| % Saved | 40% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 5 |
Yannick broke his opponent 4 times with 29% conversion rate. Maden conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded. The Turk broke his opponents 9 times with 64% conversion rate. Ergi conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Maden | |||
| R2 Wessels |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 7-65 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 100-99 | 100-99 | |
| Total points | 199 | 199 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 52/83 | 52/83 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 35/52 | 35/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/31 | 18/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/14 | 4/14 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 200 | |
| Kirkin | |||||
| Q3 Kumar Mukund |
R1 Hassan |
R2 Kotov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | 6-4 6-75 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 27 | 35 | 91 | |
| pts | – | 104-95 | 114-111 | 218-206 | |
| Total points | 0 | 199 | 225 | 424 | |
| Winners | 51 | 43 | 94 | ||
| %Winners | NAN% | 49% | 38% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 3 | 9 | ||
| 1st in | / | 67/125 | 59/115 | 126/240 | |
| % 1st in | NAN% | 54% | 51% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | / | 51/67 | 43/59 | 94/126 | |
| % 1st pts | NAN% | 76% | 73% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | / | 24/58 | 28/56 | 52/114 | |
| % 2nd pts | NAN% | 41% | 50% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 9 | ||
| Converted | / | 4/6 | 5/8 | 9/14 | |
| Converted % | NAN% | 67% | 63% | 64% | |
| Conceded | 19 | 10 | 29 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 17/19 | 7/10 | 24 | |
| Saved % | – | 89% | 70% | 159% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 67 | ||
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLWWL Tennis Scores in Koblenz Challenger
- Mirza BasicBasic – Mats MoraingMoraing (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Ruben BemelmansBemelmans – Artem DubrivnyyDubrivnyy (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Pavel KotovKotov (6-4 6-75 7-5) – See score progression
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Lucas GerchGerch (6-4 2-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Oscar OtteOtte (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Alessandro BegaBega (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Lucas MiedlerMiedler (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Dustin BrownBrown – Uladzimir IgnatikIgnatik (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel MasurMasur – Vaclav SafranekSafranek (5-7 7-62 6-2) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (6-77 6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Quentin HalysHalys – Milan WelteWelte (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Yannick MadenMaden – Louis WesselsWessels (3-6 7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Julian LenzLenz (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Mirza BasicBasic – Mats MoraingMoraing (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Igor SijslingSijsling – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (3-2) – See H2H details
- Yannick MadenMaden – Ergi KirkinKirkin (0-0) – See H2H details
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Dustin BrownBrown (0-0) – See H2H details
- Quentin HalysHalys – Ruben BemelmansBemelmans (0-0) – See H2H details
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-0) – See H2H details
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Daniel MasurMasur (0-0) – See H2H details
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Mirza BasicBasic (1-0) – See H2H details
- Tomas MachacMachac – Vit KoprivaKopriva (0-2) – See H2H details
